120 likes | 244 Views
This document explores the capacity gaps in Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) systems within rural development ministries. It provides a framework for institutionalizing effective M&E practices, highlighting the importance of a structured program that includes planning, budgeting, monitoring, evaluation, and reporting. The findings are based on insights garnered from the 3rd APCOP-MfRD Results-Based M&E Workshop held in Phnom Penh from June 28-30, 2011. Emphasis is placed on human resource development, aligning M&E systems between government and development partners, and ensuring adequate budgeting for M&E activities.
E N D
Identifying Capacity Gaps in M&E Developing Framework M&E Attribute 5 Institutionalization of M&E Systems in Rural Development Ministries 3rd APCOP-MfRD Results-Based M&E Workshop Phnom Penh 28-30 June 2011
Contents 1- M&E System 2- Program Structure 3- Planning and Budgeting Preparation 4- Monitoring & Evaluation Practices 5- Reporting System 6- Identifying Capacity Gaps
Program Structure (cont.) Source: M&E Manual
3- Planning & Budgeting Preparation Planning Process
5- Reporting System M&E Process & Reporting:
6- Identifying Capacity Gaps in M&E System Institution Human Resource Development Budget
Identifying Capacity Gaps (cont.) • Institution: • Harmonized M&E systems (Govt.&DPs) • Each entity’s M&E establishment is Different place (Role and function) • Organizational structure reform
Identifying Capacity Gaps (cont.) • HRD: • Limited number of staff to carry out M&E • New promotion/nomination • Limited in receiving training
Identifying Capacity Gaps (cont.) • Budget: • Limited budget to carry out M&E (Data and information collection, field observation/survey…)