Download
introduction to health behavior theories n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Introduction to Health Behavior Theories PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Introduction to Health Behavior Theories

Introduction to Health Behavior Theories

324 Views Download Presentation
Download Presentation

Introduction to Health Behavior Theories

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Introduction to Health Behavior Theories

  2. Let’s Recap…

  3. Factors That Influence Behavior-Change Decisions

  4. Self-Monitoring • Become aware of your behavior pattern and targets of influence (change) • Monitor • Behaviors: drinks, steps, miles, calories, carbs, etc • Targets of influence: determine how frequent they occur, when, where and record • Start with a clear baseline for later comparison

  5. Overcoming Obstacles to Behavior Change

  6. Goal of Health Promotion Health promotion -- process of enabling people to increase control over their health behaviors…to improve their health.

  7. Health Promotion Questions • Why do people behave in unhealthy (or healthy) ways? • What strategies are appropriate to: • A: discourage risky behaviors? • B: encourage healthy behaviors? • C: assure healthy social and physical environments?

  8. Health Behavior Theories • Guide the search for "why" health-related behaviors occur • Identify points for possible change

  9. Introduction to Key Terms

  10. What comes to mind when you hear the word theory? Jot down brief thoughts, beliefs, descriptions that immediately surface to this question…

  11. Theory…? • The term carries with it, loaded meanings • Something abstract • Assumptions about things • Empirical generalizations - hypotheses • Causal explanations for certain phenomena • A scholarly “school-of-thought” • Models or conceptual frameworks

  12. There are two faces to theory • Commonsense theories • Scientific theories

  13. Commonsense Theories “Explanations” we invoke (on a daily basis) to make sense of events we encounter in our lives – sense-making (conspiracy theories) Case 1: Past couple of weeks, my graduate assistants’ behavior “seems a little off.” She arrives late for team meetings, and appears distant and broody when the team interacts. I have an “explanation” for her behavior: -She has been under considerable stress, taking her comprehensive exam, and finalizing a manuscript to submit for publication. My explanation is considered a commonsense theory as it represents a personal attempt to make sense (meaning) of a situation based on the information at hand.

  14. Scientific Theories • Are more elaborate • Contain more clearly outlined characteristics • Have a defined purpose

  15. General Scientific Theories • Definitions… …A set of universal statements that furnish an explanation by means of a deductive system (Norman Denzin, 1970) …a set of interrelated propositions that allow us to explain how and why events occur. It is constructed with several basic building blocks: concepts/ constructs, variables, and statements (Turner, 1986)

  16. Scientific Health Behavior Theories Behavioral health theories are… …composed of interrelated propositions, based on stated assumptions that tie selected constructs together and create a parsimonious system for explaining and predicting human behavior (DiClemente et al. 2002) ... a set of interrelated concepts, definitions, and propositions that present a systematic view of situations by specifying relations among variables, in order to explain and predict the situations (Glanz et al. 2008)

  17. Let’s break down these definitions into smaller units. What are some core elements across all of them?

  18. Description: theories facilitate the description and understanding of phenomenon being studied so that others can test (and repeat) such descriptions with. • Prediction: extends beyond mere description. Theories allow for the construction of interrelated propositions (hypotheses) that make predictions (claims) of why phenomenon (relationships) occur. • Explanation: theories permit the explanation of observed events in a logical, ordered, and interconnected manner.

