1 / 4

Next Step Discussion draft-liu-bonica-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem

Next Step Discussion draft-liu-bonica-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem. Comments Received on Monday. Might need to split the problem v 6ops relevant a set of guidance for the OPS people to eliminate the impact as much as possible 6man relevant

whitley
Download Presentation

Next Step Discussion draft-liu-bonica-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Next Step Discussiondraft-liu-bonica-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem

  2. Comments Received on Monday Might need to split the problem • v6ops relevant • a set of guidance for the OPS people to eliminate the impact as much as possible • 6man relevant • A PS from v6ops to 6man to initiate some potential standard revision

  3. Comments Received on Monday A stand-alone PS make sense both for… • v6ops • to inform cautions of the varied behavior of hosts • Impact to some operation/management (This is also the basic goalof the draft) • 6man • to inform the ambiguity in current standards

  4. Next Step Alternatives • Adopted as a stand-alone PS soon +Initial another document to figure out • Which problems are the implementation errors • BCP guidance to implementors/operators • ambiguities in the standards, which 6man should fix (might have arguments and long discussion) • Adopted as aPS integrated with some guidance Q: Which one do you prefer?

More Related