1 / 43

Impact of Tropical Easterly Waves during the North American Monsoon (NAM) using a Mesoscale Model

Impact of Tropical Easterly Waves during the North American Monsoon (NAM) using a Mesoscale Model. Jennifer L. Adams CIMMS/University of Oklahoma Dr. David Stensrud NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory October 27, 2005. What is the NAM?.

twyla
Download Presentation

Impact of Tropical Easterly Waves during the North American Monsoon (NAM) using a Mesoscale Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Impact of Tropical Easterly Waves during the North American Monsoon (NAM) using a Mesoscale Model Jennifer L. Adams CIMMS/University of Oklahoma Dr. David Stensrud NOAA/National Severe Storms Laboratory October 27, 2005

  2. What is the NAM? • Distinct shift in mid-level winds accompanied by an increase in rainfall • Occurs over NW Mexico and SW United States • Onset usually in July and decays in September • Great deal of variability

  3. NAM Moisture Source • Moisture source current consensus • low-level moisture  Gulf of California (GoC) • mid-level moisture  Gulf of Mexico (GoM) • Transport of low-level moisture by gulf surges (one way) • Induced by passage of tropical easterly waves (TEWs) over GoC and/or outflow boundaries/gust fronts

  4. Gulf surges Hales (1972) and Brenner (1974) • Cooler temps, increased dewpoints, pressure rise, southerly wind • Increase in convection • Shallow vertical extent • Loss of definition upon entering desert SW Adams and Comrie (1997)

  5. Motivation • NAM predictability very low • TEWs influential to strength of NAM • Inverse relationship between NAM and U.S. central plains rainfall

  6. Goals • Explore impact of TEWs on the NAM • gulf surges • NAM region rainfall • Control run of MM5 compared to simulation where TEWs are removed

  7. Model Description • Pennsylvania State University/National Center for Atmospheric Research Mesoscale Model (MM5) • Model domain (350x180x23) at 25 km grid spacing Puerto Penasco

  8. MM5 Parameterization Schemes • Kain-Fritsch convective scheme (Kain and Fritsch 1990) • MRF PBL scheme (Hong and Pan 1996) • Simple water and ice microphysics (Dudhia 1989) • Global terrain dataset – 10 minute resolution (25 USGS land use categories) • Rapid Radiative Transfer Model for radiation • 5-layer soil model (Dudhia 1996) • Model initialization: NCEP/NCAR reanalysis data • supply boundary conditions every 6-h • GoC SSTs set to constant 29.0ºC

  9. Methodology • Four one-month periods • July 1990, July 1992, August 1988, August 1986 • ECMWF reanalysis data and CPC precipitation analysis • Varying number of TEWs and rainfall amounts

  10. ECMWF Hövmoller Diagrams (850 mb) July 1990 July 1992 August 1986 August 1988

  11. Methodology • Harmonic analysis to remove TEWs from boundary conditions • Reed et al. (1977) – TEWs average wavelength 2500 km, propagation speed of 8 m/s, and average period of 3.5 days • TEWs with periods of approx. 3.5-7.5 days identified – amplitudes replaced with value of zero south of 30ºN • T, q, u, v, ght, and slp

  12. Harmonics

  13. Harmonic Amplitudes (~40˚W) August 1988 Harmonic E Harmonic E TEW No-TEW

  14. MM5 Hövmoller Diagrams (700 mb) TEW No TEW

  15. Results • 18 surges over 4 months examined • 17 induced by TEW/tropical storm • Varying degrees of strength and frequency

  16. Surge Criteria • Used time-series data at Puerto Penasco, Mexico as a “first pass” to ID surge events • Surges occur when: • winds shift to southerly • maximum daily dewpoint exceeding 65ºF for at least 2 days • peak wind speeds greater than 5 m/s • decrease in daily max temp of greater than 5ºF from the previous day

  17. August 1986 Time-series

  18. August 1986 Time-series

  19. August 1986 Results • 6 surges in the control run • all show up in the time-series data at Puerto Penasco • 5 induced by TEWs and 1 initiated by a tropical storm (Howard?) • 2 TEWs possibly contained in the model initial conditions

  20. TEW passage (18Z Aug 26) No TEW TEW

  21. Pre-surge (18Z Aug 26) TEW No TEW

  22. Surge onset (06Z Aug 27) TEW No TEW

  23. Surge (12Z Aug 28) TEW No TEW

  24. Post-surge (12Z Aug 29) TEW No TEW

  25. Surge summary • TEW passage 12 hours prior to surge onset • Entire GoC shifts to southerly winds • 10 of 18 surges (most common) • Surge virtually absent from no-TEW simulation

  26. TEWs and NAM rainfall • Absence of TEWs has impact on precipitation amounts over the NAM region • Many areas receive more rainfall when TEWs are present • Influences overall extent of NAM precipitation

  27. August 1988 Rainfall Differences (TEW-no TEW)

  28. Central Plains Rainfall Differences (TEW-no TEW) August 1988

  29. Meridional Moisture Flux

  30. Rainfall Differences (00Z Aug 17-06Z Aug 23) August 1988

  31. Rainfall Differences -- 12Z Aug 19 - 00Z Aug 25 August 1986

  32. Meridional Moisture Flux

  33. Precipitable Water

  34. Mid-latitude forcing -- 12Z Aug 20, 1986 TEW No TEW

  35. Adding TEWs • July 1992 --> weak monsoon season July 1990 --> strong monsoon season • Removed waves from July 1992 boundary conditions • Inserted July 1990 TEWs into July 1992 boundary conditions

  36. MM5 Hövmoller Diagrams Hybrid July 1992

  37. 12Z July 19 Hybrid run TEW passage

  38. Surge (00Z July 20) Hybrid July 1992

  39. Hybrid - July 1992 TEW Run

  40. Conclusions • Harmonic analysis successfully removes TEWs from the model boundary conditions • MM5 reproduces surges over the GoC • full gulf, partial gulf, and SMO • NAM shows great deal of interannual variability • Surges impacted by absence of TEWs

  41. Conclusions • Reduction of surge events in the no-TEW run reduced rainfall amounts over the NAM region • Absence of TEWs increases precipitation over the central United States • CAPE • mid-latitude forcing • Adding waves enhances NAM • more distinct surge events • increase in rainfall over core monsoon region

  42. Harmonic Analysis • Since the model data used to create the boundary conditions are equally spaced in time and contain no missing values, the model data can be represented exactly as a series of n points in time by summing a series of n/2 harmonic functions….

More Related