1 / 23

Transmit Diversity Scheme for TDS-OFDM Systems with Reduced Complexity

Transmit Diversity Scheme for TDS-OFDM Systems with Reduced Complexity. Linglong Dai, Zhaocheng Wang, Jintao Wang, and Jun Wang Tsinghua University, Beijing, China. Contents. 1. Background. 2. Transmit Diversity in TDS-OFDM. 3. Simulation Results. 4. Conclusion. Transmit Diversity.

twhitfield
Download Presentation

Transmit Diversity Scheme for TDS-OFDM Systems with Reduced Complexity

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Transmit Diversity Scheme for TDS-OFDM Systems with Reduced Complexity Linglong Dai, Zhaocheng Wang, Jintao Wang, and Jun Wang Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

  2. Contents 1 Background 2 Transmit Diversity in TDS-OFDM 3 Simulation Results 4 Conclusion

  3. Transmit Diversity • Space Diversity[1] • Reliable transmission over wireless fading channels • Without bandwidth or power penalty • Transmit Diversity • More attractive for broadcasting systems • Lower overallhardware complexity • Transmit Diversity in DVB-T2 [2]

  4. About TDS-OFDM • TDS-OFDM (Time domain synchronous OFDM )[3] • Key technology of the Chinese digital television terrestrial broadcasting standard • Transmit diversity has not been specified • Key feature: PN sequence instead of cyclic prefix (CP)

  5. Transmit Diversity for TDS-OFDM • Transmit Diversity for TDS-OFDM • Space-time block coding (STBC) Based [4] • Space-time-frequency block coding (STFBC) based [5] • Channel Estimation in MIMO-OFDM Two main assumptions: • Ideal channel estimation • Ideal cyclicity reconstruction of the received IDFT block Problem • Not applicable for TDS-OFDM without pilots 5

  6. Transmit Diversity for TDS-OFDM • Channel Estimation for TDS-OFDM Transmit Diversity • Space-time (ST) coded PN sequence [6] • Hypothesis of static channels along consecutive two signal frames • Suitable for deeply frequency-selective but slow fading channels • Space-frequency (SF) coded training sequence (TS) [7] • Assumption of constant channel over adjacent two subcarriers • Suitable for fast time-varying but weakly frequency-selective channels Problem: • How about the doubly selective channel ? Failed ! 6

  7. Contents 1 Background 2 Transmit Diversity in TDS-OFDM 3 Simulation Results 4 Conclusion 7

  8. Space ShiftedCAZAC Sequences • CAZAC (constant amplitude zero autocorrelation ) Sequence • Constant amplitude both in the time and frequency domains [9] • Perfect autocorrelation • Space Shifted CAZAC Sequences for Different Transmit Antennas

  9. CAZAC Based Frame Structure • Proposed two flexible frame structures • Type 1: Same postfix based frame structure (SPFS) • Type 2: Alternate postfix based frame structure (APFS) 9

  10. Transmit Diversity for TDS-OFDM Received IDFT block Transmitted Signal channel AWGN 10

  11. Receiver Design: Channel Estimation • CAZAC-Based Channel Estimation • Received CAZAC sequence • Circular correlation between one local sequence with • The CIR estimates and can be directly extracted • Performance is SNR

  12. Receiver Design: Channel Estimation • Linear interpolation over fast fading channels • The subfreme number M should be small over fast fading channels • e.g., M = 8 for slow fading channels • e.g., M = 2 for very fast fading channels • The tradeoff between spectral efficiency and performance jth superframe (j+1)th superframe mth subframe 12

  13. Receiver Design: CyclicityReconstruction e.g., SPFS

  14. Performance Analysis • Spectral Efficiency Higher than conventional schemes when M>3 2.88% SPFS and APFS have similar efficiency, SPFS is preferred due to its flexibility (N=3780,K=256, M=2) • Computational Complexity 7.20% of the ST coded PN based solution [6], and 6.71% of the SF coded TS based scheme [7] 14

  15. Contents 1 Background 2 Transmit Diversity in TDS-OFDM 3 Simulation Results 4 Conclusion 15

  16. Simulation Results (1) Parameters: • Central Frequency 770 MHz • Signal Bandwidth 7.56 MHz • Transmit Antennas Tx=2 • Modulation QPSK • Length N=3780 K=256 M=2 • Channels Brazil E [10] Vehicular B [11] • Receiver velocity 28/140 km/h SPFS vs. APFS over Brazil E Channel SPFSand APFS have very closeperformances 16

  17. Simulation Results (2) Brazil E (weekly frequency-selective) channel, 140 km/h The proposed scheme has the best performance

  18. Simulation Results (3) Vehicular B (deeply frequency-selective) channel, 140 km/h • The SF coded TS based solution [7] can not work • The proposed scheme has the best performance • The cost is the reduced spectral efficiency of 2.55% 18

  19. Contents 1 Background 2 Transmit Diversity in TDS-OFDM 3 Simulation Results 4 Conclusion 19

  20. Brief Conclusions • A simple transmit diversity scheme is proposed for TDS-OFDM systems with reduced complexity; • The space shifted CAZAC sequence is proposed for channel estimation; • Two types of flexible frame structures called SPFS and APFS are proposed to reconstruct the cyclicity of the received IDFT block without prior channel information; • The receiver complexity: less than 10% • The better BER performance over the doubly selective channels can be achieved at the cost of the small loss in spectral efficiency.

  21. References M. Alamouti, “A simple transmit diversity technique for wireless communications,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 1451–1458, Oct. 1998. Frame Structure, Channel Coding and Modulation for a Second Generation Digital Terrestrial Television Broadcasting System (DVB-T2). European Standard, ETSI EN 302 755, V1.1.1, Sep. 2009. J. Fu, J. Wang, J. Song, C. Pan, and Z. Yang, “A simplified equalization method for dual PN-sequence adding TDS-OFDM systems,” IEEE Trans. Broadcast., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 825–830, Dec. 2008. J. Wang, J. Song, J. Wang, C. Pan, Z. Yang and L. Yang, “A general SFN structure with transmit diversity for TDS-OFDM system,” IEEE Trans. Broadcast., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 245–251, Jan. 2006. J. Wang, Z. Yang, C. Pan, J. Song and L. Yang, “Design of space-time-frequency transmitter diversity scheme for TDS-OFDM system,” IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 759–764, Aug. 2005. F. Yang, K. Peng, J. Wang, J. Song, and Z. Yang, “Training sequence design for low complexity channel estimation in transmit diversity TDSOFDM system,” IEICE Trans. Commun., vol. E92-B, no. 6, pp. 2308–2311, Jun. 2009. F. Yang, K. Peng, J. Wang, J. Song, and Z. Yang, “Channel estimation based on space-time-frequency coded training sequence for transmit diversity system,” IEICE Trans. Commun., vol. E92-B, no. 5, pp. 1901–1903, May 2009. B. Muquet, Z. Wang, and G. B. Giannakis, “Cyclic prefixing or zero padding for wireless multicarrier transmissions?” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 2136–2148, Dec. 2002. L. Boemer and M. Antweiler, “Perfect N-phase sequences and arrays,” IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 782–789, May 1992. Guidelines and Techniques for the Evaluation of DTTB Systems. ITU-R Document 6E/TEMP/131-E, 2003. Guideline for Evaluation of Radio Transmission Technology for IMT-2000. Recommendation ITU-R M.1225, 1997. 21

  22. ありがとう Thank you for your suggestions !

  23. Appendix: APFS 23

More Related