1 / 21

chapter:

chapter:. 18. >>. Public Goods and Common Resources. Krugman/Wells Economics. ©2009  Worth Publishers. A way to classify goods that predicts whether or not a good is a private good — a good that can be efficiently provided by free markets

yukio
Download Presentation

chapter:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. chapter: 18 >> Public Goods and Common Resources Krugman/Wells Economics ©2009  Worth Publishers

  2. A way to classify goods that predicts whether or not a good is a private good—a good that can be efficiently provided by free markets • What public goods are, and why markets fail to supply them • What common resources are, and why they are overused • What artificially scarce goods are, and why they are under-consumed

  3. How government intervention in the production and consumption of these types of goods can make society better off • Why finding the right level of government intervention is difficult

  4. Private Goods—and Others • What’s the difference between installing a new bathroom in a house and building a municipal sewage system? • What’s the difference between growing wheat and fishing in the open ocean? • In each case there is a basic difference in the characteristics of the goods involved.

  5. Characteristics of Goods • Goods can be classified according to two attributes: • whether they are excludable • whether they are rival in consumption • A good is excludable if the supplier of that good can prevent people who do not pay from consuming it. • A good is rival in consumption if the same unit of the good cannot be consumed by more than one person at the same time.

  6. Characteristics of Goods • A good that is both excludable and rival in consumption is a private good. • When a good is nonexcludable,the supplier cannot prevent consumption by people who do not pay for it. • A good is nonrival in consumption if more than one person can consume the same unit of the good at the same time.

  7. Characteristics of Goods • There are four types of goods: • Private goods, which are excludable and rival in consumption, like wheat • Public goods, which are nonexcludable and nonrival in consumption, like a public sewer system • Common resources, which are nonexcludable but rival in consumption, like clean water in a river • Artificially scarce goods, which are excludable but nonrival in consumption, like pay-per-view movies on cable TV

  8. Characteristics of Goods Rival in consumption Nonrival in consumption Private goods Artificially scarce goods • Wheat • Pay-per-view movies Excludable • Bathroom fixtures • Computer software Common resources Public goods Non-excludable • Clean water • Public sanitation • Biodiversity • National defense

  9. Why Markets Can Supply Only Private Goods Efficiently • Goods that are both excludable and rival in consumption are private goods. • Private goods can be efficiently produced and consumed in a competitive market.

  10. Why Markets Can Supply Only Private Goods Efficiently • Goods that are nonexcludablesuffer from the free-rider problem: individuals have no incentive to pay for their own consumption and instead will take a “free ride” on anyone who does pay. • When goods are nonrival in consumption, the efficient price for consumption is zero. • If a positive price is charged to compensate producers for the cost of production, the result is inefficiently low consumption.

  11. Common Resources • A common resource is nonexcludable and rival in consumption: you can’t stop me from consuming the good, and more consumption by me means less of the good available for you. • Some examples of common resources are clean air and water as well as the diversity of animal and plant species on the planet (biodiversity). • In each of these cases, the fact that the good, though rival in consumption, is nonexcludable poses a serious problem.

  12. The Problem of Overuse • Common resources left to the free market suffer from overuse. • Overuse occurs when a user depletes the amount of the common resource available to others but does not take this cost into account when deciding how much to use the common resource. • In the case of a common resource, the marginal social cost of my use of that resource is higher than my individual marginal cost or the cost to me of using an additional unit of the good. • The following figure illustrates this point…

  13. A Common Resource Price of fish MSC O P OPT S E M K T P MKT D Q Q Quantity of fish OPT MKT

  14. The Efficient Use and Maintenance of a Common Resource • To ensure efficient use of a common resource, society must find a way of getting individual users of the resource to take into account the costs they impose on other users. • Like negative externalities, a common resource can be efficiently managed by: • a tax or a regulation imposed on the use of the common resource. • making it excludable and assigning property rights to it. • creating a system of tradable licenses for the right to use the common resource.

  15. Artificially Scarce Goods • An artificially scarce goodis excludable but nonrival in consumption. • Because the good is nonrival in consumption, the efficient price to consumers is zero. • However, because it is excludable, sellers charge a positive price, which leads to inefficiently low consumption.

  16. Artificially Scarce Goods • A good is made artificially scarce because producers charge a positive price. • The marginal cost of allowing one more person to consume the good is zero. • The problems of artificially scarce goods are similar to those posed by a natural monopoly.

  17. An Artificially Scarce Good Price of pay-per-view movie Deadweight loss $4 D 0 Q Q MKT OPT Quantity of pay-per-view movies watched

  18. 1.Goods may be classified according to whether or not theyare excludable and whether or not they are rival inconsumption. 2.Free markets can deliver efficient levels of productionand consumption for private goods,which are bothexcludable and rival in consumption. 3.When goods are nonexcludable,there is a free-riderproblem:consumers will not pay for the good, leadingto inefficiently low production. When goods are nonrivalin consumption,they should be free, and any positiveprice leads to inefficiently low consumption.

  19. A public good is nonexcludable and nonrival inconsumption. In most cases a public good must be suppliedby the government. The marginal social benefit of a publicgood is equal to the sum of the individual marginalbenefits to each consumer. The efficient quantity of apublic good is the quantity at which marginal social benefitequals the marginal cost of providing the good. Like apositive externality, marginal social benefit is greaterthan any one individual’s marginal benefit, so no individualis willing to provide the efficient quantity. • One rationale for the presence of government is that itallows citizens to tax themselves in order to provide publicgoods. Governments use cost-benefit analysis todetermine the efficient provision of a public good.

  20. 6.A common resource is rival in consumption but nonexcludable. It is subject to overuse,because an individualdoes not take into account the fact that his or her usedepletes the amount available for others. This is similarto the problem of a negative externality: the marginalsocial cost of an individual’s use of a common resource isalways higher than his or her individual marginal cost.Pigouvian taxes, the creation of a system of tradablelicenses, or the assignment of property rights are possiblesolutions.

  21. 7.Artificially scarce goods are excludable but nonrival inconsumption. Because no marginal cost arises from allowing another individual to consume the good, the efficient price is zero. A positive price compensates the producer for the cost of production but leads to inefficiently low consumption. The problem of an artificially scarce good is similar to that of a natural monopoly.

More Related