1 / 30

NZ Health System: The Future is Now

NZ Health System: The Future is Now . Slides for discussion with NZIHM 12 May 2009. Coverage of Discussion. Treasury’s interest: Why health matters Long-term fiscal challenges Recent ecc and fiscal deterioration Addressing challenges Not all doom and gloom Current strategies

ula
Download Presentation

NZ Health System: The Future is Now

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. NZ Health System: The Future is Now Slides for discussion with NZIHM 12 May 2009

  2. Coverage of Discussion • Treasury’s interest: • Why health matters • Long-term fiscal challenges • Recent ecc and fiscal deterioration • Addressing challenges • Not all doom and gloom • Current strategies • Design challenges • Getting enough traction? • Tentative Conclusions

  3. Why health sector matters Treasury’s Interest • Health status contributes to NZ’s wellbeing • Ongoing fiscal & performance challenges • Demand side: demographics; chronic disease; rising expectations • Supply side: technology; workforce pressures; clinical sustainability; hospital productivity • Such issues confronting all OECD countries • MoF has ownership and purchase interests • Open questions about adequacy of current institutions (and realistic alternatives) • Mixed evidence on what works, why • Scope to make DHB model work better • Institutions need to endure to get benefits • But evolutionary change may not be enough

  4. Slow growth relative to GDP over 1980-90s across OECD (but not NZ or Aus) NZ health spending grew more than twice GDP growth rate (1995–2005): outlier in OECD Public health expenditure projected to double by 2050 Medium term fiscal settings can’t accommodate base projections NZ long-run health spending growth is highly problematic Treasury’s Interest 1995-2005 (OECD 2007)

  5. Forecast Trading Partner Growth: Now Negative Ecc & Fiscal Deterioration

  6. The bottom line – lower nominal GDP Ecc & Fiscal Deterioration Change in Nominal GDP: Budget v December Downside Sce Annual Nominal GDP

  7. NZ’s Operating Balance Ecc & Fiscal Deterioration OBEGAL to GDP % GDP 5% 4% 3% 2% Historical Years Forecast Years Projected Years 1% 0% -1% -2% -3% -4% -5% 93/94 95/96 97/98 99/00 01/02 03/04 05/06 07/08 09/10 11/12 13/14 15/16 17/18 19/20 21/22 Fiscal Year 7

  8. NZ’s Projected Public Debt Ecc & Fiscal Deterioration GSID to GDP % GDP 80% Historical Years Forecast Years Projected Years 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 93/94 95/96 97/98 99/00 01/02 03/04 05/06 07/08 09/10 11/12 13/14 15/16 17/18 19/20 21/22 Fiscal Year 8

  9. Overall Fiscal Strategy Ecc & Fiscal Deterioration • Future debt profile outside the range Government considers prudent • Government wants to “bend back the debt curve” while managing through tough economic times • The BPS signals the Government’s intention to: • Strengthen the economy • Limit future expenditure growth • Get better value from current spending

  10. It’s not all doom and gloom… Addressing Challenges • Countries can decide level, trajectory and composition of health spending • NZ better placed to contain costs than some: • Easier to restrain spending through budget setting (tax-funded, single payer systems) • NZ has managed cost of pharmaceuticals well • DHB model enables an integrated approach to health care (some local success stories) • Platform to develop better primary health care? • But NZ exposed to global labour market pressures… • How would our current health institutions cope with serious, continuing fiscal constraint?

  11. How NZ has been managing long term fiscal risk in health Addressing challenges • Building wide consensus for moderation • Fiscal risk is serious, urgent and modifiable • Funders, planners, managers and clinicians need to understand • Budget ministers manage health funding within a feasible 10-15 year fiscal path: • Clarifying minimum requirement to maintain value of today’s bundle of services (given feasible efficiency savings) • How much of Government’s allowance for new spending is available for health? • Sector work on managing fiscal sustainability: • Aligns closely with VfM agenda (next slide) • Ministry and DHB level • National, regional and local initiatives

  12. How sector is addressing performance/sustainabilty Addressing challenges • Ministry activity • National targets (top 6 health priorities) • Long-term systems framework & related work • Sector Capability and Innovation Group (benchmarking) • Primary health care strategy (further development) • Service reviews (to identify best spend) • Performance information system • Collective DHB activity • Strategies to address impending workforce pressures • Productivity talks (agreed in last pay settlements) • Regional planning • Procurement strategies • Local DHB/PHO innovations

  13. Questions Raised By Current Institutional Settings Design challenge • Uncertainty about end-state • Reforms could get stuck 2/3s along transition path? • Lack of effective co-ordination mechanisms • Over 100 purchasers for 4 million people • National and regional planning: emerging, mixed • Difficult to mediate differences (esp with tighter budgets) • Perverse incentives undermine full integration • Combination of co-payments and funding formula • Finding appropriate balance in DHB/PHO world: • Powers, rights and responsibilities • Ministers, central agents and arms’ length agencies • Ultimate role/shape of MoH • Rule-setter, referee, mediator, player, advisor, monitor?

