1 / 22

Effects of Bisphenol A on Cancer Cell Proliferation

Effects of Bisphenol A on Cancer Cell Proliferation. Anthony DiBello Central Catholic High School Grade 11. Cancer Overview. Cancer cells grow and divide at an unregulated pace (also known as proliferation ).

wcarolyn
Download Presentation

Effects of Bisphenol A on Cancer Cell Proliferation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Effects of Bisphenol A on Cancer Cell Proliferation Anthony DiBello Central Catholic High School Grade 11

  2. Cancer Overview • Cancer cells grow and divide at an unregulated pace (also known as proliferation). • Apoptosis (programmed cell death) does not occur in cancer cells. Extended passing on of this mutation eventually causes tumors to form. • Tumors can be metastatic (invasive of other body tissues) or benign(relatively harmless).

  3. MG 63 Cell Line • Human cancer cell line • Osteosarcoma cells (aggressive form of bone cancer) • Useful model for testing the effects of variables on the proliferation of cancer cells

  4. Bisphenol A • Originally produced as a synthetic estrogen • Endocrine-Disrupting Chemical used in the production of: • Polycarbonate plastic (beverage bottles, infant feeding bottles, food containers) • Epoxy resins (protective lining for canned food)

  5. Bisphenol A and Cancer • As a xenoestrogen, BPA may contain chemical factors that either cause cancer, promote cancerous growth, inhibit cancer growth, or alter the progression/phenotype of cancer. • Some cancers are promoted by the work of xenohormones (including xenoestrogens). • Mimic the actions of a certain hormone (estrogen) • Might promote cancer growth

  6. Purpose • To determine the effect of BPA exposure on cancer cell proliferation

  7. Hypotheses • Null: BPA exposure WILL NOTsignificantly affect cancer cell proliferation • Alternative: BPA exposure WILLsignificantly affect cancer cell proliferation

  8. Materials • 75 ml culture flask • Incubator • Nikon Inverted Microscope • Laminar Flow Hood • Laminar Flow Hood UV Sterilizing Lamp • Labeling Tape • Hemocytometer • Sterile PBS
 • Ethanol (70% and 100%) • Purple Nitrile gloves • Trypsin-EDTA • Pen/strep • Cryotank • Three 75 cm2 tissue culture treated flasks • Twelve 25 cm2tissue culture treated flasks 
 • Fetal bovine serum (FBS) 
 • MG63 Osteosarcoma Cancer Cell Line • Macropipette + sterile macropipette tips (1 mL, 5 mL, 10, mL, 20 mL) 
 • Micropipettes + sterile tips 
 • DMEM Serum - 1% and Complete Media (4 mM L-glutamine, 4500 mg/L glucose, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 1500 mg/L sodium bicarbonate + [ 10% fetal bovine serum for complete]) • 10 mg Bisphenol A

  9. Procedure: Cell Culture • MG 63 cells were thawed and grown for four days. • When flasks reached a density of approximately 1 million cells/mL, the cells were passed into two flasks and incubated for 2 days at 37° C, 5% CO2.

  10. Procedure: Proliferation Experiment – Day 0 (Addition of Variable) • Cells were trypsinized and suspended in 20 mL of media, creating a density of approximately 1x10^5 cells per flask • 0.5 ml of the cell suspension was added to 25 cm2 tissue culture treated flasks containing 4.5 mL of DMEM (com) media. • Two stock solutions of BPA were created using pure ethanol and DMEM media: 10^-4 M and 10^-5 M. • Experimental flasks were exposed to Bisphenol A and all flasks were incubated. (2 flasks per concentration x 3 concentrations x 2 days = 12 flasks total) • The cells were incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 for the remainder of the study.

  11. Concentration Chart

  12. Procedure: Cell Density • Day 1 and Day 2 ▫ For each flask, cell densities were determined asfollows: • The cells were trypsinized and collected into cell suspension. • 10 μl aliquots were transferred to a Hemocytometer for quantification (eight counts per flask).

  13. Dunnett’s Test Results

  14. Images: Day 1 0 M Low (10^-6 M) High (10^-5 M)

  15. Images: Day 2 0 M 10^-6 M 10^-5 M

  16. Conclusions • The effect of BPA exposure on cancer cell proliferation was significantfor both concentrations on day two only. • Null hypothesis rejected.

  17. Future Changes • It is unlikely that all cell suspensions were perfectly homogenous. • Pipetting at various stages of experimentation was not perfectly synchronized. • BPA needed to be dissolved in pure ethanol, potentially harming cell growth. • Different exposures of BPA can be used (longer exposures and greater concentrations) • Test BPA exposure on other cell lines (C2C12, 3T3) • Use an Ames test to determine mutagenic capabilities of BPA on a non-cancer cell model. Limitations Extensions

  18. References • Mark Krotec, PTEI • Phil Campbell, Ph.D. • Donald B. DeFranco, Ph.D. • https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2967230/#!po=81.6667 • http://www.northcarolinahealthnews.org/2012/04/02/local-scientists-in-the-middle-of-the-bpa-debate/ • https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/just-how-harmful-are-bisphenol-a-plastics/

  19. ANOVA Analysis: Day 1

  20. ANOVA Analysis: Day 2

More Related