1 / 25

Knocking at the College Door

Knocking at the College Door. 1988 to 2018. Presentation for SHEEO/NCES Network Conference and IPEDS Workshop March 31, 2004 – Washington, DC. Cheryl Blanco Director, Policy Analysis & Research and Jacquelyn Stirn, Research Associate WICHE. History. 6 th Edition of the projections.

uttara
Download Presentation

Knocking at the College Door

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Knocking at the College Door 1988 to 2018 Presentation for SHEEO/NCES Network Conference and IPEDS Workshop March 31, 2004 – Washington, DC Cheryl Blanco Director, Policy Analysis & Research and Jacquelyn Stirn, Research Associate WICHE

  2. History • 6th Edition of the projections • Includes projections by race/ethnicity and public/private school, like previous edition Includes projections of graduates by income for the first time • Provides actual data for 1987-88 through 2001-02

  3. Birth Data • Birth data was collected from the Monthly Vital Statistics Reports from the National Center for Health Statistics. • http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/mvsr/supp/46-45/46-45.htm

  4. Enrollment and Graduate Data • Public • Data directly from the states • Easier and more difficult than the last time • Race/ethnic data more complicated

  5. Nonpublic Data • Nonpublic • Some states could provide data • NCES Private School Survey raw data • Compare with the previous data • More difficult than the last time

  6. Income Data Sources • Common Core of Data district level data • Census School District Tabulation for income information • Other methods and sources detailed in the publication

  7. Methodology • Cohort Survival Methodology • Better in the short term • Weaker in the long term

  8. Some Provisos • Projections, not Predictions • No way to account for the effect of: • NCLB and other accountability measures • New state policy objectives • Reductions in funding that might affect access

  9. Who’s Knocking? • 3.2 million high school graduates, forecast for 2008-09 – 8% higher than today • More minority students than ever: almost 43% of enrollments by 2007-08 (a 23% increase in five years)

  10. The West and the South will see increases The Northeast and Midwest won’t see much change Among the Regions South • Graduates West Midwest Northeast • Enrollment • The South still dominates in school enrollments, thanks to population shifts in the last decade • The West bumps the Midwest from the #2 slot.

  11. How things will change Percent Change in Number of Public and Nonpublic High School Graduates by State, U.S., 2001-02 (actual) and 2017-18 (projected) Source: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, 2003.

  12. Some states will see significant losses Percent Change in Number of Public and Nonpublic High School Graduates by State, U.S., 2001-02 (actual) and 2017-18 (projected) Source: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, 2003.

  13. Some will see manageable losses Percent Change in Number of Public and Nonpublic High School Graduates by State, U.S., 2001-02 (actual) and 2017-18 (projected) Source: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, 2003.

  14. Others will see manageable growth Percent Change in Number of Public and Nonpublic High School Graduates by State, U.S., 2001-02 (actual) and 2017-18 (projected) Source: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, 2003.

  15. A number of states will see considerable growth Percent Change in Number of Public and Nonpublic High School Graduates by State, U.S., 2001-02 (actual) and 2017-18 (projected) Source: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, 2003.

  16. A few are looking at significant increases Percent Change in Number of Public and Nonpublic High School Graduates by State, U.S., 2001-02 (actual) and 2017-18 (projected) Source: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, 2003.

  17. Two are off the charts Percent Change in Number of Public and Nonpublic High School Graduates by State, U.S., 2001-02 (actual) and 2017-18 (projected) Source: Western Interstate Commission for Higher Education, 2003.

  18. Fewer graduates in 4 Western states in 2018

  19. West Midwest Northeast South American Indian/Alaska Native Asian/Pacific Islander Black, non-Hispanic Hispanic White, non-Hispanic The New Minority Majority • The West is projected to be a minority majority region for the class of 2010 • The South will follow suit in 2015 • 11 states and the District of Columbia will be minority majority by the class of 2014: Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Maryland, Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, Texas • What’s driving the trend: A surge in Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander student enrollment.

  20. More Hispanics and Asian/Pacific Islander Graduates – Fewer White, non-Hispanics

  21. About half of high school graduates will be from families earning under $50,000

  22. West Midwest Northeast South Family Income Data: A Baseline • The South is expected to have the highest proportion of graduates in the lowest income group (under $20,000): nearly 1 in every 5 grads in the class of 2007 • About 17 percent of graduates in the West will be from this income group • The Midwest and Northeast will see about 13 percent each • Expect proportionally more graduates in the lowest income group in Alaska, California, Iowa, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Washington, and Wyoming

  23. U.S. 17% NM 27% CO 12% CA 18% Within Each Region: Lots of Variability A look at the lows – The Nation: 17% of grads will be low income In the West:

  24. NM 7% CO 17% CA 18% U.S. 14% Within Each Region: Lots of Variability A look at the highs – The Nation: 14% of grads will be high income In the West:

  25. Contact Us – Cheryl Blanco Director, Policy Analysis and Research WICHE cblanco@wiche.edu 303.541.0221 www.wiche.edu Jacquelyn Stirn Consultant jstirn@yahoo.com

More Related