Language acquisition
Download
1 / 70

Language Acquisition - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 275 Views
  • Updated On :
loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Language Acquisition' - urit


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Language acquisition l.jpg

Lecture 10 30 Nov., 2005

Language Acquisition

Helena Gao


Slide3 l.jpg

Required readings: 30 Nov., 2005

  • Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing A Language. A Uage-Based Thoery of Language Acquisition. Harvard University Press. Chapter two: Origins of Language. pp. 8-42

  • Lee, T. H. (2002). Two types of logical structure in child language. Journal of Cognitive Science 3: 155-182.

  • Pinker, S. (1994). The Language Instinct. New York: Morrow. Chapter 1: An instinct to acquire an art. pp. 15-24.

    Recommended readings:

  • Pinker, S. (1995). Language acquisition. In L. R. Gleitman, M. Liberman, and D. N. Osherson (eds.), An invitation to cognitive science. 2nd Ed. Volume 1: Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Chapter 5: Why the child holded the baby rabbits: A case study in language acquisition. pp. 107-133.

  • Gould, J. L., & Marler, P. (1987). Learning by Instinct. Reprinted as Chapter 7 in Wang, W. S.-Y. (ed.), (1991), The Emergence of Language: Development and Evolution; Readings from Scientific American Magazine, pp. 88-103. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.

  • Moskowitz, B. A. (1978). The Acquisition of Language. Reprinted as Chapter 10 in Wang, W. S.-Y. (ed.), (1991), The Emergence of Language: Development and Evolution; Readings from Scientific American Magazine, pp. 131-149. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.


Language acquisition theories l.jpg
Language acquisition theories 30 Nov., 2005

Two types of perspectives

  • centered around “nurture” and “nature” distinction or on “empiricism” and “nativism”.

  • Empiricism: all knowledge comes from experience, ultimately from our interaction with the environment through our reasoning or senses.

  • Nativism: at least some knowledge is not acquired through interaction with the environment, but is genetically transmitted and innate.

    • neither nurturists (environmentalists) disagree thoroughly with the nativist ideas nor do nativists with the nurturist ideas.


Usage based accounts theory of language acquisition l.jpg
Usage Based Accounts – Theory of Language Acquisition 30 Nov., 2005

  • Supported by recent research

  • characterize children’s language in terms of cognitive and communicative processes involved

  • children’s early language based on specific linguistic items and expressions they comprehend and produce

  • Three processes involved:

    • Imitative learning

    • Finding patterns in language

    • Combining linguistic constructions creatively


Tomasello s view 2003 l.jpg
Tomasello’s View (2003) 30 Nov., 2005

  • The human uses of symbols is primary, with the most likely evolutionary scenario being that the human species evolved skills enabling the use of linguistic symbols phylogenetically (p. 9)

  • The human adaptation for symbolic communication emerges in human ontogeny quite predictably across cultures at around 1 year of age. It emerges in the context of a whole suite of new social-cognitive skills, the most important for language acquisition being the establishment of joint attentional frames, the understanding communicative intentions, and a particular type of cultural learning known as role reversal imitation. (p. 19)


Early skills of intention reading l.jpg
Early skills of Intention-reading 30 Nov., 2005

  • (1) The joint attentional frame

    • Joint attentional frames are defined intentionally, that is, they gain their identity and coherence from the child’s and the adult’s understandings of “what we are doing” in terms of the goal-directed activities in which we are engaged. (p. 22)

  • (2) Understanding communicative intentions

    • Children understand adult communicative intentions, including those expressed in linguistic utterances, most readily inside the common ground established by joint attentional frames. (p. 24)

  • (3) Cultural learning in the form of role reversal imitation

    • Children who understand that other persons have intentional relations to the world, similar to their own, may attend especially carefully to the behavioral means that these persons have devised for meeting their goals, and so may imitate their intentional actions. (p. 26)


The development of grammar l.jpg
The development of grammar 30 Nov., 2005

  • Behavioural theory  Language acquired through learning (e.g., operant conditioning, imitation)

  • Parents and teachers model grammatically correct language and provide feedback

  • Evidence?


