By Mo 22/ nov /12

1. Hadron Collider. By Mo 22/nov/12

2. Hadron collider. The Large Hadron Collider, is the world's largest and highest energy particle accelerator. It is expected to address the most fundamental questions of physics, advancing our understanding of the deepest laws of nature. It will make use understand the past, present and future. Was made at 1998 but only published to the world at 2008 because of occurring problems with the manufacturing of the Hadron.

3. 1)Public problems. The public had a problem with the Hadron Collider, they believed that if the scientist was able to make a black hole then the earth would be sucked in at 2 meter per hour.

4. Article.

5. Black hole. • The title of the article is called ‘Large Hadron Collider runs into more problems’. • This article discusses about the Black Hole, it talks gradually about how the Black Hole could have sucked the world in and could have affected the world in a non - positive way. • This article briefly discusses the Black Hole, by acknowledging the theories of the Black Hole causing a problem. The article discusses in scientific terms, what they are trying to invent. But even though they are discussing what the Hadron Collider does, they still mention the possibility of the Black Hole occurring and sucking the world into it slowly. • This case discusses how the Black Hole experiments was a failure due to a problem, then discusses how people and other scientists gathered theories.

6. Justified. • The public was concerned of the Black Hole affecting Earth, because of the articles discussing theories from scientists that work with the article company. But this case can’t be justified, because the experiment never occurred and there was no information of it leading to a destructive Black Hole. • The people that have made this theory are in fact scientists, but they over exaggerate what could happen, just to bring in readers for their article. • In fact there is no reason for why the public should have concerns, because all of these theories where from over exaggerated points, that the scientists made to bring in the readers.

7. 2)Religious problems. • Most religions are against the • Hadron Collider, the reason why is because it can disprove their belief o of God, so this brings fear to most of the religious nations. The reason why it can affect religion, is because if the Hadron Collider was successful in proving the Big Bang or revolution itself, then this could disprove religion. The Hadron Collider strikes fear to religious communities, because if their experiment was successful, they could end up disproving God.

8. Article.

9. Article

10. Religion VS LHC • The title of the article is ‘LHC and Religious Controversy’. • ‘While many people are excited by the scientific possibilities now offered by Large Hadron Collider, not everyone in the international community is thrilled by this piece of technological’ • This article discusses how religion cannot work with the Hadron collider, this article is not against the LHC nor is it along side with it, but just an article discussing how a community of people feel around this technology that might disprove religion. • The good thing about this article is that it gives full view about everyone’s opinions. It speaks to the religious people about how they feel about the Hadron Collider, and speaks to the people that work alongside the Hadron Collider of why they believe religion is against this invention.

11. Justified • Because this experiment has not happened yet, and there has been no information leading to the Hadron Collider proving Big Bang, then there is no reason that the public should be worried. • Just because the Big Bang does get proven, does not mean that God does not exist. • The people that work alongside the Hadron Collider, have explained that they would not use the Hadron Collider to find the existence of God, but to find out more information about the Big Bang. • The Hadron’s job is to make us understand the past and could prove big bang theory, but I call it fear because the Hadron could disprove god, but other people might call it an insult to them that the people that work alongside want to disprove god. • The Hadron’s job was never to disprove but just to understand the past, and maybe it could prove that god exists and maybe it could prove big bang but doesn’t mean there is no god. • The Hadron does admit to be made to look at the past, so the religions are worried that they use this to disprove god.

12. 3)If it is successful would it affect us. • There is a theory discussing how if time travel was successful - as proven by the Hadron Collider, because they made an atom travel back in time by two seconds - that time travel needs rules or it could effect the world. What I mean, is if someone was to time travel in the past and to have disturbed the past, they could cause a problem to Earth in our time. • The people that work alongside The Hadron Collider, could effect what is needed to be done to make earth how it is now. Not only this, but also could end up effecting the world, and may cause many more problems. • An example is, if someone wanted to learn more about dinosaurs, they would travel back in time to study them, but accidently could end up opening a portal, where the dinosaurs can come in to Earth now, in this time.

13. Article

14. Back to the future. • This article discusses about how time travel could affect Earth, this article is comical, but serious at the same time. • This article says that you cannot interrupt time travel, because you can end up affecting the past, which could affect the modern time. • This article might not be written by a scientist, but still gathers enough information, that the public would find concerning. • It brings in the public, by discussing questions, that are relevant to them and the public. • Just because this technology has not been made, does not mean that it can not cause problems. This article is trying to promote, that if the Hadron Collider is successful, then they would need rules settled before hand, so that they do not interrupt time.

15. Justified. • Because this invention has not been created yet and there has been no mention of this technology being made, there is no way to prove that time travel could affect time. • The time travel could end up helping us, understand how we got to modern society and how Earth got to where it is now. • There should be rules, just in case the worst, but as there has been no sign of the Hadron Collider, trying to make time travel, there is no need for the public to be concerned about time travelling problems. • If the Hadron Collider does decide to make time travel, then they would have been smart enough to have made rules for time travel. • There has been no ideas of making a time traveling Hadron collider so there is no reason why this article should be in publics concern.

16. 4) Explosion the public are worried if earth it self would explode, now it might drastic but the Hadron Collider is 17 miles long and the most powerful science invention there is, the best scientist are working on the Hadron Collider, and it has been invested $5 billion, so this means this would have the most energy and power on earth, and if a slight problem occurs then, this powerful problem could cause an explosion.

17. Article.

18. Article.

19. Daily Mail. • They named the title ‘are we are all going to die next Wednesday?’ • They wrote that ‘earthquakes would start unexpectedly. After a few days, disturbances would reach catastrophic proportions’. • This article scares people, making people carry on reading more, this might be good for the Daily Mail, but does not give the Hadron Collider a good reputation. • This article slowly describes how the Earth could be destroyed. It describes how earthquakes and hurricanes could happen, if there was a problem with the technology. • Not explosion per say, but the Earth being destroyed slowly, this article discusses that, because the machinery involved to make the Hadron Collider is so powerful, if there was a slight problem, then this could cause Earth disruptions and may cause Earth to explode.

20. Justified. • The people that work at the Hadron Collider, will make sure that their experiment would be proceeded safely, the scientist that work at the Hadron Collider are trying to find out answers about the world, but have no intention to causing destruction to Earth. • This matter will not be justified, because both have fair arguments. • The people that work at the Hadron Collider would say that they preserve life and make sure there is safety to mankind and Earth. They would say that they would still be composing experiments, but in a safe procedure. • But the article, would argue that because the Hadron Collider is the most powerful equipment with the most energy used to operate it, even the slightest problem could make cause a catastrophic effect to Earth and mankind.

21. reference • http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1052354/Are-going-die-Wednesday.html • http://www.atomic.com.com/News/136892,large-hadron-collider-runs-into-more-problems.aspx • http://brutaldesign.com/covers (image) • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider (information of Hadron) • http://lateral.netmanagers.com.ar/weblog/posts/BB846.html • http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/06/nuclear-bombs-congress-elections-campaign-donations • http://io9.com/5277702/could-our-nuclear-arsenal-really-destroy-the-world