  19. Other Common Components • Concepts/Constructs • Variables • Hypotheses

  20. Concepts & Constructs • The abstract units that logically build a theory. Often used interchangeably. • Ideas or notions (that have been “branded into a theory with a technical name”) that are typically “unobservable or latent” • Examples? • Self-efficacy, perceived severity, social norms

  21. Variables • Concepts/constructs are operationalized (defined) into “measurable” or “observable” terms called variables • Referred to as the “proxy” for the concept/construct and can take on two or more values. • Example? • Self-efficacy– cannot see but can measure it – perceived ability or skill in certain behavior

  22. Hypotheses • Helps connect the theoretical dots with empirical assumptions about phenomenon we would expect to observe. • Associations between two or more constructs • Hypotheses (or assumptions of associations between two or more constructs – measured as variables) can be “tested”… • Ho: no association • H1: association

  23. Now that we have definitions under out belt, how do theories work? • Need to engage in the “theorizing process…” …which is more than simply thinking about descriptions, explanations or predictions…

  24. Theorizing or Theoretical Thinking • Is a dynamic process of theory building… Asking and Answering specific types of questions Predicting and Analyzing (testing) specific research questions & hypotheses

  25. Depending on HOW constructs and hypotheses are connected, different explanations for health behavior emerge Quilt Blocks Theory “building” is like Quilting

  26. Theoretical Thinking Answer Question Why? How? When? What for? Explanations structured logically “Because….” “Given X, then Y…” “For…” The Theorizing Process

  27. You may be asking yourself… Why should we think theoretically about health promotion? Isn’t observing and collecting data related to public health issues and delivering health education practice, enough? Because our field is “applied,” why do we need to consider theory in our practice?

  28. Reason 1 Because theoretical thinking… …infuses ethics and social justice into health education practice

  29. The Tuskegee Study Study Timeframe: 1932-1972 Study Goal: to determine the long-term course of syphilis in the absence of treatment and to note the peculiarities of the disease in black men in particular (as there was widespreadbelief among MDs that blacks responded differently to disease than did whites). Study Sample: conducted among a group of 600 black men (399 syphilis cases, 201 controls) Study Site: Men from Macon County, Alabama - which exhibited the highest syphilis rates in the U.S. at the time. Hence was seen as a “natural lab” by Tuskegee Institute (worked with govt to obtain needed resources).

  30. What Happened… • To lure into study, men were told they were sick b/c they suffered from “bad blood.” NONE told that they had syphilis. • Later when tx for syphilis (penicillin) became available 10 yrs later (in 1943), it was withheld from those who had it. • Initially imagined as a 6-month study, it lasted until 1972 - for 40 years

  31. Aftermath of Tuskegee Study Characterized as one of the most infamous man-made tragedies in the history of American Science that “breeched ethical principles in conducting research” 65 yrs later, on May 16, 1997, Pres Bill Clinton apologized in the name of the US Govt to the handful of survivors & their families gathered at the white house for the event. He stated… …“the people who ran the study at Tuskegee diminished the stature of man by abandoning the most basic ethical precepts – they forgot their pledge to health and repair”

  32. You may ask…how on earth? • This was a time when a “code of ethics” outlining the protection of human subjects in research were virtually non-existent… • Rather, research & practice was based on the medical way: • A process of “peer-review” with emphasis on “preserving professional autonomy” (not with ensuring ethical research or defining good practice) and • Medicine, at the time, was a profession (MDs and techs) “almost wholly composed of people uninterested in theorizing” Jones, 1993

  33. Relevance to Health Education Practice? • Ethical misconduct occurred b/c medical professionals ignored theory (as they were trained to practice, collect data, and adhere to methods). • Because theorizing facilitates the groundwork for ethics and promotion of social justice within any profession…it’s very relevant to health promotion given that ethics and social justice are major goals promoted within the practice.