Theories of grammar development l.jpg
Theories of grammar development 30 Nov., 2005

1. Behavioural theory

  • Evidence more contrary than supportive.

    Brown and Hanlon (1970)  3 findings

  • Ungrammatical sentences rarely corrected

    • Child:“Doggie bited daddy”

    • Mother: “Yes, that’s right”

  • Sentence corrected only if they are untrue

    • Child (sees a car):“Dere’s a truck”

    • Mother: “No, that’s a car”

  • Ungrammatical requests as likely to be fulfilled as ungrammatical requests


Theories of grammar development10 l.jpg
Theories of grammar development 30 Nov., 2005

1. Behavioural theory

  • Evidence more contrary than supportive.

  • Imitation?

    • Adults don’t use telegraphic speech

    • Adults don’t over-regularize verbs


Theories of grammar development11 l.jpg
Theories of grammar development 30 Nov., 2005

  • Nativist/linguistic perspective

  • Acquisition of grammar too complex, too rapid to be the result of learning

  • Poverty of the stimulus

  • Chomsky: Language Acquisition Device

  • Genetically-specified grammatical processor

  • Recent evolutionary adaptation

  • Evidence?


Slide12 l.jpg

Theories of grammar development 30 Nov., 2005

  • Cross-linguistic Languages of the world conform to a Universal Grammar (Chomsky)

  • Genetic Grammatical impairments run in families (Pinker)

  • Comparative  Our closest evolutionary ancestors (Chimps) cannot learn grammar

  • Dissociations  Language and general intelligence dissociate in Williams Syndrome

  • Developmental Grammar acquired effortlessly and systematically


Imitation research findings l.jpg
Imitation - Research findings 30 Nov., 2005

  • In early infancy there is some face-to-face dyadic mimicking of behaviors (Meltzoff & Moor, 1977)

  • Meltzoff (1995) found 18-month-olds appeared to understand what the adult intended to do and performed the action instead of just mimicking the adult’s actual behavior.

  • Aktar & Tomasello (1998a) investigated infants’ imitation of accidental actions vs. intentional actions. They found that 16-month-olds mainly produced the adult’s intentional actions (there) but not the accidental ones (Woops!)


Slide14 l.jpg

Meltzoff, A. N. & Moore, M.K (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198. 75-78

2- to 3-day-old infants imitating (a) tongue protrusion, (b) mouth opening, and lip protrusion demonstrated by adult experimenters. gestures by human neonates.


Early skills of pattern finding l.jpg
Early Skills of Pattern-Finding manual gestures by human neonates.

  • Human infants are experts from early in development in finding visual patterns (Haith & Benson, 1997)

  • Synthesized speech exposed to 8-month-olds (Saffran, Aslin, & Newport, 1996). Infants prefered to listen to the origial ones heard.

  • Marcus et al. (1999) found that 7-month-olds preferred the speech stream containing the same tri-syllabic nonsense “words” that have the same pattern (e.g., bapopo) as they originally heard (e.g., wididi, delili)

  • Gomez & Gerken (1999) found very similar results with 12-month-olds.

    • These results indicate that prelinguistic infants are able to find patterns in auditory stimuli of an abstract nature. (Tomasello, 2003: 30)


Universal pattern of language development l.jpg

complex grammar manual gestures by human neonates.

2 word

1 word

babble

6-10 mo

12 mo

18 mo

36 mo

Universal pattern of language development

The same pattern is observed in every culture

This suggests that language is acquired as a result of highly specialized biologically programmed mechanisms operating on the linguistic input.


Language development stages and rule systems l.jpg
Language Development: Stages and Rule Systems manual gestures by human neonates.

  • Brown’s (1973) Stages Mean Length of Utterance is a good index of child’s language maturity. Stages indicate growth of language complexity.

    Stage 1 - 12 to 26 months of age = MLU 1.00 to 2.00

    Stage 2 - 27 to 30 months of age = MLU 2.00 to 2.50

    Stage 3 - 31 to 34 months of age = MLU 2.50 to 3.00

    Stage 4 - 35 to 40 months of age = MLU 3.00 to 3.75

    Stage 5 - 41 to 46 months of age = MLU 3.75 to 4.50


Sensitive periods isolated children l.jpg
Sensitive periods: Isolated children manual gestures by human neonates.

