maryland statewide commission on the crisis in nursing l.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Maryland Statewide Commission on the Crisis in Nursing PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Maryland Statewide Commission on the Crisis in Nursing

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 89

Maryland Statewide Commission on the Crisis in Nursing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 249 Views
  • Uploaded on

Maryland Statewide Commission on the Crisis in Nursing. Update and Future Directions June 5, 2002. Legislated Charge. Convene Summit “Do something”.  “Do something”. COMMISSION. Subcommittees Formed Education Recruitment Retention Workplace Issues. Refined Commission Structure

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Maryland Statewide Commission on the Crisis in Nursing' - Sophia


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
maryland statewide commission on the crisis in nursing

Maryland Statewide Commission on the Crisis in Nursing

Update and Future Directions

June 5, 2002

legislated charge
Legislated Charge
  • Convene Summit

“Do something”

do something4
Subcommittees Formed

Education

Recruitment

Retention

Workplace Issues

Refined Commission Structure

Vice Chairs’ Leadership

Keeping Nurses Informed

 “Do something”
registered nurses active licenses 1996 2000
Registered Nurses - Active Licenses*1996 - 2000

*Registered Nurses - Maryland Addresses

Only

licensed practical nurses active licenses 1996 2000
Licensed Practical Nurses-Active Licenses* 1996- 2000

*Licensed Practice Nurses with

Maryland Addresses

workforce diversity 2001
Workforce Diversity 2001
  • RNs
    • 5% Males
    • 24% Minority
  • LPNs
    • 11% Males
    • 50% Minority
graduations 1997 2001 registered nursing programs
Graduations 1997-2001 Registered Nursing Programs

Baccalaureate totals include RN to BSN students. 1997-1999

statewide commission on the crisis in nursing
Statewide Commission on the Crisis in Nursing
  • Retention
  • Adequate & Flexible
  • Staffing Protocols
  • Communication/respect/
  • Recognition
  • Competitive Compensation
  • & Flexible Benefits
  • Recruitment
  • Collaborate to Recruit
  • Image
  • Web—disseminate
  • Information
  • Tool Kit Development
  • Education
  • Education Processes
  • Scholarship &
  • Financial Aid
  • Finance & Marketing
  • Mentoring

Solving the

Nursing

Shortage

Commission

  • Workplace Issues
  • Stress in the Workplace
  • Clinical Practice Delivery Models & Quality of Care
  • Regulatory Issues
  • Participate in Decision Making
  • Scheduling & Lifestyle Issues
chair ann possidente vice chair debra b doyle

Recruitment Subcommittee

Chair: Ann Possidente

Vice Chair: Debra B. Doyle

recruitment summit
Recruitment – Summit

1. Poor public and media image

  • Women’s profession
  • What do nurses do?
  • Promoted to middle & high schoolers

as job vs career

recruitment summit21
Recruitment – Summit

2. Hospitals are a business

3. Lack respect as a profession by the

public and among nurses

maryland commission on the crisis in nursing
Maryland Commission on the Crisis in Nursing
  • Project a more positive and

professional image of nursing

  • Attract middle and high school

students into nursing as a career

our charge
Our Charge
  • Develop statewide campaign
  • Promote nursing as worthwhile career
slide24

Who are we

trying to

attract &

retain?

What should

we do?

What is the

competition

doing?

What do these

coworkers

want/value?

the nursing profession s future
The Nursing Profession’s Future

11 Y.O. 21 Y.O. 30 Y.O.

College

1) Non-Nsg

Students

2) Nsg

Students

“Second Career”

1) People desiring

a second career

Nurses

1) Current

Nurses

Middle School

1) Students

2) Parents

High School

  • Expected Outcomes:
  • Understand current perceptions of the nursing profession
  • Attract more students into the nursing profession
recruitment middle high schools participants n 219
Recruitment—Middle/High Schools Participants N = 219

1. Viewed Nursing as technical as opposed to professional (like a “shop”)

2. No Career advancement—58.7%

3. Unsure of “what it takes to become an RN”

  • Educational requirements
  • Differences in 2yr vs. 4yr programs
recruitment middle high schools
Recruitment—Middle/High Schools

4. “Scary” job with life and death decisions

5. Job security

  • Computers and teaching “sure bet”
  • If cut Medicare, hospitals will close 24.1%

