1 / 25

North American Profile: Partnership across borders.

North American Profile: Partnership across borders. Sharon Shin, Metadata Coordinator, Federal Geographic Data Committee Raphael Sussman; Manager, Lands Information Ontario. What is the NAP. Community profile of ISO 19115 Geospatial Information – Metadata

valin
Download Presentation

North American Profile: Partnership across borders.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. North American Profile: Partnership across borders. Sharon Shin, Metadata Coordinator, Federal Geographic Data Committee Raphael Sussman; Manager, Lands Information Ontario

  2. What is the NAP • Community profile of ISO 19115 Geospatial Information – Metadata • Addresses metadata for geographic products. • Negotiated content between the ANSI and CGSB representatives. • Format: Profile with “best practices” and simplified diagrams for training, UML in annex

  3. Net Benefits of Metadata • For data distributors: Metadata makes data sharing: • easier, • less risky, and • cheaper • For all enterprises: Metadata reduces the cost of losing information about spatial data assets, thereby • increasing the usability of those assets over time. • Sustaining and value of the assets

  4. Interoperability Issues(Service Metadata) • Portals, using Internet, Intranet, and Extranet • displays and/or integrates data normally intended for use with specific, disparate applications without those applications • uses data from multiple sources without clearly defining quality or source of individual features

  5. Interoperability Issues • Web Services • Discovery of Services (including data services) by computers rather than by people • Simultaneous incorporation of live data from many sources (eg Web Map Services) originally created or stored in different formats, models, or quality

  6. What’s similar/new with NAP Metadata • Content • CSDGM similar and new elements • Domains and conditionality • Essential, as opposed to core, metadata • Format • UML / XML • Multi-level metadata- • Feature to Dataset Series or Service

  7. Metadata Entity Set Information Identification Information Constraints Data Quality Information Maintenance Information Spatial Representation Information Reference System Information Content Information Portrayal Catalogue Information- new Distribution Information Application Schema Information - new Major Classes

  8. ISO Metadata / CSDGM Similar Content • Conditionality • Same Abstract Metadata Standard Name • New terminology and definitions CSDGM = Originator ISO = Responsible Party - Role

  9. ISO Metadata: Core Elements mandatory

  10. NAP: Essential Metadata • Requires reviewing the entire standard to determine what is minimal metadata for each user. • Metadata Record Information – 7 mandatory • Identification Information- 3 mandatory All optional shown with the number of mandatory attributes/subclasses: • Data Quality 1 • Maintenance Info 1 • Descriptive Keywords 1 • Resource Constraints 0 +1 • Aggregate Info 1 • Spatial Representation Info 4 + 7 • Reference System Info 1 • Content Info 2 or 3 + 2 • Distribution Info 2 +1

  11. Formats Attribute Instance actual % water salinity Attribute Type salinity Feature Type marsh Dataset Paducah wetlands Data Series wetlands

  12. Lands Information Ontario Agreement • FGDC, FGDC Metadata Working Group, Land Information Ontario FGDC • Update materials, beginning May 1, 2008 and continuing to November 2009

  13. LIO • March 12, 2009 – • 3 hr Webinar • ~ 500 registants • 3 – 5 yr Marketing plan to implement NAP

  14. Graphic Representation

  15. Graphic Representation NAP

  16. NAP Training Moduleshttp://www.fgdc.gov/training/training-materials

  17. NAP Guidance Documents

  18. Tools • FGDC sponsored ISO metadata editor review. • URL:http://www.fgdc.gov/participation/working-groups-subcommittees/mwg/ • ISO/NAP Validation tool • CSDGM to ISO 19115 Conversion tool

  19. Contacts • Raphael Sussman- Manager • Land Information Ontario • raphael.sussman@ontario.ca • Sharon Shin- Metadata Coordinator • Federal Geographic Data Committee • sshin@usgs.gov

  20. Supplemental Slides

  21. ISO19115:2003 Geographic Information - Metadata State Profile Navigation Profile ANZLIC Profile European Profile NATO Profile North American Profile EO Profile Perfil Latinoamericano de Metadata The FoundationRegional, national, & organizational profiles

  22. What is ISO 19115 Geospatial Information - Metadata • Provides a schema for describing geographic data and services. • Applies to multiple levels of geographic information. • Defines a core set of metadata required to serve the full range of applications. • Allows for multilingual metadata • Establishes: • terminology • definitions • conditionality

  23. North American Profile of ISO 19115 Metadata North American Profile of ISO 19115 Metadata Co-located Meetings Parallel Development MOU between Canada and the USA

  24. NAP: Essential Metadata • Requires reviewing the entire standard to determine what is minimal metadata for each user. • Metadata Record Information – 7 mandatory • Identification Information- 3 mandatory All optional with the number of mandatory attributes/subclasses: • Data Quality 1 • Maintenance Info 1 • Descriptive Keywords 1 • Resource Constraints 0 +1 • Aggregate Info 1 • Spatial Representation Info • 4 + 7 • Reference System Info 1 • Content Info 2 or 3 + 2 • Distribution Info 2 +1

  25. ISO Metadata: Content- Domains and Conditionality • Fewer mandatory elements • Fixed domains and code lists in place of free text to control vocabulary and improve discovery • More optional elements

More Related