250 likes | 321 Views
Explore benefits of engaging students in online peer mentoring for interprofessional learning. Study the effectiveness of referral prioritization training tool for occupational therapists. Evaluate learner experience of ePortfolios in health sciences.
E N D
HEA HSP mini project study day 21 January 2009 Dr Marilyn Hammick
Programme Dr Marilyn Hammick
Questions that focus on your enquiry • Why did I want to do this project/work? • Who/What am I doing it for? • How will I know if the work has been successful? Dr Marilyn Hammick
Questions that focus on your enquiry • Why did I want to do this project/work? Dr Marilyn Hammick
Questions that focus on your enquiry • Why did I want to do this project/work? • Who/What am I doing it for? • How will I know if the work has been successful? Dr Marilyn Hammick
Phase 10 projects • Interprofessional learning: exploring the benefits of engaging students in online peer mentoring.. • Of Sound Mind and Body? A Case Study.. • Randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a referral prioritization decision training tool for student occupational therapists. • Exploring the learner experience of ePortfolios for formative and summative feedback in the health sciences. • Evaluating clinically based vodcasts on the engagement of nursing students with research. Dr Marilyn Hammick
Three purposes of enquiry Capacity Dr Marilyn Hammick
Questions that focus on your enquiry • Why did I want to do this project/work? • Who/What am I doing it for? • How will I know if the work has been successful? Dr Marilyn Hammick
Four eeee’s Ethics Dr Marilyn Hammick
Rigorous & robust Three choices positivist interpretive and illuminative change Dr Marilyn Hammick
Enquiry ‘logic loop’ proving Quality improving Impact Outcomes Effectiveness Dr Marilyn Hammick
improving Four guiding principles – that an enquiry should be: • contributory: advances wider knowledge and/or understanding; • defensible in design: provides a research strategy which can address the questions posed; • rigorous in conduct: through the systematic and transparent collection, analysis and interpretation of data; • credible in claim: offers well-founded and plausible arguments about the significance of the data generated Ref: UK HM Government Strategy Unit Dr Marilyn Hammick
Quality judgement • Contribution • Design • Conduct • Claims Dr Marilyn Hammick
Contribution • Assessment of current knowledge • Identified need for knowledge • Takes organisational context into account • Transferability assessed Dr Marilyn Hammick
Defensible design • Theoretical richness • Evaluation question (s) • Clarity of aims and purpose • Criteria for outcomes and impact • Resources • Chronology Dr Marilyn Hammick
Conducted rigorously • Ethics and governance • Clarity and logic • sampling • data collection • analysis • synthesis • judgements Dr Marilyn Hammick
Makes credible claims Dr Marilyn Hammick
Hammick M, Freeth D, Koppel I, Reeves S & Barr H (2007) A Best Evidence Systematic Review of Interprofessional Education BEME Guide No. 9 Medical Teacher29 (8): pp. 735-51. • Kirkpatrick D (1967) Evaluation of Training. In Craig R, Bittel L, editors. Training and Development Handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill. p. 131-167. Dr Marilyn Hammick
Questions • Why did I want to do this project/work? • Who/What am I doing it for? • How will I know if the work has been successful? Dr Marilyn Hammick
in other words • Importance and value • Making a difference • Foundations and springboard Dr Marilyn Hammick
Your project … • Five potential risks to the project • Mitigating against the risks Dr Marilyn Hammick
How it feels now … • In six words Dr Marilyn Hammick