6. “Girls” job - 79.9%

recruitment middle high schools28
Recruitment—Middle/High Schools

7. Wearing a uniform—unappealing

8. Unfavorable hours & tasks

(work weekends and holidays)

9. Stressful—watching people die

recruitment subcommittee accomplishments

Recruitment Subcommittee Accomplishments

Nursing Image Videos Resources Library

(www. marylandhealthcareers.org)

Web Site Developed through MHA

(www. marylandhealthcareers.org) & (mbon.org)

Information for parents, teachers, students

Facts about nursing, scholarships

Hyperlinks to other nursing information

recruitment subcommittee accomplishments30

Recruitment Subcommittee Accomplishments

Legislative Shadow Program

Tool kits

(middle and high school students, counselors, teachers and Parents)

Student Volunteer Program

Speakers Bureau

Listening to constituents

recruitment subcommittee accomplishments31
Recruitment Subcommittee Accomplishments
  • Working with
    • Education Subcommittee on the best approach for recruiting faculty
    • Healthcare settings to find clinical rotations
slide32

Recruitment Subcommittee Volunteers

THANKS!

  • Ann Possidente, Chair
  • Mona Bahouth
  • Carolyn G. Baker
  • Susan Battistoni
  • Mary L.Beachley
  • Sharan Lee Bidle
  • Justin Bishop
  • Jean L. Bridle
  • Barbara Marx Brocato
  • Melissa A. Brodeur
  • Trena Brown
  • Linda Brown-Sutphin
  • Kathryn Buffington
  • Ann T. Bures
  • Debra B. Doyle,
  • V.Chair
  • Ann Byrne
  • Martha R. Caputo
  • Amy Chi
  • Virginia R. Clark
  • Harold Cohen
  • Robb Cohen
  • Carol Costante
  • Judith Covich
  • Frances Crites
  • Catherine Crowley
  • Regina M. Curran
  • Parker David
  • Jack Davisdon
  • Mary H. Deeley
  • Lynn M. Derrickson
  • Mae Esh
  • Jeffrey Friedman
  • Susan E. Gibson
  • Robyn Gilden
  • Bruce N. Griffin
  • Dorna P. Hairston
  • Kathryn V. Hall
  • John A. Harris
  • Cheryl Heilman
  • Sharon Hobson
  • Mary Cathryn Hoffman
  • M. Theresa Hommel
  • Kay Hoskinson
slide33

Recruitment Subcommittee Members

THANKS!

  • Montgomery
  • Barbara Luminella
  • Susan Lynott
  • Kim Kathryn

Lothschuetz-

  • McCarron
  • Christina McGann
  • Janet Melson
  • Fran Miller
  • Berta R. Mitchell
  • Donna Mueller
  • Dawn Nally
  • Kathleen N. Neely
  • Jack Neil
  • Matt Neiswanger
  • Lola Null
  • Kathleen Ogle
  • Wayne Howard
  • Cecelia Hughes
  • Lorraine Hughes-Girandola
  • Joan Humlock
  • Emeka Ifemeje
  • Linda Janzik
  • Seth Johnson
  • Stephanie Jourdan
  • Laura L. Katz
  • Kathy Kemper
  • Lisa Lambert
  • Lena Lee
  • Fran Leibfreid
  • Romona Lewis
  • Amy L. Lohfield
  • Lisette K. Osborne
  • Marc Palovitz
  • Yvonne Paraway
  • David Parker
  • Karen M. Parrotte
  • Karen C. Poisker
  • Constance M. Pryor
  • Jennifer B. Rainer
  • Ann Regier
  • Hope Ripkin
  • George Rose
  • Sharon M. Rossi
  • Peter Russell
  • Stephanie L. Sand
  • Pat Saunders
slide34

Recruitment Subcommittee Members

THANKS!