Genie was an isolated child… as an infant she was locked away and not spoken to. She was discovered by the authorities when aged 13. Though she acquired words, she never acquired correct grammar:


Isolated children cont l.jpg
Isolated children (cont.) manual gestures by human neonates.

By contrast, Isabelle and her mute, brain-damaged mother escaped from the imprisonment of her grandfather when she was aged 6½. Within eighteen months, her language was not significantly behind the level expected at her age:


Language exposure and language use l.jpg
Language Exposure and Language Use manual gestures by human neonates.

  • Cameron-Faulkner, Lieven, and Tomasello (2003)

    • examined 12 English-speaking mothers’ speech during samples of their linguistic interactions with their 2- to 3-year-old children


The overall findings l.jpg
The overall findings: manual gestures by human neonates.

  • Children heard an estimated 5000 to 7000 utterances per day

  • Between one-quarter and one-third of these were questions.

  • More than 20% of these were not full adult sentences, but rather some kind of fragment (most often a noun phrase or prepositional phrase)

  • About one-quarter of these were imperatives and utterances structured by the copula

  • Only about 15% of these had the canonical English SVO form (i.e., transitive utterances of various kinds) supposedly characteristic of the English language; and over 80% of the SVOs had a pronoun subject.


Slide22 l.jpg

The specific words and phrases with which mothers initiated utterances:

Are you ..., I'll ..., It's ..., Can you ...., Here’s ...., Let's ..., Look at ..., What did ..., etc.


Slide23 l.jpg


Slide24 l.jpg

  • More than 65% of all of the mothers’ utterances began with one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • Approximately 45% of all maternal utterances began with one of just 17 lexemes:

    • What (8.6%), That (5.3%), It (4.2%), You (3.1%), Are/Aren't (3.0%), Do/Does/Did/Don't (2.9%), I (2.9%), Is (2.3%), Shall (2.1%), A (1.7%), Can/Can't (1.7%), Where (1.6%), There (1.5%), Who (1.4%), Come (1.0%), Look (1.0%), and Let's (1.0%).

  • Children used many of these same item-based frames in their speech, in some cases at a rate that correlated highly with their own mother's frequency of use.


Cameron faulkner lieven tomasello 2003 l.jpg

Cameron-Faulkner, Lieven, & Tomasello (2003) one of just 156 item-based frames.

What’s .18 Where’s .05

What’re .09 Where’re .02

What do .05 Where shall .01

What did .04

What has .03 Who’s .08

What about .03 Who did .01

What shall .02

What can .02 Which one .02

What does .02

What hppnd .01 Why don’t .01

What were .01

What kind of .01 How many .01

31 frames =>

80% of Wh Qs

13 frames =>

65% of Wh Qs


Early gestures l.jpg
Early Gestures one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • Human infants produce three main types of gestures:

    • Reutilizations

    • Deictic gestures

    • Symbolic gestures

  • Gestures run the gamut from non-symbolic to symbolic – and emerge along with the first linguistic skills – is strong evidence that children’s ability to communicate symbolically is not tied specially to language but rather emanates from a more fundamental set of social-cognitive skills (Tomasello & Camaiono, 1997)


Early holophrases l.jpg
Early Holophrases one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • An important issue for later language development is what parts of adult expressions children choose for their initial holophrases.

  • The answer presumably lies in the specific language they are learning and the kinds of discourse in which they participate with adults, including the perceptual salience of particular words and phrases in adults’ speech (Slobin, 1985)


Early holophrases language specific l.jpg
Early Holophrases – language specific one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • In English, most beginning language learners acquire a number of so-called relational words such as more, gone, up, down, on and off, presumably because adults use these words in salient ways to talk about salient event s (Blom, Tinker, and Margulis, 1993; McCune, 1992)

    • Many of these words are verb particles in adult English and so the child at some point must learn to talk about the same events with phrasal verbs such as pick up, get down, put on, and take off.

