1 / 54

WA HIV-STIC Kick-off February, 2012 Elizabeth Strauss, NIATx PI Coach

WA HIV-STIC Kick-off February, 2012 Elizabeth Strauss, NIATx PI Coach. Reduce Waiting & No-Shows  Increase Admissions & Continuation. The Change Process. Current State. Desired Future. 1. Your Name/Organization/Role. 2. If the bike represents your organization’s current

verena
Download Presentation

WA HIV-STIC Kick-off February, 2012 Elizabeth Strauss, NIATx PI Coach

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. WA HIV-STIC Kick-off February, 2012 Elizabeth Strauss, NIATx PI Coach Reduce Waiting & No-Shows  Increase Admissions & Continuation

  2. The Change Process Current State Desired Future 1. Your Name/Organization/Role 2. If the bike represents your organization’s current “change process”, what part of the bike are you?

  3. AGENDA • Implementing SHIELD for HIV Prevention • Introduction to Process Improvement • Experience Rapid Cycle Testing • How can the NIATx Way help with the implementation of SHIELD? • NIATx Tools: • Nominal Group Process • Aim Measures and Cycle Measures • Change Project Form • Flowcharting • What’s next? • Closing

  4. TheNetwork for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment (NIATx) • Started in 2003 with 13 substance abuse treatment provider organizations, funded by RWJF and SAMHSA/CSAT • Today, nearly 1000 payers and providers participating in initiatives in 50 states

  5. Reduce Waiting Times:23.6% reduction (82 change projects in 34 agencies) Reduce No-Shows: 32% reduction (51 change projects in 29 agencies) Increase Admissions: 25.3% increase (52 change projects in 25 agencies) Increase Continuation: 13.5% increase (102 change projects in 34 agencies) NIATx Provider Results (As of November 2006)

  6. SAMSHA Targeted Capacity Expansion/HIV Program AIM: • Increase admissions, HIV testing, follow-up/continuation in HIV programs. (17 sites) RESULTS: • Increase from 30% to 90% of clients attending next 4 sessions after intake (LA, CA). • Increase from 10% to 80% of clients agreeing to HIV testing (Newark, NJ). • Increase from 44% to 100% of clients completing intake/assessment (Detroit, MI).

  7. Denver Public Health Infectious Disease Clinic Referral Process • Increased the number of HIV+ patients referred to OP Behavioral Health Services from 1/month to 1-2/week

  8. Denver Public Health Infectious Disease Clinic Referral Process • CHANGES: • Offered weekly groups for HIV+ patients, publicizing with flyers, posters, and tickets at the ID Clinic and Primary Care Clinic. • Did outreach to individuals. • Scheduled appointments rather than having walk-ins. • Social Workers from the ID Clinic held monthly meetings with ID Clinic, PCC, and OBHS staff to provide education about services available for HIV+ patients.

  9. TheNetwork for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment (NIATx) • Applied the access and retention aims to Corrections • Used the NIATx Way for Prevention • Implemented Evidence-Based Practices using the NIATx model

  10. HIV Services and Treatment Implementation in Corrections(HIV-STIC) • NEW - Apply the NIATx Way to: • HIV Services in Corrections • HIV Prevention • Implementing an Evidence Based Practice -- SHIELD

  11. Conduct implementation research on how to more effectively implement and sustain improvements in the HIV Services Continuum for offenders under correctional supervision Evaluate relative effectiveness of a local change team process improvement approach for improving HIV service implementation in criminal justice settings Overall Research Goals

  12. Study Design Randomized design (matched pairs of facilities) will compare HIV implementation and service outcomes in facilities using a local change team/process improvement approach to control sites receiving baseline training only 4 facilities/sites per Research Center; 36 facilities total Each agency (through Executive Sponsor) selects an area of HIV services continuum and instructs facilities to improve these services Control sites receive training and access to resources, and staff is charged with improving HIV services Experimental sites receive same training and resources as Controls PLUS local change team process improvement approach with a Coach

  13. Customers are served by processes 85% of customer related problems arecaused by organizational processes To better serve customers, organizations must improveprocesses Why Process Improvement?