  • Laura Van Syckle
  • Lisa Wade
  • Maureen Wakefield
  • Mary Lou Watson
  • Elizabeth Weglein
  • Carol Wiggins
  • Erica Williams
  • Evelyn S. Wilmer
  • Pat Wilmsen
  • Bonnita D. Wilson
  • Mark Woodard
  • Emmaline T. Woodson
  • Rhonda Wyskiel
  • Gary Yakimov
  • Amy Schaefer
  • Carol Schatzman
  • Mary Schriver
  • Lisa Seldomridge
  • Lynn Z. Sklar
  • Jeanne Smoot
  • Karen Sullivan
  • Vicki L. Taliaferro
  • Marion Taylor
  • Lisa Tenney
  • Lana Thomas
  • Tammy J. Thompson
  • Mary R. Towe
  • Denise Tucker
  • David Uhlfelder
recruitment subcommittee
Recruitment Subcommittee
  • Get involved
  • We welcome additional volunteers
  • Access the Maryland Board of Nursing

(mbon.org)

workplace issues subcommittee

Workplace Issues Subcommittee

Chair: Donna Wilhelm

Vice Chair: Maria Koszalka

workplace issues subcommittee members
Micaela, M Aigner-Jacobs

Nancy Allen

Loretta Beckman

Stephanie Bernard

Susan D. Boettger

Judith E. Breitenbach

Jean L. Bridle

Melissa A. Brodeur

Deneen brown

Angela T. Burden

Ann Byrne

Rosalyn G. Carter

Filissa M. Caserta

Phyllis Cassidy

April C. Chase

Nalini Cherian

Deborah L. Chesser

Virginia R. Clark

Janet Cogliano

Robb Cohen

Harold Cohen

Stacey M. Cook

Catherine Crowley

Regina M. Curran

Carol A. Curran

Workplace Issues Subcommittee Members

Christin McGann

Kate McPhaul

Judith Meyers

Barbara Anne Miklewski

Linda A. Miles

Sharon Millar

Linda Miller

Berta Z. Mitchell

Harriett Moore

Toni Moore-Duggan

Dawn Nally

Moira Namuth

Sandra Natolly

Victoria B. Navarro

Kathleen N. Neely

Jack Neil

Lois H. Neuman

Robin Purdy Newhouse

Catherine S. Novak

Linda O'Hara

Joann Oliver

Carolyn R. Overcash

Vanessa R. Pierre

Carol Portner

Curtis Price

Donna Damico

Sandra L. Dearholt

Mary H. Deeley

Connie A. Dennis

Mary Dent

Carole Derck

Sarah S. Detmer

Dottie Devine

Sallie Dicus

Elizabeth Ann Evins

Beverly S. Francis

Susan E. Gibson

Beverly B. Goldsmith

Sheila Greenwood

Catherine M. Griswold

Larry L. Grosser

Beverly S. Guy

Kathryn V. Hall

Sharon G, Hameroff

Elise Handelman

Janet Holly Hoppenstein

Ellen L. Horowits

Kay Hoskinson

Belinda D. Houston

Paula A. James

S. Nooshin Javan

Michael Jenifer

Sharon A. Johnson

Seth Johnson

Keith Jones

Judith Karp

Silvie Kassar

Laura L. Katz

Jack C. Keane

Juanita Kennedy

Vicky P. Kent

Kathie Kloch

Maria V. Koszalka

Dina A. Krenzischek

Pamela E. Kumar

Mary J. Larkin

Sandy Levy

Mary A. Linton

Kathryn Lothschuetz-Montgomery

Sandra Lucci

Suzan Lundy

Marsha Marcus W.

Christin McGann

slide38

Workplace Issues Subcommittee Members (cont.)

Mary Zohlen

Barbara Watts

Patricia Watts-Kelley

Beverly A. Wehmer

Donna Wilhelm

Erica Williams

Marisa Wilson

Helen Jane Wobbeking

Heather Yockey

Gloria Zarlenga

Karen Tipton

Cathy Toepfner

Janis Trainor

Denise Tucker

David Uhlfelder

Brenda Vitucci

Maureen Wakefield

Florine Marshel

Constance Sumpter

Sandra Sundeen

Cecile E. Sutherland

Carol Swartz

Tami W. Swearingen

Irene Taylor

Lana Thomas

Tammy J. Thompson

Lynn Z. Sklar

Dianne C. Smith

Lucie Smith

Regina Smith-Yurek

Annette E. Snyder

Joan M. Spear

Denise Stanback

Cathy Stonebraker

Eleanor Walker

Joan Humlock

Delores M. Puno

Donna Raimondi

Ann Rasenberger

Anne E. Rehfegd

Robin H. Reid

Susan Reiman

Tina Roach

George Rose

Arlene Marie Rosen

Stephanie L. Sand

Genene Saxton

Judy J. Schuur

Ernestine Scott

Carol Sheehan

Denise Singleton

Dawn Strecker

Karen Sullivan

workplace issues subcommittee initial charge
Workplace Issues SubcommitteeInitial Charge
  • Identify workplace issues causing nurse dissatisfaction
  • Recommend ways to improve