  • In Korean and Mandarin Chinese, in contrast, children learn fully adult verbs from the onset f language development because these verbs are most salient in adult speech to them (parallel to an English verb like remove for clothing: Choi & Gonpnik, 1996: Gopnik & Choi, 1995; Tardif, 1996)


Thomas lee s data 2002 l.jpg
Thomas Lee’s data (2002) one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • Mandarin-speaking children’s Sensitivity to quantifier type and thematic roles in their understanding of inverse scope for sentences.

  • Suggestion

    • Young children (about 4yeasrs of age) are sensitive to constraints of the conceptual-intentional system on quantifier scope interpretation


Phonological development l.jpg
Phonological development one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • Systematic age-related changes in the ability to perceive and produce the elementary sounds of language.


Phonological development31 l.jpg
Phonological development one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • Categorical phoneme perception at 1 month

  • Vowel discrimination at 2 months

  • Loss of the ability to discriminate non-native phonemes by the end of the 1st year


Slide32 l.jpg

Phonological development one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • 6-8 weeks  cooing (vowel-like sounds with consonant produced by closure of the back of the mouth (e.g., “g” or “k”)

  • Later, comes to include consonants produced by closure of the front of the mouth (e.g., “m” or “b”)


Slide33 l.jpg

Phonological development one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • 3 to 6 months  Emergence of babbling, the production of consonant-vowel combinations like “da” and “ba”

  • Reduplicated babbling  Repetition of C-V combinations

  • 9 to 10 months  More complex combinations


Slide34 l.jpg

Phonological development one of just 156 item-based frames.

Interesting babbling facts

  • Cross-linguistic consistency in the timing of the onset of cooing and babbling, although some cross-linguistic differences in the sounds produced

  • Deaf infants babble in the first months of life


Learning words l.jpg
Learning words one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • Evidence of word-comprehension @ 6 months (Tincoff & Juszyck, 1999) .

  • By 6, children understand over 5,000 different words.

  • 20 new words a week for 5 years!!!


Learning words36 l.jpg
Learning words one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • Words learning begins during mother-infant interaction.

  • Best when child focussed on object, and mother labels it.

  • Association formed.

  • How does child know what the word refers to?


Learning words37 l.jpg
Learning words one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • What are the words that infants first learn?

  • Nelson (1973)  First words name objects (65%), or actions (14%).

  • Do infants’ first words have the same meaning they do for adults?


Learning words38 l.jpg
Learning words one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • No: Often different from adult meanings.

  • Overextensions.

  • Meaning of a word overgeneralized.

  • "Dog" for any animal with 4 legs.

  • Underextensions.

  • Meaning of a word too constrained.

  • Car refers only to child’s father’s car.


Learning words39 l.jpg
Learning words one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • Most frequently used words? Goplink (1982)

  • Longitudinal, home-observation study.

  • Before 24 months, children most frequently use words that provide commentary on their ongoing activity.

  • "Gone", "there", "oh dear", "down".


Early word comprehension l.jpg
Early word comprehension one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • 7-8 months olds. Typical early understood words: mummy, daddy, clock, drink, teddy (Harris, et al., 1995)

  • Acquire 5 to 10 words a day from about 15th month through the 6th year of life (Gleitman and Cleitman, 1992)

  • Vocabulary spurt: total number of words grow fairly steadily until 12 months of age, when there will typically be a sharp increase in vocabulary

Average number of words understood by boys and firls bet. 8 and 16 months

of age (Fenson et al. 1994. p. 74)


The development of grammar41 l.jpg
The development of grammar one of just 156 item-based frames.

Telegraphic Speech

  • Examples (Brown, 1973)

  • (1) Agent-action: "Tommy hit"

  • (2) Action-object: "Give cookie"

  • (3) Possessor-possession: "My car"

  • (4) Questions: “Where daddy?”


The development of grammar42 l.jpg
The development of grammar one of just 156 item-based frames.

1. Telegraphic Speech

  • Is telegraphic speech grammatical?

    Braine, 1976  Pivot grammar

    [Pivot word + open word]

    “e.g., More ________”

  • Bloom, 1990

    • No wild grammars (e.g., “Big he”)

    • Gross violations rare (e.g., “Daddy eat” vs “Eat daddy”)


The development of grammar43 l.jpg
The development of grammar one of just 156 item-based frames.