  14. An experiment in change… using a structured process, guided by the customer, driven by data Based on the Model For Improvement in The Improvement Guide, by Langley, Nolan, Nolan, Norman, & Provost What is Process Improvement?

  15. Five Key Principles Evidence-based predictors of change Gustafson and Hundt, 1995 • Understand & Involve the Customer • Focus on Key Problems • Appoint an Influential Change Leader • Seek Ideas from Outside the Organization • Do Rapid-Cycle Testing (PDSA cycles)

  16. Most important of the Five Principles 1. Understand and Involve the Customer

  17. What is it like to be our customer (inmate, patient, client, peer educator)? Do a walk-through Flowchart the process Hold focus groups Ask the customer 1. Understand and Involve the Customer

  18. Walk-through Complete a walk-through of the area you are trying to improve • Select 2 people to play the roles of inmate and friend. • Let staff know in advance. • Act as if you were a typical inmate. • Observe and record your experiences and feelings. • What barriers, discomfort, information gaps, positive experiences are there? • Ask staff what changes would make their job easier or make it better for inmates. • Make a list of the areas that need improvement and specific changes you would want to make.

  19. 2.Focus on Key Problems What keeps the Executive Sponsor awake at night? What processes have staff and customers identified as barriers to prevention education?

  20. 3. Appoint an Influential Change Leader Who has: Influence, respect and authority across levels of the organization A direct line to the Executive Sponsor Empathy for staff and customers Time available to lead change projects No fear of data Enthusiasm

  21. 4. Seek Ideas from Outside the Organization To provide new ways of looking at the problem What can be learned from other organizations and businesses?

  22. 5. Do Rapid-Cycle Testing • Rapid-Cycle changes • Are quick, small, • do-able in 2 weeks • PDSA cycles • Plan the change • Do the plan • Study the results • Act on the new knowledge (adapt, adopt or abandon) Act Plan Study Do

  23. The role of data (and graphs) in decision-making Chg 2 Chg 1 Chg 3 Month

  24. Model for Improvement 1. What are we trying to accomplish? (AIM) 2. How will we know that a change is an improvement? (MEASURE) 3. What CHANGES can we make that will result in an improvement? Reference: Langley, Nolan, Nolan, Norman, & Provost. The Improvement Guide Act Plan Study Do 4. How can we sustain the improvements?

  25. The customer is involved Change is a big experiment No mistakes, no right or wrong Data tells you if the change was an improvement What makes this approach to change different?

  26. The Executive Sponsor articulates the vision and removes barriers to change. The Change Leaderprovides day-to-day leadership with energy and enthusiasmto motivate and empower the Change Team. The Change Team plans and implements change cycles. Who’s Who in Process Improvement?

  27. The Change Leader • Facilitates change team meetings • Supervises changes and helps team with implementation issues • Is empowered to overcome barriers to implementation of change experiments • Supervises measurement, compilation and interpretation of data • Keeps executive sponsor aware of change team activities

  28. The Change Team • A small group of 5-7 people designated by the Executive Sponsor to work on a specific area for improvement (i.e. a change project focused on 1 aim)

  29. The Change Team • Plans and implements change cycles • Identifies possible changes that could improve the aim • Decides how to implement the change • Creates and conducts rapid cycle pilot tests until the goal is achieved • Collects data • Studies results to see if the change should be adopted, adapted or abandoned

  30. What Change Teams Say • Rapid cycle testing has given us the opportunity to see that even small changes can have a large impact. • Analyze your data - it can tell you what the problem is - it’s continuous - Turn to Data to Indicate Need for Change & Problem Solving. • Successful collaboration leads to better client outcomes.

  31. What Change Teams Say • In addition to favorable results directly related to the change, we had an unintended positive side effect: Increased client return rate… from 76% to 85%, saving counselor time. • Taking time to study the results and process how each member of the team felt about results helped to support decisions. • “The walk-through opens your eyes to what a client goes through—invaluable.” • Used “WALK THROUGH” for other processes.