nurses’ work environments

nurse dissatisfaction issues identified
Nurse Dissatisfaction Issues Identified
  • Scheduling and Life Style
        • Mandatory overtime
        • Flexible scheduling
        • On call
        • Child care/sick child care
        • Reassignment
        • Scheduling
        • Women-friendly issues
        • Age appropriate assignments
nurse dissatisfaction issues identified41
Nurse Dissatisfaction Issues Identified
  • Professional environment
        • Difficulties with delegation
        • Physician collaboration
        • Autonomy
        • Respect
        • Agency nurse accountability/autonomy
        • Skill mix
        • LPN scope of practice
        • Difference in practice settings
nurse dissatisfaction issues identified42
Nurse Dissatisfaction Issues Identified
  • Regulatory
      • Scope of practice for techs, extenders, etc
      • Documentation requirements
      • LPN scope of practice
      • Inconsistent regulation for providers in different settings
nurse dissatisfaction issues identified43
Nurse Dissatisfaction Issues Identified
  • Clinical Practice Delivery Model/ Quality of Care
        • Nurse-patient ratio
        • Quality of care
        • Skill mix
nurse dissatisfaction issues identified44
Nurse Dissatisfaction Issues Identified
  • Stress in the workplace
      • Public expectations
      • Support services
      • Occupational health issues
      • Self-care
      • Injury protection
      • Safety/violence/abuse
workplace issues subcommittee accomplishments
Workplace Issues SubcommitteeAccomplishments

1.Survey validated nurses’ issues & concerns

2. Paper written that identified:

  • Scope of the problems
  • Impact on quality of care
  • Strategies to address identified concerns
workplace issues subcommittee accomplishment
Workplace Issues SubcommitteeAccomplishment

3. Developed Concept Paper to Support Legislation

  • Mandatory overtime
  • Whistleblower protection
  • Nurses participating in organizational policies

4. Impact on Legislation-all legislation passed

  • HB 329 - Healthcare Whistleblower Protection Act
  • SB 537 - Nurses Involuntary Overtime Prohibition
  • HB 590/SB 46 - Study of the Use of Technology to Assist Nurses in Caring for Patients

5. Established Workplace Subgroup to Address

Technology Issues

next steps
Next Steps

1. Address the following topics:

  • Review information obtained from nursing survey to determine which areas of focus

2. Other areas to address are:

  • Stress in the workplace
  • Technology issues- Professional environment
  • Regulations
  • Clinical practice delivery model/quality of care

3. Respond to legislative updates to current legislation

  • HB 329, SB 537, & HB 590/SB 46
maryland board of nursing website http www mbon org for upcoming meeting dates and locations
Maryland Board of Nursing Website (Http://www.mbon.org)

For Upcoming Meeting Dates and Locations

workplace issues subcommittee49

Workplace Issues Subcommittee

Nursing Technology Workgroup

Chairperson: Maria Koszalka

nursing technology workgroup committee members
Maria Koszalka Chairperson

Mary Beachley

Stephen Buckingham

Bycoffe Marcia

Robert Cohen

Ernestine Cosby

Brian Gugerty

Toni Hughes

Terry Herbert

Dina Krenzischek

Janet Marron

Carol Mariglia

Pat Maher

Linda Miller

Sandra Natolly

Susan Newbold

Carol Sheehan

Mary Lou Watson

Marisa Wilson

Nursing Technology WorkgroupCommittee Members
nursing technology workgroup initial charge
Nursing Technology Workgroup Initial Charge
  • HB 590 – Taskforce to Study the Use of Technology to Assist Nurses in Caring for Patients
  • Technological applications MUST:
    • Maximize nursing productivity
    • Increase quality of patient care
    • Improve work environment infrastructure in health care settings
nursing technology workgroup purpose
Nursing Technology WorkgroupPurpose
  • Establish Workplace Issues Taskforce
  • Identify technology driven point of care applications
  • Consultation with technology driven point of care application experts
nursing technology workgroup accomplishments
Nursing Technology WorkgroupAccomplishments