2. Inflectional morphology

  • Rules governing the use of morphemes like inflections (e.g., -s, -ed that alter the, -ing) syntactical function of specific words

  • E.g.,

    • Past tense Acquired in a regular sequence

    • Not all past tenses formed through use of the [stem +“-ed”] rule (E.g., Run/Ran)

  • How do children learn the exceptions?


The development of grammar44 l.jpg
The development of grammar one of just 156 item-based frames.

3. Irregular past-tense

  • Rules governing the use of morphemes like inflections (e.g., -s, -ed that alter the, -ing) syntactical function of specific words Developmental U-shaped curve


The development of grammar45 l.jpg
The development of grammar one of just 156 item-based frames.

3. Irregular past-tense

  • Developmental U-shaped curve

Developmental U-shaped curve

Proportion correct

Time


The development of grammar46 l.jpg
The development of grammar one of just 156 item-based frames.

3. Irregular past-tense

  • Developmental U-shaped curve

  • Irregular form learned first. “Ran”

  • Then over-regularization occurs. “Runned”

  • Finally, irregular forms reappear. “Ran”

  • Why does this occur?


The development of grammar47 l.jpg
The development of grammar one of just 156 item-based frames.

3. Irregular past-tense

  • Competing mechanisms

  • Irregulars first learned through association.

  • Then, children learn the past-tense rule.

  • Over-applied.

  • Must re-learn the exceptions.


Theories of cognitive and language development piaget vygotsky and bruner comparisons and contrasts l.jpg
Theories of Cognitive and Language Development: one of just 156 item-based frames. Piaget, Vygotsky and Bruner - Comparisons and Contrasts


Outline l.jpg
Outline one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • Brief review of Piaget’s theory

  • The role of culture - implications for Piaget’s theory

  • The theory of Vygotsky

  • The theory of Bruner


Summary of piaget l.jpg
Summary of Piaget one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • Stage theory of development - older children think qualitatively differently to younger children

  • 4 stages:

    • Stage 1: Sensorimoter Period (0-2 years)

    • Stage 2: Pre-operational stage (2-7 years)

    • Stage 3: Concrete Operational Stage (7-11 years)

    • Stage 4: Formal Operational Stage (11+ years)

  • Development is the combined result of:

    • maturation of the brain and nervous system

    • experiences that help children adapt to new environments - adaption: an organism’s ability to fit in with it’s environment.


Alternative to piaget 1 lev vygotsky l.jpg
Alternative to Piaget 1: Lev Vygotsky one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • 1896 - 1934

  • Work remained little known because it was banned by Stalin after Vygotsky’s death

  • Collapse of the Soviet Union meant:

    • greater dialogue between the West and Russia

    • Vygotsky’s work translated into English


Vygotsky s theory the role of culture social interaction l.jpg
Vygotsky’s Theory: The role of culture/social interaction one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • Sociocultural environment ALL IMPORTANT for cognitive development

  • Different contexts create different forms of development

  • Cognitive processes (language, thought, reasoning) develop THROUGH social interaction

  • Development is a product of CULTURE

  • Vygotsky emphasised the role of:

    • social interaction

    • instruction


C entral idea l.jpg
C one of just 156 item-based frames. entral idea

  • Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD):

  • the difference between the level of actual development and potential development


Example from seifert hoffnung hoffnung l.jpg
Example from Seifert, Hoffnung & Hoffnung one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • Parent: Here are four books for you and the same for your brother

  • Child: The same? (He investigates his brother’s pile of books.) No, he has more (spoken with annoyance).

  • Parent: No, really, they’re the same. Take another look.

  • Child: He does have more.

  • Parent:Try laying his out in a row. Then lay yours out too. Then compare

  • Child:(Does as suggested) One two three four . One two three four. The same! (He looks satisfied)


Summary of the role of social interaction l.jpg
Summary of the role of social interaction one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • 1. Confirm existing knowledge

  • 2. Add new information

  • Instruction most effective when:

    • it builds on previous knowledge and skills (e.g. counting)

    • it provides a ‘sensible’ challenge - there’s no point pushing children beyond their potential


Vygotsky s theory the role of language l.jpg
Vygotsky’s theory: The role of language one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • Piaget’s view: language is just another representational system. Underdeveloped until 6 to 7 years of age

  • Vygotsky’s view: language is social and communicative. Essential for cognitive development.

