1 / 9

Progress Report Team # 17 Michael Bunne , John Jagusztyn , and Jonathan Lenoff

Progress Report Team # 17 Michael Bunne , John Jagusztyn , and Jonathan Lenoff Department of Mechanical Engineering, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL Project Sponsor:. Project Advisors: Dr. Emmanuel G. Collins, Ph.D Department of Mechanical Engineering Dr. Oscar Chuy , Ph.D

woods
Download Presentation

Progress Report Team # 17 Michael Bunne , John Jagusztyn , and Jonathan Lenoff

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Progress Report Team # 17 Michael Bunne, John Jagusztyn, and Jonathan Lenoff Department of Mechanical Engineering, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL Project Sponsor: Project Advisors: Dr. Emmanuel G. Collins, Ph.D Department of Mechanical Engineering Dr. Oscar Chuy, Ph.D Department of Mechanical Engineering

  2. Introduction • Problem Statement • The current generation of assistive walking devices is limited in their traversable terrain and functionality. • Indoor operation only • Only perform basic functions • Scooters / electric wheelchairs unnecessary or expensive • Proposed Solution • Develop a walking assistive device designed to actively assist the user in both indoor and outdoor maneuverability. • Further empower the disabled and elderly community • Offer wide-range of assistive functions • Maintain ease of use and intuitiveness integral to current generation walkers 1 of 7

  3. Criteria • Versatility • Robustness • User-friendliness • Indoor operation • Outdoor operation • Cost • Weight Specifications • Frame • Resemble current generation walker in aesthetics and standards • Aluminum framing • Supports up to 300 pounds • Adjustable heights between 32 and 39 inches • Adjustable handle width between 14 and 23 inches • Propulsion • Minimum 11 inch diameter wheels or tracks • Travel over all indoor surfaces, grass, gravel… • Travel up or down slopes up to 10 ° • Move transversely 45° from the center axis • Maximum operating speed of 3 mph • Control & Function • Intuitive user input • Force-based drive control • Fall Prevention • Sit-Down/Stand-Up Assistance • Object Detection/Avoidance • Localization & Navigation 2 of 7

  4. Initial Designs 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 3 of 7

  5. Interim Designs • Problems: • Large footprint • Tight user space • Non-uniform suspensions • Solutions: • Eliminate angled suspension • Four-wheeled design • Uniform suspension • Truly Modular 4 of 7

  6. Uniform Suspension Truly Modular Final Design Suspension: 5 of 7

  7. Design Overhaul • Handle Redesign/Parts Ordering • Steering Motor Specs/Ordering • Driving Motor/Wheels Ordering • Battery Specs/Ordering • Magnetic Encoder Ordering Current Status 6 of 7

  8. Updated Timeline 7 of 7

  9. Questions?

More Related