1 / 11

ONLINE GAMBLING

ONLINE GAMBLING. BALANCING FREE TRADE & SOCIAL POLICY. What is Online Gambling & Who is ‘at it’?. Gaming, Betting, Lotteries, Prize Competitions The concept of remote gambling Statistics. EXAMPLES. Example Betting Example Horse-racing Example Online poker

xanthus
Download Presentation

ONLINE GAMBLING

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ONLINE GAMBLING BALANCING FREE TRADE & SOCIAL POLICY

  2. What is Online Gambling & Who is ‘at it’? • Gaming, Betting, Lotteries, Prize Competitions • The concept of remote gambling • Statistics

  3. EXAMPLES • Example Betting • Example Horse-racing • Example Online poker • Example Virtual horse-racing • Example Virtual race horse breeding

  4. Risks associated with Online Gambling &Regulatory Objectives • Problem gambling & addiction • Harm for individual and society • Minors • Crime associated with (some) gambling operations (fraud, money laundering) • Consumer Protection • Ensuring gambling is conducted fairly and openly

  5. Different Regulatory Models • Outright prohibition of online Gambling • Workable? • US Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act 2006 • State operator monopoly • Eg Svenska Spel or Norsk Tipping (games); Norsk Rikstoto (horse race betting) • Single private operator • Eg Pari Mutuel Urbain in France • Restricted licensing system • Open licensing system • Eg UK Gambling Act 2005

  6. National Regulation as Trade Restriction • Divergent laws, no harmonisation, no country of origin rule • Excluded from scope of Services Directive, E-commerce Directive etc • The internet & cross-border access • EU Treaty, Arts 43 and 49 (freedom to provide services & establishment) • Direct effect => lever for harmonisation?? • Role of the courts in the absence of harmonisation?

  7. The Caselaw of the ECJ (1) • Case C-275/92 Schindler • Case C-124/97 Lärää • Case C-67/98Zenatti -------------------------------------------------- • Case C-234/01 Gambelli • Case C-338/04 Placanica (6. March 2007) • Case E-1/06 Re Amendment to Game & Lottery Law (14. March 2007) • Case E-3/06 Ladbrokes v Norway (30. May 2007)

  8. The Caselaw of the ECJ (2) • Jurisprudence under Art 234 (Prelim Ref) • Commission infringement procedure Art 226 • Notification against Denmark, Germany, Finland, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden and Hungary (April 2006) • Austria and Luxembourg (December 2006) • Commission expressing concerns on the German Inter-State Treaty in March 2007 • Internet prohibition for sports bets and lotteries

  9. What do the national courts do with this Guidance from the ECJ? • The PMU v Zeturf case as an example • Situation following Gambelli & Placanica: • PMUv Zeturf : Court of Appeal, Paris: (1) ordering cessation of operations; (2) quantifying the penalty amount due by Zeturf • Maltese courts refuse enforcement • French Cour de Cassation: Reversed to CA (13. July 2007)

  10. GATS-WTO • DS 285 Antigua & Barbuda v United States • Cross-border online gambling services • Panel Report November 2004 • Appellate Body Report April 2005 • US not complied: February 2007

  11. Conclusion • Online gambling growth sector => pressure to liberalise cross-border provision • Potential for social & individual harm => risk assessment specific to online gambling • Enforcement issues pertaining to national regulation (arrests; payment providers) • Harmonisation unlikely • Role of the ECJ/WTO in determining the limits of social policy • Proportionality test • But application by the national courts? • Result: Litigation battle

More Related