Goal statements developed to support nursing

practice through technology:

  • Systems functional for nurses
  • Maximize nursing time
  • Maximize patient safety
  • Bar coding standardized to support technology
  • Reports allow for data extraction & electronic transferal
  • Programs maximize information sharing via web-based technology
nursing technology workgroup accomplishments goal statements continued
Nursing Technology WorkgroupAccomplishments- Goal Statements( continued)
  • Hard and software adaptable to nursing workflow
  • Nursing staff participate in hardware selection
  • Clinical staff involved in development of clinical data base
  • Acceptance of technology by nurses UAPs by on-the-job training (mandatory competency)
  • Technology competency education supported by administration
  • Basic informatics training occur in nursing education programs
nursing technology workgroup expected outcomes
Nursing Technology WorkgroupExpected Outcomes

How will information be used?

  • Direct policy development
  • Investigate funding for developing specific technology
  • Develop criteria/parameters for selecting technology
  • Healthcare organizations use criteria to select technology
  • Develop resource manual
nursing technology workgroup expected outcomes56
Nursing Technology WorkgroupExpected Outcomes
  • References will be developed to include
    • Criteria for selection of information, clinical, robotics technology
    • Information to determine benefits of integrated versus “best of breed” systems
    • Recommendations for selection of basic technology required to provide safe nursing care
    • Data on technology that support nursing practice
nursing technology workgroup big impact
Nursing Technology Workgroup “Big Impact”
  • Focus: Support nursing practice and enhance

patient safety

    • Provider Order Management
    • Electronic medical record
  • Supported by:
    • Leapfrog organization
    • IOM report
    • Professional nursing organizations
nursing technology workgroup next steps
Representation from

Acute care hospitals

Nurse managers

IS

Staff nurses

Third party payer

MNA

Need representation

LTC

Home care

Ambulatory

Department of Health and Mental Hygiene

IS nurses in clinical setting

Nursing Technology WorkgroupNext Steps
nursing technology workgroup next steps59
Nursing Technology WorkgroupNext Steps
  • Develop:
    • Criteria to evaluate technology

(cost- benefit)

    • Recommendations for basic technology required to provide nursing care
    • List of technology currently used (survey)
retention subcommittee
Retention Subcommittee

Chair: Jeff Jefferies

Vice Chair: Nancy Dianis

we want to thank our volunteers
We want to Thank our Volunteers
  • Ruby Anderson Gloria Barlow Anne Bilderback Bramblee Bird
  • Lorna Branch Jean L. Bridle Audrey Byrd Timothy Carey
  • Amy Chi Pat Cimno Sandy Cohen Robb Cohen
  • Catherine Crowley Regina M. Curran Mary Kay Demarco Sarah S. Detmer
  • Donna M. Dorsey Joyce Emerick Jill L. England Joanne Evans
  • Rebecca Faughander Jane H. Flowers Susan Gibson Kathryn V. Hall
  • DeLois G. Hamilton Elise Handelman Elaine J. Holman Mike Holy
  • Bernice Hughes Jeannette Jefferies Bonita E. Jenkins H. Scott Johnson
  • Susan Kalaine Theresa A. Kapetanovic Jack Keane Eileen Lacijan
  • Diane Liebeskind Dora Long “Ski” Lower Sandra Lucci
  • Florine Marshel Carol Marsiglia Suellyn Masek Christina McGann
  • Judith McMillan Grace McNeal Elaine Mennito Steve Morrison
  • Rosemary Mortimer Donna Mueller Pat Mynarski Kathy Neely
  • Bonnie Neibauer Bette Nunn Bette Carole O’Connor Leigh Pancoast
  • Julia Pannell Karen M. Parrotte Janet Passley-Harp Tina Patrico
  • Anne E. Rehfegd Tina Roach Deborah L. Royalty M. Judith Rudell
  • Vicki Ryan Valerie Shearer Carol Sheehan Leslie R. Simmons
  • Lynn Sklar Dean Smith Dawn Stecker Karen Sullivan
  • Constance Sumpter Cecile E. Sutherland Irene Taylor Mary R. Towe
  • David Uhlfelder Diane Walbridge Jan Watts Elizabeth Whiting
  • Carol Wiggins Donna Wilhelm Mark Woodward
retention subcommittee initial charge
Review data that describes nurse retention issues

