1 / 24

Allyson Macdonald Kristján Ketill Stefánsson Iceland University of Education

Expectations of and expertise in school advisory and development services in a school district in Iceland. Allyson Macdonald Kristján Ketill Stefánsson Iceland University of Education Paper presented at SERA 2006, Perth, Scotland 23rd-25th November 2006. The presentation. The evaluation

werner
Download Presentation

Allyson Macdonald Kristján Ketill Stefánsson Iceland University of Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Expectations of and expertise in school advisory and development services in a school district in Iceland Allyson Macdonald Kristján Ketill Stefánsson Iceland University of Education Paper presented at SERA 2006, Perth, Scotland 23rd-25th November 2006

  2. The presentation • The evaluation • the context • purpose of the evaluation • methodology • some results/themes in the data • new questions • Approaches to advisory services • constraints and contributors – teacher leaders • perceptions of teacher learning – district leaders • school development professionals - standards • interagency learning • A model for further development

  3. The study • Peri-urban community, rapid growth • Population about 8000 • Four preschools (480 learners, aged 2-5) • over 90% of children aged 4-5 at least 8 hours a day • Two compulsory schools (1350 learners) • 113 teachers • Light industry and services • Holistic school policy developed over two years and adopted in 2002 • Evaluation of the LEA office

  4. Functions of the LEA • Local education authority • Counties responsible for school provision • Has developed a county policy (2000-2002) which is however not legally binding for individual schools • Schools required to carry out self-evaluation • Provision of specialist services • Psychologists, speech and language problems • Support for school development – advisory services • Curriculum support, school subject advisory services • Inservice education – directly and indirectly; schools also have their own money • Development projects – directly and indirectly; assistance with applications to national funds • Five full-time staff (two school-psychologists)

  5. Purpose of the evaluation • To evaluate the activities of the LEA office • according to legal requirements and local policy • in terms of work distribution and human resources • mapping the overlap between administrative tasks and specialist and advisory services • To assess the views of school principals and special education teachers on the services and activities of the LEA office

  6. Data collection • Participants • LEA staff, school principals, special needs teachers • Preschools (aged 2-5), compulsory schools (aged 6-15) • Mixed methods • Qualitative • face-to-face interviews with staff, transcribed • e-mail interviews, analysed with NVivo software • Quantitative • custom-designed web-based questionnaire (SPSS) • From documents, including annual reports, figures from them and work descriptions • Electronic approach at all stages • Data collection from December to March • Feedback meetings from April to June • Prototype for evaluation of other LEA offices

  7. Some results

  8. Political and professional themes • The growing independence of schools, encouraged by LEA policy, is reflected in attitudes and activities • Financial management more centralised than principals would like it to be • Increased specialised knowledge in schools • Demands for quality assurance and accountability • Curricular changes • Increased emphasis on meeting individual needs • Changes in secondary (post-compulsory) education affect the compulsory curriculum

  9. Social and economic themes • Changes in the employment sector creating new expectations among parents • Increased demand for all-day places in preschools and after-school services in the lower yearclasses and a wider and coherent variety of activities for older children • Changes in society and in the community • School/social inclusion • Demands from parents for quality services • Direct access to schools and the LEA (e-mail) and demand for actions • The knowledge society and views on education

  10. Special needs support Useful 5,0 Sufficient 4,0 Teaching advice Psychological services 3,0 2,0 1,0 Speech development Services of a lay minister Prevention measures Counselling Psychology services

  11. Follow-up of individual cases LEA office 5,0 Schools 4,0 Depression Bullying 3,0 2,0 Child neglect 1,0 Well-being of the student Parent education Prevention activities Exam stress

  12. General advice LEA office 5,0 Schools 4,0 Reading difficulties Mathematics difficulties 3,0 2,0 1,0 Subject-based advice Individualized learning/development General education

  13. A way forward?

  14. From the literature • Becoming a leader in schools • Lewthwaite (2006) • How do district leaders promote teacher learning and instructional innovation? • Spillane (2000) • Can we relate monitoring-challenge-intervention to the work of individual LEA specialists, to the LEA as a whole and to specialists in schools? • National Standards for School Improvement Professionals (2003) • Can we learn from the notion of interagency learning to the need for specialist/advisory services? • Warmington et al. (2005)

