1 / 17

Chemometrics On-line Initiative (COLI) A CPAC Industry Initiative

Chemometrics On-line Initiative (COLI) A CPAC Industry Initiative. David Marrow, ExxonMobil Chemical and Charles Miller, DuPont. IFPAC 2002 San Diego, CA January 23, 2002. Our Mission:. To facilitate the successful application of existing and new Chemometric techniques

valmai
Download Presentation

Chemometrics On-line Initiative (COLI) A CPAC Industry Initiative

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chemometrics On-line Initiative (COLI)A CPAC Industry Initiative David Marrow, ExxonMobil Chemical and Charles Miller, DuPont IFPAC 2002San Diego, CA January 23, 2002

  2. Our Mission: To facilitate the successful application of existing and new Chemometric techniques for on-line Process Analytics

  3. Background • It has long been shown that Chemometrics has the capability of improving the functionality of real-time process analysis, because of its well-documented capability of converting non-selective analyzer data into information • Unfortunately, we believe that much of this potential has yet to be realized, due to the practical difficulties in implementing chemometrics tools in an on-line environment • In response to this, the Chemometics On-Line Initiative (COLI), sponsored by CPAC, has been established.

  4. Off-Line versus On-Line Environment On-line environment Off-line environment

  5. What is being done now? • Instrument vendor software approach • Third-Party software solutions

  6. Instrument Vendor Software Approach • Because the off-line modeling and on-line implementation environments are contained within the same software, transferability of models for run-time implementation is (presumably..) greatly facilitated • Historically, with “simpler” chemometric tools, this approach has worked reasonably well • However, it has become increasingly difficult for instrument vendors to supply all of the chemometrics tools that are in demand- for both the off-line and on-line environments • repertoire of chemometric “tools” that are available • essential model-building peripherals (such as data cleaning, editing, data and model management) in the off-line environment • model diagnostics and updating capabilities in the on-line environment.

  7. Third Party Software Solutions • If instrument vendor’s software is not capable, use a third party chemometrics software to develop models in the off-line environment • Then, write custom run-time software to implement the model in the on-line environment • However, this approach also has several problems associated with it: • programming resources required • closed architecture limits access to “alternative” Chemometric techniques • solutions not generally transferable between applications • support issues with regard to the run-time software • difficult to implement in many cases, due to closed architecture of instrument vendor software

  8. What are the issues? • Closed architecture of analyzer vendor software • Closed architecture of third party chemometric development software platforms • Stability of the runtime predictor software • Clear definition of “boundaries” on overall system support responsibilities for instrument vendors, chemometrics software vendors, and any third-party software/hardware producers

  9. What is our Vision? • an “openly” available system in which one could efficiently and safely implement chemometric models in a run-time environment, regardless of both the off-line modeling environment and the on-line instrument environment, through: • specification of a run-time data processing platform • run-time data processing protocols • standardized data formats, and • standardized model formats, • develop a mechanism to develop, adapt, test and apply Chemometric techniques for on-line process analysis.

  10. Our Strategy • NOT to develop, maintain or support any software! • Supply vendors with preferred data formats, processing protocols, etc; and let them develop their own solutions!

  11. COLI Mechanism Model Standard run-time data processing protocols Standard I/O expression protocol and guidelines syntax for for run-time run-time data models processing requests Link to Instrument Development Model ext . data Type 1 X- lator Environment 1 processing Link to Development Instrument Model ext . data X- lator Environment 2 Type 2 processing Run-time Data Processing Platform Link to Development Instrument Model ext . data X- lator Environment 3 Type 3 processing Link to Development Instrument Model ext . data X- lator Environment 4 Type 4 processing To controlsystem

  12. Survey of Current Solutions • Chemometrics vendor run-time predictor software • Infometrix • CAMO • Eigenvector • Mathworks • “In-house” solutions • MSPC application (DuPont) • Unique analyzer vendor solutions • etc….

  13. COLI Deliverables • standard data format • standard model formats/model “expression” in run-time environment • a data base of standardized algorithms and coding (for a selected list of chemometrics tools) • an evaluation of candidate run-time platforms (existing and potential) with respect to current and future capabilities • uniform model for users, analyzer and chemometric software vendors

  14. Anticipated COLI Benefits • Easier, less costly implementation of chemometrics methods for real-time usage • All COLI-developed standards will be public domain • Will enable more careful implementation of chemometrics for on-line applications • Will be easier to test new chemometric methods in an on-line environment • COLI-developed standards could also be applied to real-time process chemometrics and laboratory analyzers • Easier “compartmentalization” of off-line modeling, real-time data processing, and on-line instrument functions • thus facilitating the assignment of maintenance and support responsibilities, • and allowing modeling and instrument vendors to focus on “what they do best”

  15. The COLI Steering Team- thus far... • Sponsors • CPAC- Dave Veltkamp • Leaders • Dave Marrow, Chuck Miller • Industrial “End-Users” • 6 companies currently represented • Chemometrics Software vendors • 4 represented (Infometrix, CAMO, The Math Works, Eigenvector Technologies) • Instrument vendors • 3 represented (Kaiser, Orbital, Foss) • Academia • U. Delaware

  16. Current Status • Mission statement completed • Steering team formed • Survey of current on-line solutions • End-user questionnaire being developed • Face-to-face meeting at FACSS 2001 • Planned meeting at IFPAC 2002 (San Diego) • Standard Data Set Object for PLS Toolbox (Matlab) developed by Eigenvector

  17. Path Forward • Complete questionnaire, distribute to end-users • “Nail down” the scope of effort • Finalize steering team • ensure good distribution of 4 sectors: end-users, instrument vendors, software/chemometrics vendors, and academia • IFPAC 2002 - face to face meeting

More Related