Explore compensation as a nurse retainer

Explore aspects of professional development as a nurse retainer

Retention Subcommittee Initial Charge
retention subcommittee recommendations
Retention Subcommittee Recommendations
  • Total Compensation Guiding Principals:
    • Flexible and possibly transferable
    • Reduce salary compression
    • Review of salaries at specified intervals
    • Benefits menu – developed with RN input
    • Benefits reviewed annually
    • Career development plan
    • Non-selected benefits reinvested by RN into – additional educational days, retirement account,etc.
retention subcommittee recommendations65
Retention Subcommittee Recommendations
  • “Holistic” Compensation Models by

Generation

    • 401 (k)
    • Medical Coverage
    • Pension
    • Clear sense of Organizational purpose
    • Compensation that grows with the RN
retention subcommittee recommendations66
Retention Subcommittee Recommendations
  • Career Path Development
    • Within current workplace
    • Across healthcare organizations
  • Coaching/mentoring
  • Work Place Safety
    • Create safe environment
    • Create resources for RN to handle safety issues (threatening behaviors, verbal and physical abuse)
retention subcommittee the next steps
Retention Subcommittee: the Next Steps
  • Create a “product” that represents the compensation package recommendations
  • Written information disseminated to stakeholders
    • Create a “tool kit” to be used for presentations
    • Create materials focused on each stakeholder
    • Hold compensation forums to present information
    • Include total compensation package information in the Commission’s Annual Report
    • Design a “Nurses Compensation Hot-Line” via web or phone that provides nurses with a venue to learn about compensation and to ask questions
retention subcommittee the next steps68
Retention Subcommittee: the Next Steps
  • Develop plans to overcome barriers to a comprehensive compensation plan
  • Develop Career Path options
  • Explore Nursing Care Delivery Systems – to enhance the work environment
  • Encourage participation of RN volunteers to develop these programs
the education subcommittee report

The Education Subcommittee Report

Chair: Patricia Watts-Kelley

Vice Chair: Peggy Soderstrom

the goals of the education subcommittee
The Goals of the Education Subcommittee
  • Facilitate the education of qualified individuals
  • Ensure that pool of qualified, accessible nurses continues to alleviate the existing void
  • Prepare future nurses with the competency based skills to meet the healthcare needs
background
Background
  • Working groups of the Subcommittee
    • Education
    • Financial
    • Mentoring
    • Faculty
background72
Background
  • Working groups of the Subcommittee
    • Education
    • Financial
    • Mentoring
    • Faculty
accomplishments to date
Accomplishments to date
  • Scholarship legislation
    • Financial assistance enhances many students’ ability to finish a nursing program often leading to early entry into the workforce
    • Measuring successful completion outcomes
    • (Scholarships are a crucial factor)
    • Supported an increase in funding of the nursing scholarship to include all eligible students
work priority fall 2001
Work Priority Fall 2001
  • Identify a credible method for determining the number of nurses needed to meet the healthcare needs of Maryland’s citizens
    • Explore an accurate method to measure need related to demand
    • Develop outcome-based recommendations to address the nursing shortage
on going work outcomes
On Going Work-Outcomes
  • Developing a forecasting model
    • A credible method to calculate the number of nurses needed
    • Project the supply and demand/need
  • Analyze trend data
  • Use forecasting model for future educational adjustments
forecasting model
Forecasting Model
  • Estimates the future supply of nurses
    • Forecasts the size, the age and the educational level of the nursing workforce
    • New graduates are added, as well as

in-migration

    • Predicts impact of retirements, deaths and out-migration of experienced nurses
present data collection
Present Data Collection
  • Occupational Projections of RNs, LPNs and nursing faculty
  • Nursing student enrollment

(LPN, AD, BSN, Advanced degrees)

