1 / 22

Integrating Academic Assistance Into the Casebook Classroom

Integrating Academic Assistance Into the Casebook Classroom. Courtney G. Lee University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law Jeff Minneti Stetson University College of Law. Objectives.

ulmer
Download Presentation

Integrating Academic Assistance Into the Casebook Classroom

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Integrating Academic Assistance Into the Casebook Classroom Courtney G. Lee University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law Jeff Minneti Stetson University College of Law

  2. Objectives • Understand variables associated with integrating academic assistance into casebook courses and evaluate how the variables may play out in your program • Consider an approach to integrating academic assistance into the casebook classroom • Become familiar with formative and summative assessment strategies that measure academic skill acquisition as well as substantive understanding • Discuss methods for encouraging other faculty members to incorporate academic assistance skills into their classrooms

  3. So What’s this Presentation Really About?

  4. Variables to Consider • Course Subject • Required or elective • Bar tested or non-bar tested • Forum for Delivery of Academic Assistance • Casebook course or supplement to casebook course • Enrollment • 1L, 2L, and/or 3L • Voluntary or involuntary • Mixed ability levels or exclusively struggling students • Managing stigma • Class Size • Small or large • Instructor • Full-time vs. adjunct

  5. Course Subjects • Required vs. Elective Courses • Enrollment Draw • Materials • Content/Coverage • Bar Subjects vs. Non-Bar Subjects • Skills Transfer • Enrollment Draw • Materials Available • Content/Coverage • Utility to Out-of-State Bar Applicants

  6. Forum for Delivery of ASP Skills • Casebook Course vs. Supplemental Course • Integration of skills and substance in materials • Substantive coverage concerns • Course/professor credibility • Exposure to all or some students • Stigma • Perception of students not enrolled

  7. Enrollment • First Year • Early intervention • GPA-based motivation • Possible mislabeling of “late bloomers” • Upper Level • Proximity to bar exam • Demonstrated need for assistance • Lack of motivation

  8. Enrollment • Voluntary vs. Required • Stigma • Reaching students that need help • Unmotivated students’ affect on class • Attrition concerns • Mixed Ability Levels vs. Exclusively At-Risk • Effects on class discussion, grading curve, instruction pace/coverage, stigma • Class size

  9. Enrollment • Managing Stigma • Messaging • Emphasize that legal education is a transformative process, not a race with winners and losers • Encourage students to set academic goals focused on best efforts and mastery of material, not specific grades • Emphasize that law school and the legal profession have room for individuals with a variety of gifts • Programming • Provide some level of academic assistance programming to all students, not just those at risk or who struggle academically • Integrating • Find ways to get involved in the law school community beyond your work with at risk and struggling students

  10. Class Size • Large vs. Small • Diversity of viewpoints in class discussion • Effectiveness of small-group work • Ease of assessment/providing feedback • Ability to tailor instruction to students’ needs • Formal vs. informal environment • Ability of students to “hide”

  11. Instructor • Full-time vs. Adjunct • Expertise • Institutional knowledge • Accessibility • Commitment to course • Cost

  12. Variables to Consider

  13. Review & Application to Your School • Course Subject • Required or elective • Bar tested or non-bar tested • Forum for Delivery of Academic Assistance • Casebook course or supplement to casebook course • Enrollment • 1L, 2L, and/or 3L • Voluntary or involuntary • Mixed ability levels or exclusively struggling students • Managing stigma • Class Size • Small or large • Instructor • Full-time vs. adjunct

  14. Integrating ASP & the Casebook Classroom • Craft learning objectives that focus on the academic skills and substantive content you seek to develop • Sequence the objectives • Tie the academic skill objectives to casebook content objectives

  15. Crafting & Sequencing Learning Objectives • Academic Assistance Skills • Derive rule statements from cases • Distinguish between rule statements and policy statements in cases • Synthesize rule structures from cases • Generate an outline of a legal topic • Annotate a course outline with case descriptions • Draft an effective explanation of law for an exam response • Draft an effective application of law to fact • Use cases to support legal argument • Use policy to support outcome predictions

  16. Crafting & Sequencing Learning Objectives • Casebook Content Skills • State the three-part test for testator capacity • Explain the elements of undue influence • Apply the elements of undue influence to a fact pattern

  17. Link Skills & Casebook Content Objectives • Derive the three-part test for testator capacity from American Red Cross v. Estate of Haynsworth • Use the courts’ opinions in Carpenter v. Carpenter, Hack v. James, RBC Ministries v. Tompkins, Carter v. Carter, and Taragian v. Watt to synthesize the rule structure for undue influence • Generate an annotated outline of undue influence in light of the courts’ opinions • Through a mock client interview, assess whether a client’s testamentary plan is the product of undue influence

  18. Assessment Strategies Linking Skills & Casebook Content • Formative • Observations during class • Review of case briefs and outlines • Individual or small group conferences • Feedback on ungraded practice questions • Clickers or other surveys • Lawyering-skill exercises • Graded/ungraded quizzes

  19. Assessment Strategies Linking Skills & Casebook Content • Summative • Exam • Lawyering-skill exercises • Could use in place of traditional response to practice question

  20. Encouraging Other Faculty Members • Informal advocacy • Build relationships with casebook professors • Talk with casebook professors about assisting struggling students • Provide workshops for casebook professors • Team-teach workshop(s) with casebook professors • Formal advocacy • Make integration of skills part of strategic plan • Participate on faculty committees • Develop/revise academic policies to reflect integration of academic policies

  21. Objectives Review • Understand variables associated with integrating academic assistance into casebook courses and evaluate how the variables may play out in their programs • Consider an approach to integrating academic assistance into the casebook classroom • Become familiar with formative and summative assessment strategies that measure academic skill acquisition as well as substantive understanding • Discuss methods for encouraging other faculty members to incorporate academic assistance skills into their classrooms

  22. Final Product

More Related