  34. Reason 2 Because theoretical thinking… …represents a moral duty and professional responsibility for health promotion practice

  35. Notion of Professional Responsibility • Health promotion professionals are held accountable for adhering to “codes of ethical conduct” and professional competencies (AKA: professional standards). • Seven core competencies have been defined by the National Commission for Health Education Credentialing (NCHEC). • Theorizing is a professional standard embedded within 6 of the 7 areas of responsibility (as tasks). Examples: • “Identify diverse factors that influence health behaviors, i.e., theorizing about cause and effect relationships” (Area I, Sub-Competency C) • “Identify factors that foster or hinder the process of health education” (Area I, Sub-competency E)

  36. Reason 3 Because theoretical thinking… …guides the practice of health promotion

  37. For you as a public health professional “in-training” • The “theorizing process” is a valuable tool needed for the work you are setting out to do…

  38. Importance of Theory-Practice Link • Theory is a tool for making systematic connectionsbetween: • assessment of a health problem; • program components; and • program evaluation

  39. Why, in the current public health environment, is it increasingly important to demonstrate these connections?

  40. Health Behavior (and change) is Complex • Health behavior change interventions are not end-all be-all cures… …record of success in behavioral change for HP 2010 objectives are not 100% successful. • Illustration: prevalence of adolescent obesity tripled in the past 30 years. Most childhood interventions are rooted in theories of health behavior change. In a review of recent programs, only 3 interventions significantly impacted weight. Given the limited success of most childhood obesity interventions, alternative approaches need to be explored (Chehab et al., 2007).

  41. Reason 4 Because theoretical thinking… …prevents ideological takeover in health promotion practice

  42. Roots of Health Behavior Theories • Primary fields from which most current health behavior theories come: • Psychology • Sociology • Anthropology • Communications • Others… • There is much overlap between these disciplines in explaining behavior

  43. BEHAVIORIST PSYCHOLOGY • ASSUMPTION: Behavior is learned through a process of stimulus and response. “Thinking” not a major part of this process. • Early focus on classical conditioning (Pavlov’s dog), then on operant conditioning (Skinner) -- the conditioning of behavior by positive and negative reinforcements. Idea of shaping behavior via behavior modification. • Behavior modification technique still used (smoking cessation, addiction, eating disorders, gambling, etc) • Basic assumptions about learning behavior through positive and negative reinforcements appear in a number of health behavior theories.

  44. COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY • Focus on the THINKING PROCESSES • THINKING PROCESSES include beliefs, perception, memory, decision-making, interpretation, reasoning, judgment, etc. • Some cognitive psychologists focused solely on the development of the thinking process (piaget) • See influence of cognitive psychology focus in many of health behavior theories

  45. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY • Social psychology focuses on the interaction between individuals and the group (relationships, social units) • See this influence on health behavior theories.

  46. SOCIOLOGY • Sociology includes the study of society and its phenomena – social groups, social hierarchies, social structures, the nature of social interaction and organization, the interaction between social and economic systems. • Much of this study is also present in many health behavior theories in terms of the relationship between (social class/hierarchy, group norms, social organization and its impact on behavior).

  47. CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY • Focus on the role of culture in human behavior, the ways in which life-patterns are organized, together with systems of knowledge and belief, language and symbol. • This may include: cultural beliefs, attitudes, social-cultural roles, gender, language, symbolic expression, social authority and legitimacy, health knowledge systems, healing practices, healers, etc. • Cultural anthropology has much influence on health behavior theories  cultural influence on health behaviors, values and meanings as connected to behavior, cultural constructions of disease and illness.

  48. Health Promotion Ideologies • Even though public health is an “applied field” that borrows much from these other disciplines, it is vital that health promotion professionals remain critically reflective about the processes by which health behavior theories are translated into PH mainstream • If health promotion ideology in terms of health behavior theories is not being construed and shaped by the health promotion workforce itself, then other ideologies- developed by others outside the field will fill the void. • In other words, if we don’t theorize in our practice, we will fall prey to “being practiced & theorized” by other disciplines in the social science field.

  49. Reason 5 Because theoretical thinking… …builds scientific knowledge in health promotion practice

  50. Where’s the scientific structure? • In the absence of theory, the knowledge base in health promotion developed via research is not critically grounded and merely a collection of loosely derived nuggets of information (without logical or ordered meaning). • Need to move beyond mere descriptions of events (which is the role of epidemiology - data/inquiries)