  • Faculty Salaries
    • Preliminary data analysis indicate a widening of the gap between clinical service and faculty salaries
  • 2002 year first time licensure exam takers
    • RN & LPN candidates
monitor evaluate revise
Monitor, Evaluate, Revise
  • What is succeeding?
  • What can be improved upon?
  • What additional issues and areas need to be addressed?
future work
Future Work
  • Diversity (geographic, ethnic, cultural, physiologic, and gender)
  • Questions for future consideration are:
    • What is the extent of the need for a more diverse nursing faculty?
    • How do nursing educators address the needs of diverse students?
slide80
Pamela Ambush

Lynda A.Bartko

Madeliene Becker

Rosemarie O.Berman

Sharon L.Bernier

Teresa Bianco

Barbara Marx Brocato

Trena Brown

Martha R.Caputo

Virginia R.Clark

Mary Clisham

Robb Cohen

Harold Cohen

Frances Crites

Catherine Crowley

Regina M. Curran

Barbara P. Daniel

Mary H. Deeley

Thomas James DeGraba

Rosie Delegrotti

Mary Dent

Carol G. Dignon

Elizabeth Dunne

Eugenie J.Dunnells

Sandra Dunnington

Linda Epstein

Judith Feustle

Jane Garvin

Susan E.Gibson

Bruce N.Griffin

Kathryn V.Hall

Donna Helfferich

Gertrude T.Hodges

Janice Hoffman

Dorothy Holley

Marie T. Holley

Robyn E.Holley

Education Subcommittee Members

Thank YOU

  • Ellen L. Horowits
  • Kay Hoskinson
  • M. Patricia Howard
  • Joan Humlock
  • S. Nooshin Javan
  • Bonita E. Jenkins
  • Beth Jernigan
  • Seth Johnson
  • Kathleen Jones
  • Johnnye S. Jonhson
  • Goar Karami
  • Silvie Kassar
  • Laura L. Katz
  • Barbara H.Kemerer
  • Cynthia E.Kielinen
  • Michael Kiphart
  • Kathryn Lothschuetz-

Montgomery

  • Sandra Lucci
  • Susan Lynott
  • Erin Marek
  • Denise Marshall
  • Joyce B. McAdoo
  • Blanka McClammer
  • Christina McGann
  • Judith McMillan
  • Cheryl McNamara
  • Grace McNeal
  • Earlene B. Merrill
  • Fran Miller
  • Nancy Monahan
  • Toni Moore-Duggan
  • Rosemary E. S. Mortimer
  • Marion Mulholland
  • Robert Murray
  • Dawn Nally
  • Sandra Natolly
thank you members
Kathleen N. Neely

Jack Neil

Ronnie Netteburg

Jean Nichols

Janice Oliver

Kathleen Parsons

Edith Patten

Carol Bryant Payne

Lesley Perry

Nayna Phillipsen

Karen C.Poisker

Barbara C.Poniatowski

Ann Possidente

Constance M. Pryor

Ann Rasenberger

Robin H. Reid

Bernadette Rock

Stephanie L. Sand

Georgeanne C. Santolla

Amy Schaefer

Terri Schreyer

Marge Schueler

Judy J. Schuur

B. Joan Scott

Lisa Seldomridge

Valerie Shearer

Darlene Shoemaker

Dianne C. Smith

Peggy Soderstrom

Karen Sullivan

Sandra Sundeen

Lana Thomas

Tammy J.Thompson

Patricia Travis

Eleanor Walker

Robin Wantz

Thank YOU Members
  • Joan Warren
  • Jan Watts
  • Elizabeth Weathington
  • Anna White
  • Carol Wiggins
  • Erica Williams
  • Karen Wons
please join us
Please Join Us !!!
  • E-mail questions about subcommittee activities
    • swcommission@hotmail.com
  • Check the MBON website for meeting schedules and subcommittee Volunteer Form
    • mbon.org
major focus
Major Focus
  • Education Subcommittee
    • MORE
      • Students
      • Faculty
      • Scholarships
      • Basic Graduates
major focus84
Major Focus
  • Recruitment Subcommittee
    • Collaborate! Collaborate! Collaborate!
      • Youth
      • Help from nurses and nursing students
      • Develop recruitment tools
major focus85
Major Focus
  • Retention Subcommittee
    • Value nurses
    • Respect nurses
    • Take control of career
major focus86
Major Focus
  • Workplace Issues
    • Give nurses their “due”
    • Acknowledge
      • Needs
      • Fears
      • Lifestyle
thanks

Thanks

VOLUNTEERS!