is ip going to take over the world of communications n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Is IP going to take over the world (of communications)? PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Is IP going to take over the world (of communications)?

Is IP going to take over the world (of communications)?

296 Views Download Presentation
Download Presentation

Is IP going to take over the world (of communications)?

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript

  1. Is IP going to take over the world (of communications)? Pablo Molinero-Fernandez Stanford University Nick McKeown Stanford University Hui Zhang Turin Networks, Carnegie Mellon University Text from Alan Mislove, Ansley Post

  2. Background • The Internet is one of the most successful communications platforms because of two characteristics • Reachability • Heterogeneity • Almost all Internet traffic is over Internet Protocol (IP) • First created in 1970, called Mark I

  3. Background (cont) • Internet’s success has lead to the assumption that it will become the only communication platform • Phone Networks would be replaced with voice-over-IP systems; • Skype (100 million users in just 3 years) • Vonage (100k users in just 3 years), • Movies and Television will be distributed using Internet • YouTube, VideoFurnace, Google Videos • Similarly, it has also lead to the assumption that packet-switching (IP) routers will become the only switching device.

  4. Motivation • Despite its strengths, IP is not necessarily the best solution • Goal of our paper: • Counter the assumption that IP will “take over the world (of communications)” • Comparing packet switching to other switching devices • Shatter false assumptions that lead to this belief

  5. IP Misbeliefs • Widely held assumptions that will be questioned • Current dominance of IP over other communications • IP’s efficiency • IP’s robustness • IP’s simplicity • Real-time applications using IP

  6. Dominance of IP • It is falsely believed that IP currently dominates global communication • ISP’s have revenues of $13B • Compared to other communications’ revenues totaling $344B • Internet only reaches 59% of US • phone 94% & TV 98% • IP market is smaller in the data & telephony infrastructure • IP routers market size: $4.1B • circuit-based router market size: $32.5B

  7. Efficiency of IP • IP makes efficient use of “scarce” bandwidth • But is it really scarce? • Average Internet link utilization is 3%-20% • Ethernet networks utilization is much lower at ~1% • Long-distance phone line utilization is 33% • Network’s over provision allows for a low packet delay

  8. Efficiency of IP (cont) • Why? (Over Provision) • Internet traffic is asymmetric and bursty • Difficult to predict traffic growth on a link • Economical to add large increments of capacity • However, there are “less talked-about” reasons • Under congestion, IP performs badly • Control traffic transmitted in-band • Results in black holes, traffic loops, etc… • Much easier to keep utilization low

  9. Efficiency of IP (cont) • In practice, user experiences the same delay in packet-switched or circuit-switched network • Average user’s work (65%) is request-response • File sharing • For most types of workloads, circuit-switching provides same user response time

  10. Robustness of IP • Internet was designed to withstand catastrophic event. • Median Internet downtime is 471 minutes/year • Median phone downtime is 5 minutes/year • BGP convergence is slow (3-15 minutes) • SONET/SDH switches to a backup path in 50ms • Nothing inherently unreliable about circuit-switching

  11. Simplicity of IP • Beginning principle is that complexity should be at the endpoints • Increasingly, IP routers have become sophisticated • Multicast • Quality of Service • VPN • Configuring IP routers can be very difficult • Single misconfigured IP router can cause instability for a large portion of the network

  12. Simplicity of IP (cont.) • IP routers have about 8 million • Circuit-switched routers have 3 million lines of code • IP routers have 300 million gates, 1 CPU, 300 MB of buffer space • Circuit routers have 25% of the gates and no CPU • Circuit-switched routers sell for 9% - 50% the price • IP routers do not lend themselves to implementing optics • Circuit switching is compatible with optical technology

  13. Real-Time Support in IP • Widely held assumption that IP will support real-time applications • This assumption relies on over provisioning of the network • Or Quality-of-service in the network that has yet to be implemented • Even after 10 years of research, no infrastructure has been created (using IP routers) to replace circuit switching.

  14. What if we started over? • Hybrid solution would be most appropriate • Uses packet switching at the edges • Circuit-switching at the core and with applications with QoS demands • Tightly integrate these two parts

  15. Conclusion • IP does some things well, but not everything • Good for scarce-bandwidth situations • Wireless, undersea cables, satellite links • Inappropriate for real-time applications • Voice traffic, telephony • If we redesigned the Internet, not all routers would be packet-switching • Core routers and real-time application data would be circuit-switched

  16. Questions? • Mike O’Dell, former Senior VP, UUNet: • “[to have a voice-over-IP network service one has to] create the most expensive data service to run an application for which people are willing to pay less money everyday, […] and for which telephony already provides a better solution with a marginal cost of almost zero”