  14. 2009 OECD Challenge: DHB/PHO model optimal? Design Challenge • MoH: • Devolve purchase role (circa $2.5b services) • Focus on monitoring, info, strategic advice • DHBs: • More mergers, with hospital contestability • Formally separate purchase from provision • Negotiate at enterprise level, not MECAs • Primary health care: • Better define PHO role or eliminate them • Give DHBs more flexibility to contract/fund

  15. Meeting service needs within affordable budgets will require transformational change Tentative conclusions • NZ relatively well-placed internationally to manage long-term fiscal challenges • Scope for improving VfM within current DHB regime… • MoH and DHBs are identifying key challenges • Mobilise clinical sustainability concerns • Variation in hospital performance = room to improve • …implies huge change management challenge • Likely limits to consensus solutions (speed & scope) • Probable need to revisit institutional settings over time • Does sector have enough sense of urgency • Big question: sufficient pace and scale of change?

  16. Annexes: more detail • Economic and fiscal deterioration • Health spending context • Institutional design challenge • Overview of health sector performance

  17. Large fiscal stimulus in the economy Ecc & Fiscal Deterioration OECD Estimates of Fiscal Stimulus (2007-2010) Contractionary Expansionary

  18. Weaker real growth Ecc & Fiscal Deterioration

  19. Rising forecast unemployment Ecc & Fiscal Deterioration Unemployment rate

  20. Muted forecast price pressures Ecc & Fiscal Deterioration Consumer price inflation

  21. What has changed Ecc & Fiscal Deterioration Tax revenue Benefits Finance costs Total Changes by 30 June 2012 since Budget 08 $5.5 billion $1.2 billion $1.2 billion $7.9 billion

  22. Ecc & Fiscal Deterioration Fiscal toolkit

  23. NZ’s Mounting Demographic Pressures Ecc & Fiscal Context Ratio of those aged 65+ to 15-64 0.6 2009 0.5 0.4 Ratio to population aged 15-64 0.3 0.2 0.1 Older (65+) Projection 0.0 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000 2020 2040 2060 2080 2100 Source: Statistics New Zealand 23

  24. 8% growth path 6.3% growth 16 14 5.8% growth 12 10 5.1% growth % of GDP 8 6 4 2 0 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Fraction of GDP spent on public health services expected to double by 2050… Spending Context • NZ will need to use every $ even more well to deliver required quality and quantity of health services

  25. 12 11 10 Nominal Health expenditure growth (%) 9 8 7 %Growth 6 5 4 NominalGDPexpendituregrowth(%) 3 2 1 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 $5+ billion increase in health expenditure since 1998, but health costs rising too Spending Context

  26. New Zealand’s health spending similar to other OECD countries Spending Context • But watch this space… • NZ’s share of GDP spent on health has just risen above OECD average. 10th highest in OECD in 2006 data

  27. NZ managing pharmaceutical spending well • Growing second slowest in OECD (above only Japan) • Declining proportion of health spending (opposite to OECD trend) • Implies high growth in other areas of health spending • Looks excessive and unsustainable cf OECD – what is the driver in NZ? • Few countries had faster spending growth than NZ (10th overall) • There are clear choices: countries travel at different speeds, different mix

  28. Complexity of health processes Design Challenge • Inherent characteristics of health • Multiple, competing objectives • Joint production process • Probabilistic nature of outcomes/interventions • Demand heavily mediated by clinicians • Asset specificity • Particular NZ features • Dispersed population • Thin supply side (esp for hospital services) • Enduring public preferences (eg 80% public funding; NZ’s particular mix of public and private providers; equity matters) • Public funding directed at providers

  29. Why it’s hard to design health sector institutions Design Challenge • Limits to conventional mechanisms for driving performance: • Central dictates: bind clinician-patient interactions? • Accountability: providers not fully responsible • Performance measurement: multidimensional • Incentives: can undermine intrinsic motivators • Supply-side competition: limited applicability • Patient choice: limited impact on behaviour • Design challenge: creating an environment that reinforces underlying motivators

  30. Performance: Outcomes NZ health outcomes are very mixed picture… • Health status improving, But not as fast as other countries… • NZ’s overall ranking declining • Females compare least favourably • Serious health inequalities • Obesity high and rising • Chronic disease rising Source: OECD Health at a Glance, 2007

More Related