Statewide Local Streets & Roads Needs Assessment Progress Update MTC PTAC September 15, 2008

1. Statewide Local Streets & Roads Needs Assessment Progress UpdateMTC PTACSeptember 15, 2008

2. To determine how much is needed to maintain local streets & roads statewide What is This Study About? $?

3. Sidewalks ADA ramps Curb & gutter Storm drains Others Other Assets

4. How Much Do We Need? To improve conditions $$ To maintain conditions

5. Responses by Agency • 406 responses • 130 have not responded • 23 have popn > 50,000 • 34 have > 100 miles • See list of missing agencies No responses 191 344 responses (64%)

6. Responses by Mileage • 91% total miles • LA (6500 miles) • Hidden Hills (0.3 miles) • 9% no response • 34 agencies >100 miles • Plumas Co (696 miles) • Canyon Lake (2.2 miles) 29% no data 71% data rec’d

7. Responses by Population • 91% of popn • LA (4+ million) • Vernon (95) • Remaining 9% • 18% popn > 50,000 • Oxnard (193k) • Sand City (301) 19% no data 81% data rec’d

8. Counties <80% of miles Counties >80% of miles Responses Received County % Miles Plumas 0% San Benito 0% Mono 6% San Bernardino 64% Ventura 66% Tulare 78%

9. Required Sample Size

10. Are Data Representative?

11. Preliminary Results

12. 380 Survey Responses • Software • 158 use StreetSaver (MTC) • 80 use MicroPAVER • Pavements • 97% had inventory information • 93% reported needs • Non-pavements • 72% had data • Only 54% had funding information

13. “Straightforward” Co. (Amador) Agency Miles Avg. Condition Needs ($-Millions) 5 Yr. 25 Yr. County 410 26 82.8 146.8 Amador 2.9 75 2.5 5.0 Ione 14.1 75 4.0 8.0 Jackson 22 50 3.0 10.0 Plymouth 7 57 2.5 5.1 Sutter Creek 19.8 50 6.0 10.0

14. “Challenging” Co. (Butte) Agency Miles Avg. Condition 5 Yr. Needs ($M) 25 Yr. Needs ($M) County 1,310 76 35 140 Biggs 22 59 1.2 6.6 Chico 242.2 59 8.8 81.6 Gridley 34.8 59 3.5 12.8 Oroville 7 59 3.2 16.8 Paradise 19.8 59 4.2 22

15. Pavement Needs (Butte Co.) Agency 5 Yr. Needs ($M) Revenue ($M) Shortfall ($M) County 35.0 53.5 -- Biggs 1.2 1.0 0.2 Chico 8.8 46.8 -- Gridley 3.5 1.4 2.1 Oroville 3.2 4.3 -- Paradise 4.2 5.6 --

16. Needs Analyses

17. Good / Excellent At Risk Poor Very Poor / Failed Pavement Condition Goals 100 70 50 25 0

18. Needs Analyses • Depends on the condition goal • Best Management Practice = low 80’s • MTC = 75 to BMP • OCTA = 85 • MTA = 62 or 70 • Two philosophies • Implement one statewide standard • Let each agency determine goal

19. PROS Consistent standard Easy to compare agency to agency CONS One standard may not reflect agency’s needs County vs. city roads Perception of “forcing” standard onto an agency One Statewide Goal

20. PROS Agency decides what is most appropriate for them 536 countries united by a common currency CONS Difficult to compare statewide Needs assessment will fluctuate when goals change Leads to inequities Divide between have and have-nots persist Let Each Agency Decide Goal

21. Decisions • What philosophy should we use? • If one statewide goal, what should that be? • Use best management practices as the statewide goal

22. Analysis Period • Two factors to consider • How far do we look into the future? • How long to achieve the goal? • How far? • SB 8 and SHOPP – 10 years • Regional Transportation Plans – 25 years

23. How Long to Reach Goal? Cumulative Total Needs ($) 5 10 25 Time (Years)

24. DECISION • What analysis period should be used? • Use 25 year analysis period; achieve goal within 5-10 years

25. Questions? Contact: Margot Yapp, P.E. myapp@nce.reno.nv.us (510) 215-3620