1 / 19

Introduction to carbon financing

Introduction to carbon financing. Presentation prepared for “First DG/GGFR Global Gas Flaring Workshop" Presented by Roman Schibli, South Pole Carbon Asset Management Ltd. Doha, October 6, 2009. Contents. Fundamental notions CDM project risks Commercialization strategies.

zasha
Download Presentation

Introduction to carbon financing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Introduction to carbon financing Presentation prepared for “First DG/GGFR Global Gas Flaring Workshop" Presented by Roman Schibli, South Pole Carbon Asset Management Ltd. Doha, October 6, 2009

  2. Contents • Fundamental notions • CDM project risks • Commercialization strategies

  3. CDM registration is a long procedure which should be undertaken in parallel with project development Project development Feasibility analysis Financial closure Construc-tion Concept Operation CER issuance Project registration Project docu-menta-tion (PDD) Host country approval (DNA) Monitor-ing and verifica-tion Initial scope (PIN) UNFCCC regis-tration Valida-tion(DOE) CDM development Issuance of CERs Time [# months] 2.5 3 3 2* 6 0.5 * In parallel to validation

  4. When should the CERs be sold? 98 CER issuance Project registration Project status Category 1 Category 2 Category 3 Category 4 Project docu-menta-tion (PDD) Host country approval (DNA) Monitor-ing and verifica-tion Initial stages Project under validation Initial scope (PIN) UNFCCC regis-tration Valida-tion(DOE) Project registered CERs issues Issuance of CERs Contract type Spot contract Forward contract Costs CDM costs borne by PO Costs can be shared between PO & CDM developer

  5. Credits from more advanced projects fetch a higher price on the market 98 CER prices paid for projects at different stages EUR/CER

  6. What drives carbon market prices? 98 Example: EU ETS Fundamental factors… …and major events have driven volatility in carbon prices • Regulatory issues such as allocation plans • Gas-coal spread impacts the economic viability of fuel switching • Economic growth increases demand for power and therefore increases emissions and demand for credits • Weather impacts demand for power, and availability of renewable energy (e.g. hydro in dry conditions) • CDM / JI markets impacts the supply of credits available EUA Prices EUR / ton

  7. Contents • Fundamental notions • CDM project risks • Commercialization strategies

  8. Carbon market prices are very volatile… EUR

  9. ... and dropped substantially during the financial crisis 6 Prices before – after the financial crisis EUR / ER Implications 30 25 -50% • High quality credits held up better during the crisis • „Flight to quality“ -60% 15 13 -46% 10 -67% Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post GS CER CER GS VER VCU

  10. Different project types have varying exposure to non-registration risks 98 Proportion of projects rejected registration by reason Risk: Low High

  11. 114 Issuance risks is highly project specific • Issuance risk is the risk that the project does not issue the full amount of credits estimated in the PDD Major risks • Monitoring complexity – the more complex the monitoring requirements the more likely the DOE or the EB will introduce conservativeness measures • Project performance – if the project underperforms this will impact the number of credits issued (e.g. if less electricity produced than estimated) Relative risk of project Historic average issuance (% of PDD estimate) • actual issuance from flare gas reduction projects is 114% • Only 2 observations • The issuance is higher for simple projects, but lower for more complex projects such as LFG • Project type • Average issuance (%) • Flare gas reduction • Hydropower • Waste gas / heat recovery • Wind power • Energy efficiency • Biogas • Methane recovery • Cement • Fuel switch

  12. Contents • Fundamental notions • CDM project risks • Commercialization strategies

  13. Forward contracts 1: advantages of fixed price ERPAs 98 • Fixed Price ERPA: ERPA with a fixed price, whatever the market price might be Avantages Illustration • A fixed price ERPA was concluded in September 2008 for 14 EUR • Subsequently the market price fell below the ERPA price • Diminish the carbon market price risks • CDM revenues can easily be accounted for • CDM development costs can be borne by buyer • Credits can be sold at an early stage • CDM developer bears risk of non-issuance

  14. Forward contracts 1: disadvantages of fixed price ERPAs 98 • Fixed Price ERPA: ERPA with a fixed price, whatever the market price might be Disadvantages Illustration • A fixed price ERPA for 14 EUR was concluded with Lucky Traders Ltd. in September 08, a carbon buyer with a weak balance sheet • Secondary market price • No participations in price rallies • Price “discount” • for post-2012 offers • ERPA price 2012 • When the credits are issued the market price is equal to 8 EUR • Lucky Traders Ltd should sell the credits at a loss, but declares bankruptcy • Great counterparty risk

  15. Forward contracts 2: advantages & disadvantages of revenue share ERPAs 98 • Revenue share ERPA: ERPA where the CER price depends on the market price Avantages • Less post-2012 discount • Lesser counter-party risk • CDM development costs can be borne by buyer Illustration • An ERPA with 80% revenue share for the project owner was concluded • Secondary mkt price Disadvantages • Full exposure to CER price fluctuation • Hard to account for carbon revenues • ERPA price 2012

  16. Forward contracts with delivery guarantee: advantages & disadvantages 98 • A delivery guarantee is a guarantee provided by a project to a carbon credit buyer that a minimum number of carbon credits will be delivered by the project Advantage / disadvantage Case illustration • Lucky Traders Ltd realizes that they cannot take on carbon price risk and so decide to enter a back-to-back agreement to sell Gulf Oil’s credits on directly. • However, in order to ensure that they can fulfill this contract, Luck Traders demands that Gulf Oil provides a guarantee that they deliver the estimated number of emission reductions. • Potentially higher price • With a delivery guarantee, Primary CERs have similar risk to Secondary CERs and should therefore fetch a similar price • Multiplication of project risk • If the project underperforms, Gulf Oil will produce insufficient ERs and will therefore have to spend cash to buy CERs on the market when the performance from the project is worst. • Potentially onerous non-delivery clauses • Lucky Traders may insert a clause saying that ownership in Gulf Oil project cedes to Lucky Traders in the event of default. Recom- mendation • Avoid delivery guarantees wherever possible!

  17. Advantages & disadvantages of spot contracts 98 • Spot contract: transaction of issued CERs Avantages Illustration • Maximizing carbon revenues • No post-2012 discount • Gulf oil pays a local consultant to develop the PDD & facilitate registration • The company waits for the credits to be issued, and sells them on the secondary market • Gulf oil has full control over selling strategy Disadvantages • CDM development costs borne by seller • Full exposure to CER price fluctuation • Hard to account for carbon revenues • Secondary mkt price 2012

  18. Conclusion • Market price volatility • Non-registration risk • Underdelivery • Delay,... • Multiple CDM specific risks • Fixed price ERPA: minimizes market price exposure • Revenue share ERPA: minimizes counter party risk • Delivery guarantee: increases CER price • Spot contract: maximizes CER revenues • Different structures to mitigate different risks • Only partial risk-mitigation is possible • Best strategy depends on the project characteristics & risk appetite of PO • Full understanding of risks will help informed decision • Each approach represents a trade-off

  19. South Pole contact South Pole offices South Pole Roman Schibli Project Manager MENA Phone: +41 78 908 00 62 r.schibli@southpolecarbon.com Thank you for your attention South Pole representatives Zurich

More Related