  32. Experience small scale, rapid PDSA cyclesThe Ball Pass Exercise

  33. Model for Improvement 1. What are we trying to accomplish? (AIM) 2. How will we know that a change is an improvement? (MEASURE) 3. What CHANGES can we make that will result in an improvement? Reference: Langley, Nolan, Nolan, Norman, & Provost. The Improvement Guide Act Plan Study Do

  34. The Ball Pass Exercise • AIM: to pass the ball from person to person as quickly as possible. • RULES: • Only one person may touch the ball at a time; each person must touch the ball with both hands. • The ball must be passed to a person who is not right next to you. • The cycle begins when the Change Leader passes the ball the first time and ends when the Change Leader has the ball at the end.

  35. The Ball Pass Exercise • Select a: • Change Leader • Data Recorder • Cycle #1 (baseline): • Stand in a circle. • The Change Leader passes the ball to another person in the circle who is not next to them. • Each person passes the ball to another person who is not right next to them; when everyone has touched the ball, pass it back to the Change Leader. • The data recorder documents the time from the beginning to the end of the cycle (baseline data).

  36. The Ball Pass Exercise • Conduct at least 3 PDSA cycles • PLAN: What can we do to reduce the time required? • DO: Implement the change and measure how long it takes. • STUDY: Did we get the results we expected? Was the change implemented as planned? • ACT: Adopt, adapt or abandon this change idea and decide what the next cycle will be. • Repeat another PDSA cycle.

  37. The Ball Pass Exercise • Tell your story: Create a graph to show the data for each PDSA cycle, noting the change that was made for each cycle.

  38. The Ball Pass Exercise Discussion Questions: • How did you decide on a change? • Were you able to implement one change at a time? • Did you decrease the amount of time required? • Why is it important to collect baseline data? • What changes were most effective?

  39. How can the NIATx Way help with the implementation of SHIELD?

  40. How can the NIATx Way help with the implementation of SHIELD? • Recruitment • Intervention sessions • Participant retention • Maintenance/Sustaining SHIELD

  41. Model for Improvement 1. What are we trying to accomplish? (AIM) 2. How will we know that a change is an improvement? (MEASURE) 3. What CHANGES can we make that will result in an improvement? Reference: Langley, Nolan, Nolan, Norman, & Provost. The Improvement Guide Act Plan Study Do

  42. STEP 1: Preparation (clarify objective, prepare question, prepare meeting room) STEP 2: Silent idea generation STEP 3: Round-robin recording of ideas STEP 4: Serial discussion of ideas STEP 5: Preliminary voting STEP 6: Discussion of preliminary voting STEP 7: Final voting Nominal Group Process to brainstorm change ideas and assign priorities

  43. Encourage creative thinking!

  44. STEP 1: Preparation STEP 2: Silent idea generation STEP 3: Round-robin recording of ideas STEP 4: Serial discussion of ideas STEP 5: Preliminary voting STEP 6: Discussion of preliminary voting STEP 7: Final voting Nominal Group Process to brainstorm change ideas and assign priorities

  45. Model for Improvement 1. What are we trying to accomplish? (AIM) 2. How will we know that a change is an improvement? (MEASURE) 3. What CHANGES can we make that will result in an improvement? Reference: Langley, Nolan, Nolan, Norman, & Provost. The Improvement Guide Act Plan Study Do

  46. SHIELD AIM Measures SHIELD Pre-Post Assessment Form (Appendix 8) will measure: Communication Behaviors Knowledge Peer educator self-efficacy Social network

  47. Aim Measures vs. Cycle Measures How will you know if a change is an improvement? Recruitment Participant retention

  48. The Change Project Form Complete page 1, the Project Charter How to begin

  49. Flowcharting Flowcharts force an organizational focus on process.

  50. Flowcharting is useful for: Providing a starting point/baseline view Understanding the process Identifying key problems/bottlenecks Showing where to test ideas for most impact Stimulating thinking - results in brilliant ideas Adding interactivity & fun - gets the team together Creating a simple & succinct visual process overview Why Flowchart?

More Related