  • Why did Vygotsky think this?

  • Private speech - children talk to themselves


Vygotsky suggested l.jpg
Vygotsky suggested: one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • adults give instructions to children (social speech)

  • children start to use parent’s instructions to direct their own behaviour (private speech)

  • private speech becomes internalised as thought processes (silent statements)

  • Children use this ‘internalised’ speech to plan and organise behaviour => cognitive development


Summary of vygotsky l.jpg
Summary of Vygotsky one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • Culture and social interaction very important in cognitive development

  • Social interaction with knowledgeable others moves development forward - ZPD

  • Language is central to cognitive development:

  • social speech => private speech => thought


Alternative to piaget 2 jerome bruner l.jpg
Alternative to Piaget 2: Jerome Bruner one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • Very influenced by Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s work

  • Responsible for introducing Vygotsky’s work to the non-Soviet world


Bruner s theory similarities with piaget l.jpg
Bruner’s Theory: Similarities with Piaget one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • Socio-Cognitive Stage Theory:

    • Enactive Mode

    • Iconic Mode

    • Symbolic Mode

    • Abstract thinking develops out of concrete thinking


Bruner s theory similarities with vygotsky l.jpg
Bruner’s Theory: Similarities with Vygotsky one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • Interpersonal communication necessary for development - socio -cognitive theory

  • Development relies on active intervention of expert others:

    • SCAFFOLDING

    • Contingency Rule (Wood, 1980)


Bruner s theory the role of language l.jpg
Bruner’s Theory: The role of language one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • Language is important:

  • without language, thought is limited

  • language forms the basis of understanding:

    • prelinguistic thought - games and rituals

    • rituals gradually replaced as adult adds information

    • rituals replaced by linguistic modes of communication


Summary of bruner l.jpg
Summary of Bruner one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • Socio-cognitive stage theory

  • Based on interaction with adults

  • Relies on adults developing reciprocal behaviour with the child


Overall conclusion l.jpg
Overall Conclusion one of just 156 item-based frames.

  • Piaget underestimated the importance of culture and social interaction

  • Vygotsky:

    • social interaction and language necessary for cognitive development

  • Bruner:

    • Stage theory but emphasised role of social interaction and language


Akhtar 1999 abbot smith et al 2001 weird word order l.jpg
Akhtar (1999) & Abbot-Smith et al. (2001) one of just 156 item-based frames. Weird Word Order

English-speaking children hear utterances with “weird word order” (familiar and unfamiliar verbs)

  • “The cow the horse is meeking/pushing” (SOV)

  • They are encouraged to use these same verbs with new characters engaging in these same actions


Akhtar 1999 abbot smith et al 2001 l.jpg
AKHTAR (1999) & ABBOT-SMITH et al. (2001) one of just 156 item-based frames.

Percentage of mean number of utterances which were mismatches, as a function of condition and age group


Slide67 l.jpg

* one of just 156 item-based frames.

*

“look! cookie monster’s tickling big bird”

“look! big bird’s tickling cookie monster”

see also Naigles (1990), Fisher (2000)

Golinkoff et al. 1987


Childers tomasello 2001 developmental psychology l.jpg

Childers & Tomasello (2001) one of just 156 item-based frames. Developmental Psychology

  • Children at 2:6 hear several hundred transitive utterances over

  • 4 days/sessions

    • Either familiar or unfamiliar English verbs

    • With either nouns only in slots or nouns & pronouns (consistent)

  • Test is traditional nonce verb learning

    • child hears nonce verb as intransitive or passive

  • and must produce in transitive


Slide69 l.jpg
Number of children in each condition (out of 10) who produced at least one productive utterance with at least one nonce verb during testing

20% = same as in

previous studies


Development of matrix clauses l.jpg

Diessel & Tomasello, produced at least one productive utterance with at least one nonce verb during testingCognitive Linguistics (2001)

Development of Matrix Clauses