1 / 11

Learning from Experience: Reflections from New Standards Review Teams

Learning from Experience: Reflections from New Standards Review Teams. Lynne Richardson Miller College of Business Ball State University 13 July 2004 SBAA Summer Meeting . “New”Accreditation Standards. Strategic Management Participants Assurance of Learning . Preparation. Annually

wilbur
Download Presentation

Learning from Experience: Reflections from New Standards Review Teams

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Learning from Experience: Reflections from New Standards Review Teams Lynne Richardson Miller College of Business Ball State University 13 July 2004 SBAA Summer Meeting

  2. “New”Accreditation Standards • Strategic Management • Participants • Assurance of Learning

  3. Preparation Annually • Refine strategic management plan • Prepare annual maintenance report • Participate in AACSB accreditation data collection Up to 3 years out • Accredited member submits request for review with preferred visit dates

  4. Time Table continued Within two years of review: • Accredited member and MAC choose peer review team (PRT) • Visit date is set • Accredited member provides PRT with strategic mgmt plan, annual maintenance reports, policies and executive summary • School and PRT confer to determine any additional info needed prior to visit

  5. PRT Visit! • The visit team generally arrives the evening of one day and departs by noon two days later. • PRT members may “split up” to cover more ground. • Before the PRT leaves, the dean and university leadership know the team’s recommendations.

  6. Host Dean Evaluations 03-04 • Pre-visit experience 6.0 • Visit experience 6.6 • Post-visit experience 6.6 (scale is 1-7, 7 is highest)

  7. CAO Evaluations 03-04 • Pre-visit experience 6.0 • Visit experience 6.9 • Post-visit experience 6.3 (scale is 1-7, 7 is highest)

  8. PRT Evaluations 03-04 • Pre-visit experience 6.2 • Visit experience 6.3 • Post-visit experience 6.7 (scale is 1-7, 7 is highest)

  9. Consultative Process • PRT is looking for BEST PRACTICES to share. • School should receive suggestions for continuous improvement.

  10. So what happens during the visit?

  11. Questions/experiences?

More Related