1 / 5

Quantum Innovation in Public Policy: Shaping Future Winners and Losers

Explore the impact of quantum innovation on political subsystems with a focus on defense, energy, healthcare, education, and more. Learn how social entrepreneurship, billionaires, and tech foundations drive change. Discover strategies for widespread impact and transformation in cities and office parks. Dive into cross-disciplinary solutions for smart growth, sustainability, and public-private partnerships.

varden
Download Presentation

Quantum Innovation in Public Policy: Shaping Future Winners and Losers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Quantum Innovation / Public Policy (Burke) Innovations produce winners & losers Political subsystems favor incremental change ag, defense, energy, transit, healthcare, edu, etc. “analysis is politics by other means” Auto/highway subsystem trumps transit Public sector: huge penalty for failure Media stifles innovation, accentuates conflict Macropolitical system can impose quantum change – earmarks, etc ’79+: mature democracy, entrenched interests Billionaires & tech foundations: quantum Dubai too.

  2. Social Entrepreneurism micro-credit, India street kids, AIDs education Problem for Americans: heal thyself for credibility Act local (small $), strive for widespread impact Fix 1 suburb  world is saved (viral spread, mutation) Government is not the solution resistant, but good follower S. E. characteristics: Boring at dinner parties Driven, stamina, undeterred “Ends" oriented Will change/refine tactics Listener (behavioral) Cross-disciplinary, practical. By David Bornstein

  3. Cities21 Transforming Office Parks grant • Bootstrapping • 200 page masters thesis: Palo Alto office park • Berkeley’s Cervero advised. 300 meetings in Bay Area • 2-year schmooze for 65 surveys at Roche Bioscience • Better data  credibility • Published papers  differentiation from crazy “foamers” • Very enthusiastic EPA BWC endorsement • James Paxson • Pleasanton Hacienda Business Park Owners Association • EPA BWC & other awards • Active in professional organizations & committees • Participates in multiple transp. / smart growth studies • Extremely high social IQ • Topic: extreme smart growth (don’t want to miss out).

  4. Grant, continued • Paxson quote: • A unique location for early adoption of PRT • If EPA-backed study makes a compelling case for a system => strong likelihood of public/private partnership to bring system to reality • Partners • Metropolitan Transportation Commission: MPO • Cambridge Systematics (#1 transp. consultant, contributed to the Palo Alto methodology, HBP corridor study, nice quote) • PeopleSoft (Oracle) – 225 invasive employee interviews • Free lunches! Oracle needs to reassure Pleasanton • Billionaire Larry Ellison • Congestion Mgmt Agency • Local bus transit agency • East Bay Community Foundation • CCLR (brownfields recycling) • $56K in-kind partner contribution • Partners led to more partners: BART, Bay Area Council.

  5. Given grant, use EPA clout • Company town housing & social justice • Convene policy discussions at EPA SF and DC • No problem attracting thought-leaders..

More Related