  15. Becoming a teacher leader • Constraints and contributors • professional trajectory • risk and protective factors • attributes and processes, also time-dependent • intrinsic and extrinsic factors • personal attributes, microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem • interplay between systems • Development is a joint function of the person and the environment • Personal dispositions of commitment and interest • Proximal conditions – collegial and professional support and expectations within the microsystem • Key concepts: individual, systems, development Lewthwaite (2006)

  16. District leaders’ perceptions of teacher learning • New/reform policies, changes in content and pedagogy, leaders as change agents, learning theories • Study of 40 teacher leaders in nine school districts, part of a larger study on reform • 34 leaders (85%) – quasi-behaviorist approach – outside expertise, transmission, control of funds, teaching practice not addressed • five leaders (12,5%) - situated approach – teachers play an active role in their own learning, work with teachers’ identities • one leader (2,5%) – quasi-cognitive approach – individual rather social or group process, reconstruction of own knowledge • Individual agency and social structure • Structural arrangements constrain transformation of thinking • Trust – teachers hide deficiencies from leaders • Motivation for teacher learning and change - cynicism • Work of teacher leaders fragmented – wide variety of responsibilities and may compete with each other • Key concepts – structures, trust, learning Spillane (2000)

  17. National Standards for School Improvement Professionals • Standards • – reflect an approach to working with schools and teachers • – also reflect economic constraints • Key concepts – information, reflection, action, management, expertise Department for Education and Skills 02/2003DIES/0130/2003. http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/la/pdf/NSSIPS-Final.pdf?version=1

  18. Interagency/professional learning I • Developmental work research (DWR) – joined-up learning • DWR based on third generation activity theory (AT) which focuses on interacting activity systems • Expansive learning • Bateson (1972) – three levels of learning – conditioning, acquisition, questioning • Co-configuration • Victor and Boynton (1998) – distributed expertise • Five AT principles (key concepts) • system is the unit of analysis, multi-voicedness of systems, historicity, central role of contradictions/tensions within systems • possibility of expansive transformation(reconceptualisation of object and motive) TLRP LIW project (see for example Warmington et al., 2005)

  19. Interagency/professional learning II • Boundary-crossing • Engestrom – expertise developed with professionals collaborate horizontally (cf. vertical model of professional development) – transferring and creation of knowledge – horizontal learning • Boundary zones • Used in practitioner workshops in which the negotiation of new professional (support and advisory) services can emerge – ‘free from prearranged routines and patterns’ • Literature review • Tensions between strategic and operational practice and ambivalent attitues to distributed expertise • Intervention • Short-term, analysing services, redefining the object, looking at tools, rules and division of labour TLRP LIW project (see for example Warmington et al., 2005)

  20. CHALLENGING Setting standards/ benchmarks Accountability and taking responsibility Working with underperformers INTERVENTION Professional leadership Preparation of needed interventions Keeping up with official policy Taking the initiative in self-evaluation MONITORING Using information and data about performance Evaluating effects CHALLENGING Setting standards/ benchmarks Accountability and taking responsibility Working with underperformers SCHOOL MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL SPECIALIST/ ESSENTIAL SERVICES ADVISORY SERVICES SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT School management School development

  21. MONITORING Using information and data about performand Evaluating effects CHALLENGING Setting standards/ benchmarks Accountability and taking responsibility Working with underperformers DWR and joined-up learning SCHOOL MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST/ ESSENTIAL SERVICES Schools LEA

  22. CHALLENGING Setting standards/ benchmarks Accountability and taking responsibility Working with underperformers INTERVENTION Professional leadership Preparation of needed interventions Keeping up with official policy Taking the initiative in self-evaluation DWR and joined-up learning ADVISORY SERVICES SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT Schools LEA

  23. A way forward...... • Clarify the issues – expectations and expertise • Learn from the research literature • individual, systems, development • structures, trust, learning • information, reflection, action • management, expertise • multi-voicedness of systems, historicity • contradictions/tensions within systems • developmental work research (DWR) – joined-up learning • Set up structures for professional learning • about specialist/essential services • about advisory/developmental services

More Related