1 / 15

SCIPC WG5 (L0)

SCIPC WG5 (L0). Breese Quinn , Ela Barberis, Bill Cooper, Eric Kajfasz, Elizaveta Shabalina, Taka Yasuda, Eckhard von Toerne. 15:30 Introduction (05')    Breese Q.  15:35 L0 Design Review (20')    Andrei N.

Download Presentation

SCIPC WG5 (L0)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SCIPC WG5 (L0) Breese Quinn, Ela Barberis, Bill Cooper, Eric Kajfasz, Elizaveta Shabalina, Taka Yasuda, Eckhard von Toerne • 15:30 Introduction (05')    Breese Q.  • 15:35 L0 Design Review (20')    Andrei N. • 15:55 Pre-Inst. Plans (Fall shutdown) (20')    Bill C. Lyn B. • 16:15 L0 Geometry MC (15')    Lisa S.  • 16:30 Review Inst. & Comm. Schedule (30') All  • 17:00 Run IIa: What went right/wrong? (30')All Agenda: Monday 17 May 2004 B. Quinn University of Mississippi

  2. L0 Design: Run IIa status • We expect Layer 1 Micron sensors to begin to fail at exposures of ~ 3-4 fb-1 • We are seeing continuing failures of readouts in the current detector (84% currently enabled) B. Quinn University of Mississippi

  3. L0 Design: Physical • Detector must fit between radii of 16mm – beam pipe flange and 22.8mm – SMT support structure openings • 6 phi segments, 8 z segments • 48 HDIs x 256 channels • Phi acceptance 98.4% B. Quinn University of Mississippi

  4. L0 Design: Expected Enhancement • Layer0 will recover b-tagging efficiencyto original values before irradiation • If “no loss” model is assumed Layer0 improves b-tagging per jet by 15% • Improvement in vertex resolution allows considerable increase of Bs mixing reach B. Quinn University of Mississippi

  5. L0 Design: Pitch Adapter Concern • Change wrt Run2B design : pitch adapter • 1st prototype failed, vendor is trying again (due in a few weeks) • 2nd vendor is being brought in to give it a try B. Quinn University of Mississippi

  6. L0 Design: Noise Control • CDF L00 had negative experience using analog cables – large noise • Concluded that source of noise are poorly grounded conductors near sensors and analog cables • We’ve done a lot of R&D trying to avoid same mistakes • Found that low inductance ground connections are very important to equalize potential between different parts • Found a solution when Carbon Fiber support structure is forced to be at ground potential providing low inductance path B. Quinn University of Mississippi

  7. L0 Design: Noise Control B. Quinn University of Mississippi

  8. L0 Design: Noise Control • L0 module • L0 modules on grounded support structure B. Quinn University of Mississippi

  9. Fall Shutdown Plans: Mechanical • H disk removal/repair • Only two H disks will remain once L0 is installed • All four H disks have many unusable wedges • H wedges will be redistributed to make two “good” H disks • Should the rebuilding of the H disks be done during this year’s fall shutdown or during next year’s upgrade? • Pro: try to get as much done work ahead of time as possible • Con: difficult job – don’t remove the H disks twice if you don’t have to • Considerations • Beam pipe risk – would have to be disconnected, not cut • Do the H disks have to be removed for clearance measurements anyway? • Likely – see next slide • Is there enough time/manpower to get it done in 13 weeks? • Lisa will ask Moscow for schedule estimate • What are the physics risks of failure? • Eckhard is pursuing this • General consensus is we want it done now if at all possible B. Quinn University of Mississippi

  10. Fall Shutdown Plans: Mechanical • Measuring beam pipe region clearances • There is some uncertainty about the reliability of the clearance numbers in hand • One extreme or the other: • “Open heart surgery”: remove the beam pipe and probably H disks for direct measurement access • This does require that the beam pipe be cut • “MRI”: may be possible to map the membrane openings with tracks • This needs to be determined soon – by whom? • There is risk involved with beam pipe work, but I believe it comes down to two things: • If the mapping doesn’t work, this will be the last time to check the aperture. If we don’t and find out next year that it’s too small, the game is over. • There are very careful and capable people to do the work. B. Quinn University of Mississippi

  11. Fall Shutdown Plans: Electrical • Install 1-4 L0 modules • Hardware installation (Bagby, Foglesong) • Sensor modules in gaps on the horseshoe • Power supplies in the cathedral • SEQC firmware installed • Software • Download GUI needs to handle SVX4 chips (Bucholz) • Install more HV for L0 • Hardware (Prague?) • Have new HV pods and fanout boxes for L0 bias voltages • Need more cabling • Software • Lots more mapping (Quinn) • Modify GUIs • Almost all of this work is in MCH2 – it can start immediately B. Quinn University of Mississippi

  12. L0 Geometry in Simulation • Implement new SMT geometry in D0gstar (D0 Geant) • Modify SMT hit storage interface (simpp) • Modify SMT hit digitization package (d0sim) • Modify SMT hit packing (into raw data chunk) (smtraw, smtutil, pack_reco) • Modify SMT cluster reconstruction packages • Modify reconstructiongeometry and track reconstruction B. Quinn University of Mississippi

  13. L0 Software Overview • Huge number of tasks – ZERO names! ? ? controls ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? B. Quinn University of Mississippi

  14. L0 Software – Physics Commissioning • Huge number of tasks – ZERO names! • Need a non-trivial number of workers • Lisa & Ela are putting together a task list/manpower estimate • Will require push from management ala calorimeter group expansion • Need a “L0 Physics Commissioning” leader (Quinn – find, not be!) • Responsible for encouraging tool development, but even more so for implementing a plan for studies using those tools to get physics quality data • Within the SMT/L0 group, parallel to Installation leaders (Bill, Lyn) • Integrated to the Algorithms/Tracking groups B. Quinn University of Mississippi

  15. SCIPC WG5 (L0) Summary • Two major areas of concern • Planning for Fall 2004 shutdown activities • Get as much done as is reasonably possible • Clearance measurements • H disk removal/repair • Cooling system studies • Photography • Many decisions to be made in the next couple of weeks • L0 Physics Commissioning • Run IIa did not provide a good model here • Enormous number of software tasks and no one is working on them • Need a person responsible for physics commissioning studies program within the group • Other • Review of existing Installation schedule taking place asynchronously offline. Will address it before Fresno • Revise Installation status • Include Commissioning schedule • SMT/L0 Integration needs to happen on a short timescale B. Quinn University of Mississippi

More Related