1 / 16

Graphical and Numeric Measurement Station Uncertainty Characterization

Graphical and Numeric Measurement Station Uncertainty Characterization. Scott Sandwith New River Kinematics scott@kinematics.com. Introduction. Network Adjustment (Inputs v. Outputs) Compute and report instrument (station) position variation during Monte Carlo

umed
Download Presentation

Graphical and Numeric Measurement Station Uncertainty Characterization

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Graphical and Numeric Measurement Station Uncertainty Characterization Scott Sandwith New River Kinematics scott@kinematics.com International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment DESY, Hamburg Germany

  2. Introduction • Network Adjustment (Inputs v. Outputs) • Compute and report instrument (station) position variation during Monte Carlo • Save each station position during Monte Carlo computation • Compute std dev of each position/orientation parameter based on the samples • Report station variations • Instrument Position/Orientation Uncertainty Report • Conclusions International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment DESY Hamburg Germany

  3. Communicating Uncertainty Estimates • Understanding and communicating reliable measurement uncertainty • In many cases measurement process uncertainty is difficult to control • Geometry constraints within facility • Methods to characterize and communicate specific influences and dependences are key tools for alignment teams International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment DESY Hamburg Germany

  4. Accelerator Surveys • Inputs • Instruments (Types Stations, Performance, and Environment) • Control/Constraints (Instrument, Levels, Scale Bar(s) Distance) • Point/Observation Network • Reflector and Targeting Offsets, Errors (e.g., hidden pts, vector bars) • Outputs • Network Adjustment • Uncertainty Analysis – Study – Confidence • Points • Stations • Geometry International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment DESY Hamburg Germany

  5. Why Instrument Uncertainties? • Point uncertainties are primary output of interest • To influence pt uncertainty understanding instrument/station uncertainty • Ux, Uy, Uz, URx, URy, URz, U_TA is a key element to influence and control alignment network uncertainty International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment DESY Hamburg Germany

  6. Objective Uncertainty Feedback • Objectively characterizing and visualizing each stations position and orientation uncertainty in context of network is helpful • Understanding influences and dependence that station position and precision plays enables alignment teams to make objective choices on effective optimize station performance and position(s). International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment DESY Hamburg Germany

  7. Case Studies • Individual station uncertainty within network results are presented both graphically and numerically • Evaluation and graphical results show net differences in how measurement network from a station influences component alignment characterization • Outcome  Choices in which sensors are used and how their position(s) within network influence alignment fidelity International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment DESY Hamburg Germany

  8. Simple Example International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment DESY Hamburg Germany

  9. Open Network Effects International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment DESY Hamburg Germany

  10. Uncertainty Comparison Open Network Fixed Total Station Closed Network Fixed Total Station Closed Network Free Network Adjustment International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment DESY Hamburg Germany

  11. Compare: Open/Closed Survey International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment DESY Hamburg Germany

  12. Closed Survey  FreeNet International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment DESY Hamburg Germany

  13. Accelerator Network International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment DESY Hamburg Germany

  14. Free Network Instrument Uncertainty International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment DESY Hamburg Germany

  15. Comparison between Fixed and Freenet International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment DESY Hamburg Germany

  16. Instrument/Station Uncertainty Conclusions • Measure of how encompassing pt network is about each station • Larger instrument uncertainty results if the pt network is within a narrow field of view • When common pt network is uniformly distributed instrument uncertainty looks worse but will provide more conservative estimates of performance • Using variation of station position during Monte Carlo provides a reasonable measure of the rigor of the network International Workshop on Accelerator Alignment DESY Hamburg Germany

More Related