1 / 32

ENGINEERING / PLANNING ISSUES IN BIKE ADVOACY

Learn about the importance of mode share, the low-stress network, and innovative solutions in planning and advocating for bike infrastructure. Discover how to create safe, practical, and cost-effective bike networks to encourage greater ridership.

wilbertv
Download Presentation

ENGINEERING / PLANNING ISSUES IN BIKE ADVOACY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ENGINEERING / PLANNING ISSUES IN BIKE ADVOACY ADVOCATE FOR INFRASTRUCTURE THAT IS PRACTICAL AND COST-EFFECTIVE TO ENCOURAGE GREATER RIDERSHIP Anthony Fernandez, P.E. ASF Consulting (City of Madison, Engineering Div. - Retired) Oops! That’s not a bicycle…)

  2. Major Themes of Presentation • Measure Success in Mode Share, not Miles • Focus on the “Low-Stress” Network to Attract New Riders • Embrace Innovation But Don’t Overlook Basic Network of Local Streets • Move Beyond “Complete Streets” to Complete Networks • Look for Solutions With “Greater-Than-Zero-Sum” Benefits • Understand Engineering Concerns and Published Resources to Create Safe, Practical and Cost-Effective Solutions

  3. Mode Share Matters • Safety is the most important factor to increase ridership. • Consider location, ease of access and especially continuity • Good data as well as first-hand experience crucial in planning and advocacy

  4. Mode Share Matters Safety is the most important factor to increase ridership. • Perception is critical • Primarily means separation from fast vehicular traffic • Good visual clues and directional guidance

  5. Mode Share Matters Consider location, access and especially continuity • Railroads, waterways freeways: barriers and opportunities • Convenient access is crucial to success • Route judged by its most difficult segment

  6. Mode Share Matters Good data plus first-hand experience are critical to planning and advocacy • Data supports public acceptance and recognition • No substitute for on-the-ground experience and input from riders • Gap identification G

  7. Focus on “Low-Stress” Network • Wide range of user characteristics • LOS vs. “Low Stress” • Understanding bikes as separate mode from pedestrians • Importance of special marking, signing and other visual treatment

  8. Focus on “Low-Stress” Network Separate rights-of-way: Shared-Use Paths • High functionality but difficult to locate, complete corridors • Interface with street network is critical • “Backbone” but not complete network

  9. Focus on “Low-Stress” Network On-Street physically separated from traffic: Protected Bike Lanes • One-Way, Two-Way Counter-directional • Distinct from “side paths” • Challenges and limitations • NACTO for more info

  10. Focus on “Low-Stress” Network “Bike Boulevards” or “Bike Priority Streets • Defined by special control devices, marking, signing and visual treatment • Volume Management • Speed Management • No widely-accepted definition or criteria

  11. Innovation + Local Street Network Can be re-imagined in innovative ways while fulfilling all functions • High public acceptance • Potential for more green space • Applicable to typical narrow rights-of-way

  12. Innovation + Local Street Network Local streets are a core element of network but often overlooked • Provide property access, parking while moderating speed and priority • Bike-Only links provide continuity without car volume

  13. Innovation + Local Street Network Low speed, low volume local streets are a core element often overlooked • Enhance with marking, signing, other visual clues • Improve pavement condition and winter maintenance

  14. Innovation + Local Street Network Create New Bike-Only Links for Continuity • Maintains low volume, low speed characteristics • No negative impacts on MV mobility • Often inexpensive

  15. Complete Networks and Streets • Mobility, access, safety and efficiency guide the process • Flexible, practical approach tailored to specific community • Mapping and analysis needs • Importance of informed advocacy to identify gaps

  16. Complete Networks and Streets Mobility, access, safety and efficiency guide the process • Big projects needed to overcome big barriers (Beltline) • Projects sometimes opportunity-driven • Function in network justifies investment

  17. Complete Networks and Streets Flexible, practical approach for specific community and location • Well designed at-grade crossings: superior access at low cost / R.O.W. • Wide median refuge at high-volume crossings

  18. Complete Networks and Streets Mapping and analysis: GIS is providing new and powerful tools • Need flexibility to combine on- and off-street, low-stress on single map • Assist with gap analysis, public communication

  19. Complete Networks and Streets Mapping and analysis: GIS providing new and powerful tools • Layers for ownership R.O.W., Parks etc. • No substitute for “ground” experience, informed advocates, designers/planners

  20. Greater Than Zero-Sum Benefits • Bike mobility does not come at expense of other modes • Especially consider pedestrian needs • Critical to public acceptance and continued investment in bike infrastructure

  21. Greater Than Zero-Sum Benefits Bike mobility does not come at expense of other modes • Counter-directional bike lane on one-way street enhances bike mobility without affecting autos • Often requires flexibility, creativity

  22. Greater Than Zero-Sum Benefits Bike mobility does not come at expense of other modes • Colored pavement provides safety and confidence for biker • Clear definition of bike space assists drivers as well

  23. Greater Than Zero-Sum Benefits Bike mobility does not come at expense of other modes • European model: provide separate space for bikes and pedestrians • Improves experience for both • Visually intuitive

  24. Engineering Issues / Resources • Transitions and intersections more complex than X-C • Don’t let “perfect” be enemy of the “good” • Design standards are for safety and user comprehension, not bureaucracy • Newer standards are innovative, flexible

  25. Engineering Issues / Resources Intersections, transitions are more complex than typical section • Consider all allowed movements • Visit site, understand unique conditions • Seek professional guidance on safety standards

  26. Engineering Issues / Resources Don’t let “perfect” be the enemy of the “good” • Bike speed or priority may have to be secondary to safety • Avoid creating high stress or perceived unsafe conditions • Understand needs of other modes

  27. Useful Engineering and Planning Resources AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities - 2012 • The “Bible” for geometric and design standards for separate paths and on-street facilities • Updated infrequently and not generally seen as cutting edge of innovation • Authoritative and “adopted” by many States

  28. Engineering Issues / Resources NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide • Indispensable guide to innovative design • Primarily on-line resource but available in paper • Authoritative and informative but not “adopted”

  29. Useful Engineering and Planning Resources WisDOT Bicycle Facility Design Handbook - 2004 • Official geometric and design standards for separate paths and on-street facilities for WisDOT or federally funded projects in WI • More detailed guidance than AASHTO on many topics • Updated infrequently and not completely current with recent innovative ideas

  30. Useful Engineering and Planning Resources Fundamentals of Bicycle Boulevard Planning & Design - 2009 • Unofficial but authoritative and useful information on one strategy • Example of many resources supplementing official guidance with innovative ideas • Recommend NACTO for more current info

  31. Useful Engineering and Planning Resources CROW Design Manual for Bicycle Traffic - 2007 • Official manual in the Netherlands and widely used in Europe • Good source of innovative ideas from places with very high bicycle mode share • Use with caution as some concepts may not be applicable in US cities.

  32. ENGINEERING / PLANNING ISSUES IN BIKE ADVOACY THANKS FOR LISTENING! QUESTIONS? Anthony Fernandez, P.E. ASF Consulting (City of Madison, Engineering Div. - Retired) (That’s closer…)

More Related