1 / 22

MMS Merged Markush Service The Questel•Orbit Alternative for Chemical Information

227 th ACS National Meeting Anaheim, CA 28 March 2004. MMS Merged Markush Service The Questel•Orbit Alternative for Chemical Information. Elliott Linder, Questel•Orbit Joe Terlizzi, Questel•Orbit. Scenario.

Download Presentation

MMS Merged Markush Service The Questel•Orbit Alternative for Chemical Information

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 227th ACS National Meeting Anaheim, CA 28 March 2004 MMSMerged Markush ServiceThe Questel•Orbit Alternative for Chemical Information Elliott Linder, Questel•Orbit Joe Terlizzi, Questel•Orbit

  2. Scenario Hypothetical Pharm X has developed a compound with the structure below, which they are finding to be a useful contraceptive in animal tests. Should they try to patent or commercialize this compound and/or its use?

  3. Scenario • What does Pharm X need to know? • Has the compound been documented or patented, i.e., is the compound really new? • Is its intended use new? • If the compound and/or its use have been patented, what is the status of the patent or patents?

  4. Search Pharm X searchers will want to check the standard chemical structure databases on key vendor systems: • CAS Registry for exact structure • MARPAT for open substitution on benzene rings or amino group • Beilstein

  5. Search • With patentability and potential infringement at stake, Pharm X also decides to extend their structure search to MMS, the Merged Markush Service from Questel·Orbit. • But what is MMS?

  6. FRONTF MPHARM WPIM BACKF MMS Coverage and Structure • Four segments • Front File (FRONTF) –from Derwent week 9816 • WPIM – 1987-1998 • MPHARM – 1987-1999 • Backfile (BACKF) – 1978-1987 (FR back to 1961) • The user can choose which segment(s) to search

  7. FRONTF MPHARM WPIM BACKF MMS Coverage and Structure • Updating MMS • Front File (Derwent) updated weekly • Back File now goes back to 1978 • No additional updates of MPHARM from year 2000

  8. Link to bibliographic files CN = Compound Number Markush query CN 1 CN 2 CN 4 CN 3 CN link CN link MMS structure file AN 1 CN 3------------ PN--------------- AN 1 CN 1-------------- PN----------------- Patent retrieval PHARM biblio file WPIL biblio file

  9. Link to bibliographic files FRONTF CN YYWW-CCCSS WPIL WPIM CN YYMMXXXX-NN MPHARM 2 CN formats PHARM BACKF BIBLIOGRAPHIC FILES MMS STRUCTURE FILE

  10. MMS Search Structure Searching Steps: • Open Imagination or STN Express. • Draw query using Query Text (QT) or import structure from Derwent’s Markush Topfrag. • Verify and exit query input. • REtrieve candidates. Candidates contain fragments of the queried structure. • Run an Atom-by-Atom search on RE candidates. • Cross to Questel·Orbit bibliographic system.

  11. Verifying MMS Structure using Imagination Steps 2 & 3

  12. MMS Search Step 4 RE search is conducted first. There are over 35,000 candidates containing structural fragments of the original query.

  13. MMS Search Step 5 When AA search is conducted, one answer is found.

  14. Search Step 6 Compound number is transferred to the PHARM database. PHARM record is as follows: AN - 83115153 CN - ***83115153-01-K***; ***83115153-01-T***; ***83115153-01-U*** PN - US4415585 - 19831115 [US4415585] AP - US35716082 19820311 [1982US-0357160] PA - UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION /Urbana/IL (US) IN - JOYCE CATHY L (US) - ZANEVELD LOURENS J (US) IC1 - A61K-031/53 IC2 - A61K-031/415 ET - Contraceptive method. Indicates known structure; further investigation required

  15. Search Pharm record –cont’d EAB - Use of pyrazolone derivatives of formula (I) wherein A is H, halo, trihalomethyl, lower C1-8 alkyl, -X-OH, -X-CO-R, -X-CO-OR, -X-SO-D, -X-S-D or -NR1R2; X is a lower (C1-C8) alkylene group; R, R1, and R2 are hydrogen, or the same or different lower alkyl groups, and B, C, and D, which can be the same or different, are phenyl, hydroxyphenyl or lower alkylphenyl, further provided that B and C together can form a chain of formula (II), as contraceptive agents. - The contraceptive method comprises maintaining in the genital tract of a female mammal a pyrazolone derivative in a concentration effective to inhibit the fertilization of ova. In addition to effectively, inhibiting the enzymes or other sperm components necessary for conception, the compounds used in the method of the invention are advantageous in having low toxic, caustic or irritating properties, so that the contraceptive compositions are suitable for long-term use without adverse side-effects.

  16. Analysis • The compound number 83115153-01, reveals that the answer is a Markush structure indexed by INPI in 1983. • The BACKF, produced by INPI, dates back to 1978 for US patents. This structure will not be found in Marpat since it only goes back to 1988. • The generic structure cannot be searched in Registry. MMS contains both specific and generic structures.

  17. Analysis • The PHARM record reveals that the retrieved patent contains many possible structures, and contains a variation of our structure, with a methyl group substituted on the fused benzene ring. • The patent assignee is the University of Illinois Foundation, and the patent was published in 1983. The compound was also used as a contraceptive. • Therefore, an infringement is possible.

  18. Analysis Some things we will need to check are: • Are there any family members, meaning has the patent been applied for and/or granted in any other countries? • What is the status of these patents, i.e., are they still valid or have they expired or lapsed? • Are there cited references that reveal any additional prior art about this compound? • Are there patents citing this patent that give us more information about this compound?

  19. Analysis • These points are easy to check using the PlusPat database on Questel•Orbit. • Using the MEM and *MEM commands, the Standardized Patent Number [XPN] is extracted and searched in PlusPat. (Standardization of the all publication, application, and priority numbers on Questel•Orbit simplifies cross-file searching.) • The FAM command is executed on the publication number, and the FAMSTAT command is used to display the family members and their LEGAL STATUS.

  20. Analysis 1/1 PlusPat - (C) QUESTEL-ORBIT- image CPIM PN - US4415585 A 19831115 [US4415585] . . 1/1 LGST - (C) EPO PN - US4415585 A 19831115 [US4415585] AP - US35716082 19820311 [1982US-0357160] ACT - 19820607 US/AS02-A ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST OWNER: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION, A CORP. OF ILL.; EFFECTIVE DATE: 19820310 - 19820607 US/AS02-A ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST OWNER: JOYCE, CATHY L.; EFFECTIVE DATE: 19820310 - 19820607 US/AS02-A ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST OWNER: ZANEVELD, LOURENS J. D.; EFFECTIVE DATE: 19820310 - 19920128 US/FP-A [-] EXPIRED DUE TO FAILURE TO PAY MAINTENANCE FEE EFFECTIVE DATE: 19911117 UP - 2003-22 FAMSTAT format. (PlusPat record edited for brevity.)

  21. Analysis • The PlusPat record reveals that there are no other family members, and the LGST record that the patent expired in 1991 due to a failure to pay the maintenance fee. • A citation analysis can be conducted on Questel•Orbit using the FAM command and FAMCITE display, that contains: • All patent families citing the source patent family • All patents families cited in the source patent family • The citation analysis can be helpful in finding additional prior art.

  22. Conclusions • In this hypothetical scenario, Pharm X has a potential opportunity due to the expiration of the patent retrieved. • In general, no single resource is sufficiently comprehensive on its own. • As many resources as possible should be searched for prior art and infringement.

More Related