1 / 26

Solar based WSN

Solar based WSN. Helimote [05] 20% duty cycle for one week Prometheus[05] Support 10 days using duty cycle from available power . Modeling of energy prediction.

varsha
Download Presentation

Solar based WSN

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Solar based WSN • Helimote[05] • 20% duty cycle for one week • Prometheus[05] • Support 10 days using duty cycle from available power

  2. Modeling of energy prediction • A. Kansal, J. Hsu, S. Zahedi, and M. B. Srivastava, “Power management in energy harvesting sensor networks,” ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst., 2007. • exponentially weighted moving-average (EWMA) • d • Past Predict Future (PPF) • N.Sharma, et al. ”Cloudy Computing: Leveraging Weather Forecast in Energy Harvesting Sensor System.” SECON’10 • Weather forecast • Linear regression • More accurate than PPF

  3. Cloudy Computing: Leveraging Weather Forecasts in Energy Harvesting Sensor Systems Navin K. Sharma, Jeremy Gummeson, David Irwin, and PrashantShenoyConference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks(SECON), 2010.

  4. Introduction • Energy harvesting system • Collectand store environmental energy • Sustain continuous operation w/o access to external power source • Often deployed in remote locations w/o power grid • Energy-neutral • Energy source produce power faster than consume • Depends on HW components or workload • energy-proportional HW and elastic workload • HW energy consumption scales linearly w/ workload intensity

  5. Challenges • unable to precisely change the intensity of inelastic workload and energy usage to match harvested energy • Inelastic workload • External requests • Internal object : fair steady node sensing rate • Highly sensitive to energy reserve and prediction

  6. Energy prediction • Weather forecast better than past to predict the future? • Analyze extensive historical weather data • Formulate forecast energy model

  7. Related work A.Kansal, et al, “Power Management in Energy Harvesting Sensor Network” Transactions on Embedded Computing System, 2007 • Past Predict the Future (PPF) • Xe(t) = αX(t) + (1- α)Xe(t-1) • Xe(t): average harvested energy of past days in the same slot • X(t): observed real energy at the same time slot • t : slot, eg. estimate per hr , t =1~24 • Strength.: accurate for sec. to min. • Weakness: unable for drastic weather changes

  8. PPF with solar observation • Sky condition shows significant inter-day and intra-day variations • accurate when time interval small (<2.4hr) • RMSE: root mean square error

  9. PPF with wind observation • Least accurate from 3hr to 1 week • Most accurate at <2min and >10days 3hr ~ 1 week

  10. Weather forecast model • Correlation forecast weather w/ local weather observations • Correlation local weather observations w/ energy harvesting by deployed panel and turbine • Predict how much energy harvesting in the future for given weather forecasts

  11. Data collection • National Weather Service (NWS) • Sky condition: cloud cover N% • wind speed • Forecast 3hr~72hr weather data per 3hr • Weather station deployed at UMASS (20 miles away) • Solar radiation(watt/m2) • Wind speed • Every 5 min • 2008~2009 • HOBO data logger • Battery voltage, battery current, current from energy source

  12. deployment • Solar panel 65W • Wind turbine 400W in 28 miles/hr • Charge controller • Load on 13.6V • Load off 12.1V • Battery 12V 105AH • Load: 60W bulb

  13. Solar power model • Compute solar power from radiation • Linear regression • Solarpower = 0.0444 * Radiation -2.65

  14. Solar power model • Computing the max possible solar power • Perfect clear and sunny day • MaxPower = a * (Time+b)2 + c • Power = MaxPower*(1 - skycondition)

  15. Wind power model • Power = 0.01787485 * (windspeed)3 – 3.4013 • Turbulent < fitted < steady

  16. Evaluation • Daily difference is small • Forecasting is accurate between 3hr~3day PPF RMSE

  17. Evaluation • Forecast vs PPF vs Conservative • Conservative • Reject all requests w/ durations greater than each node’s expected operation time based on its current reserve of stored energy • 2 cases study simulation • Lease request • Fair sensing rate

  18. Case study I • ViSETestbed • Sensor node: x86-processor connected to sensors • Lease external user access to a slice of its node • Make decision of lease request based on available energy • Node consumes 45~65W • Each request consumes 2.7W • asked at the beginning of each day • Simulation by 5 solar panel(60W) and 5 wind turbine(400W) • Evaluation • Number of leases approved / complete • Battery depletion

  19. Result I • PPF approved more leases than forecast but complete 2/3 of the leases • PPF also deplete its battery with 40%of days

  20. Case study II • Set Lexicographically fair sensing rate based on available energy • 5 TelosB motes in simple tree topology • Compute fair rate for each node every 24hour • 1 solar panel(60W) and 1 wind turbine(400W) • Evaluation • sensing rate • Battery depletion

  21. Result II • PPF sets a higher sensing rate, run out 50% of all days • Forecast depletes less than 5% of all days, but maintain sensing rate 80% of PPF • Conservative sets a rate ~45% of PPF

  22. Conclusion • Weather prediction based on NWS forecast is more accurate than PPF • Validation forecast model with two case studies • Wind power generation of increase when solar power generation decrease

  23. Difference with us • Perpetual operating on the mountain • Deployed on the mountain with drastic weather change • Battery effect • Modeling based on historical solar radiation data not forecast cloudy data

More Related