1 / 69

ASSIMILATION OF IMAGES FOR GEOPHYSICAL FLUIDS

ASSIMILATION OF IMAGES FOR GEOPHYSICAL FLUIDS. François-Xavier Le Dimet Arthur Vidard Innocent Souopgui Université Joseph Fourier and INRIA, Grenoble. NASA, JPL,January 2011 . ADDISA Research Group. CLIME INRIA Paris Météo France Institut de Mathématiques, Université de Toulouse

wes
Download Presentation

ASSIMILATION OF IMAGES FOR GEOPHYSICAL FLUIDS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ASSIMILATION OFIMAGES FOR GEOPHYSICAL FLUIDS François-Xavier Le Dimet Arthur Vidard Innocent Souopgui Université Joseph Fourier and INRIA, Grenoble NASA, JPL,January 2011

  2. ADDISA Research Group • CLIME INRIA Paris • Météo France • Institut de Mathématiques, Université de Toulouse • LEGI, Grenoble • MOISE INRIA Grenoble and Université de Grenoble

  3. SUMMARY • Observing the Earthwith satellites. • Data Assimilation. • Images. • Plugging images intonumericalmodels. • Variationalapproach. • Pseudo-Observationsmethods. • Direct Assimilation of Images Sequences. • Operational Applications • Perspectives

  4. Data Assimilation • Numericalmodels are not sufficient to carry out a prediction. • Numericalmodels are based on non linearPDE’s and after a spatial discretisation a system of first orderODE’s of hugedimensionnality (at the present time around one billions of equations for operationalmodels. • Predictionisobtained by an integration of the model startingfrom an initial condition. • The processnecessary for obtaining an initial condition from data isnamed Data Assimilation

  5. Data Assimilation (2) • Basicallyit’s a ill-posedproblem : about 10 millions of daily data to retrieve 1 billions of unknowns • Interpolation methods are not sufficient to obtain consistant fields (with respect to fluiddynamics) • VariationalMethods are based on Optimal Control Methods and are presentlyused by the main meteorologicalcenters • Kalmanfilterapproachisused in mainly in a researchcontext

  6. Assimilation of Images • Images provided by the observation of the earthquantity a large amount of information • This information isused in a qualitative wayratherthan in a quantitative one. • How to couple this source of information withmathematicalmodels in order to improveprediction?

  7. 27 satellite data sources used in 4D-Var DMSP SSM/I NOAA AMSUA/B HIRS, AQUA AIRS SCATTEROMETERS GEOS TERRA / AQUA MODIS OZONE ICTMA 13

  8. Number ofData used per Day ICTMA 13

  9. Images • Images are defined by pixels • For black and white image each pixel isassociatedwith a greylevel (0<gl<1). For Meteosat 256 greylevels • For color images each pixel isassociated to 3 numbers. • Each image (Meteosat) has around 25 millions of pixels. • A full sequence of images is a very large data set and cannotbedirectlyused in an operationalcontext

  10. Whatisseen ? • The basic variables of meteorologicalmodels are : wind, temperature, humidity, atmospheric pressure onlyhumiditycanbeseen on some satellites. • For oceanicmodels : stream, temperature, salinity, surface elevation. Onlysalinity and temperaturegive images. • For the atmosphere the images represent the integral of the radiative properties of the atmosphere. • For the ocean the images represent the surface values of the radiative properties of the ocean • Information in images is borne by the discontinuities in the images (e.g. fronts) • Images of the oceancanbeocculted by clouds.

  11. Experimentalframework: Coriolis Rotating Platform

  12. MathematicalModels for GeophysicalFlows • Based on laws of conservation (mass, energy) • NonlinearPDE’slinking the state variables of the model • To use images itisnecessary to introduce the evolution of the quantitiesdispalyed by images: • Humidity (for meteorologicalmodels) • Salinity (for oceanicmodels) • Conservation of a (supposed to be) passive tracer (e.g. phyloplakton in oceanicmodels) • Conservation of luminance • In any case a complexification of the models if images are takenintoaccount.

  13. Variationalapproach for Data Assimilation.

  14. Observation Operator

  15. Optimality System: using adjoint variable

  16. Two basic approaches for assimilating images. • Pseudo Observations Methods. • From images velocities are extracted, thenused as regular observations. • Direct Assimilation of Images. • An extra termisadded in the costfunctionevaluating the discrepancybetween the pseudo-imagesissuedfrom the numerical model and the oberved image, then the usualtools of VDA are used

  17. Using Image model

  18. Image Model Approach (1) • The temporal coherency of a sequence of image isobtained by a law of conservation of brightness • If the gradient of brightness and the velocity are orthogonal then no information isadded (if an image isuniformthenitcan’tprovide information on velocity) • How to isolate structures suchthatthisequationisrepresentative of the flow?

  19. Image Model Approach (2) • Recovering U from I is a illposedproblem • Introducing a problem of optimization

  20. Zoology of Regularization

  21. MultiscaleApproach • The minimization of the costfunctionisperformed in nestedsubspaces of admissible deplacementsfieldsatscale q. It containspiecewise affine vectorfieldswith respect to eachspace variables on a square of size qxq pixels. • In practice with 2 successive time steps

  22. Example : Shallow-Waterequation

  23. Object Tracking

  24. Experimental Data (Coriolis Rotating Platform)

  25. Extended Image Model

  26. Extended Model Image • Model Image methods do no takeintoaccount the physicalproperties of the fieldsissuedfromfluidmechanics. • The retrievedfieldcanbecoherent but with few physicalsense. • The ideais to add to the optimizationproblem a physicalconstraintissuedfrom the equationgoverning the fields.

  27. Example : Shallow Water model + Thermodynamics.

  28. OptimizationProblem

  29. Comparison of IM and EIM (SST)

  30. Comparison of IM and EIM (Velocity)

  31. TwinExperiments : Images ( 1 hourbetween 2 images

  32. Initial Condition for the optimization

  33. RetrievedfieldsafterOptimization

  34. Direct Assimilation of Images : principle

  35. Direct Assimilation of Images : CostFunction

More Related