1 / 22

Greening Processed Food Chains, Country Case Study – Sri Lanka

Greening Processed Food Chains, Country Case Study – Sri Lanka. D.A.N. Dharmasena. Status of Food processing industry in Sri Lanka. Out of 6222 industries listed, 247 (4%) are Food Processing Industries ( CEA, 2012 ) Main food processing Industries in the country

twasson
Download Presentation

Greening Processed Food Chains, Country Case Study – Sri Lanka

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Greening Processed Food Chains, Country Case Study – Sri Lanka D.A.N. Dharmasena

  2. Status of Food processing industry in Sri Lanka • Out of 6222 industries listed, 247 (4%) are Food Processing Industries (CEA, 2012) • Main food processing Industries in the country • Rice and rice based foods (rice, Flake, Noodles, rice flour) • Dairy processing • Meat processing (Chicken & Pork) • Bakery and biscuit products • Fresh Fruit and vegetables & processed Fruit & Vegies • Beverages • Nut based products: Cashew & Coconuts • Fish processing industries ( Dried fish & Fresh for export) • Breweries

  3. Imported food products • If imported - food chain limits to transportation packaging distribution. • Eg: • Milk products ( 70 % of the national need) • Meat and fish (Canned fish) • fruit juices • Tomato sauce & ketchup

  4. Current status of environmental impact from food processing industries 1.Rice production & Processing • 70% of people consumes parboiled rice • Paddy soaking effluent -high BOD (950-1300 mg/L) and COD (3540mg/L) (Senanayake et al., 2001) • Carbon foot print for rice production 5566.8 kg CO2/ha/yr (0.7/kg) (Awanthi and Navarathne, 2010)

  5. 2. Coconut processing industry • Desiccated Coconut (DC) industry produce solid and liquid waste • Furnace produce CO2 - the flue gas • Wastewater : BOD: 2118-9569 mg/L Allowable limit 30 respectively (Abeygunawardane, n.d.) • Recently developed a virgin coconut oil recovery system from effluent & waste coconut-water based beverages and vinegar production • Research data are hardly found on carbon foot prints related to coconut processing

  6. SME’s in Sri Lanka • 91% of companies in Sri Lanka are SMEs (world bank, 2011) • SMEs generate more than70 % GDP • Food & Beverage sector contributes about 10% of the GDP • The cost of production in food industry is increasing due to increasing cost of material, labour, energy and water. • Legal actions on Envt. Pollution on SME’s is a big issue!!

  7. Issues need to be addressed on sustainability of food processing in SME’s • Inefficient usage of natural resources , raw materials, energy and water. (RESOURCE EFFICIENCY?) • Promotion of best practices of sustainable consumption and production • Non-compliance with International food safety standards.(HACCP, ISO 22000) • Practical difficulties in successful implementation of  sustainable policies in Sri Lanka.

  8. Example case for SME issues: Rice milling industry – The largest in the country • >70% are SMEs, treating wastewater increases the COP in SME sector – cannot run their business • Technological advancements are needed to support SMEs! • Large-scale operators work on the concept of zero waste: • Thermal electricity from husk – no electricity cost, White ash for cement • Thermal power from solar energy and paddy husk • Biogas plants from effluent • Rice bran – bread making, animal feed, oil • Broken rice: flour & many other products

  9. Rice Processing Small-Scale Large-scale

  10. Initiatives taken by the different stakeholders to minimize environmental impact Sri Lanka’s contribution to global CO2 emission from fossil fuel 0.04% & Per capita – (0.65 t -2007) 0.2t -2012 • Most important policy measures taken to mitigate GHG emission • National environmental action plan (1998-2001) • Establishment of a National Council for Sustainable Devt. – Directly under the President of Sri Lanka • Haritha Lanka Action Plan (targeting up to 2013) (Ranasinghe, 2010) Air quality improvement + Annual Smoke test for vehicles

  11. In the service sector, • Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEEDS) • Greening Sri Lankan Hotels programme (Envt & Tourism) • Establishment of Sustainable Energy Authority (2007) “The energy sector plans -10% renewable energy by 2015” • In the Industrial sector, • Cleaner production & RECP – (NCPC & Universities) • Green building concept –Green rating – just started • Voluntary standards (eg- ISO 14001certification) • Establishment of National Green Reporting System -(Ministry of environment, 2011)

  12. ‘National Green Reporting System’ - Screening committee (18 government, semi government, Statutory bodies) include: • Central Environment Authority (CEA)- Main regulatory body on environment issues • Sri Lankan Standards Institute (SLSI) • Industrial Technology Institute (ITI) • National Cleaner Production Centre (NCPC) • Industrial Development Board (IDB) • Export Development Board

  13. The switch Asia programme, under the Ministry of Technology & Research - to reduce carbon foot prints ofIT, Ceramics and Organizations but no influence on the SMEs in the food sector Pressurizing Groups: • About 700 NGOs work on environmental issues • The few private TV channels; Sirasa, Derana, Swarnavahini, TNL and their FM radio channels • Community based societies

  14. Salient issues and challenges in promoting greening the supply chain in processed food industry • Less attention on environmental issues in food processing Industry • Why? • Low profit margin • Therefore, frequently change the company ownership • Mitigation of environmental issues is an additional burden to the Industry • The export oriented industries are self motivated to maintain local environmental certifications (EPL) and additional environmental management certifications like ISO 14001

  15. Solutions • Change mindset: creating the awareness and interest on the benefits of greening food chains through Resource Efficient Cleaner Production (RECP) • The government agencies could provide affordable financial facilities for the SMEs to implement greening strategies

  16. Success story: OGM Food Product (pvt) Ltd (SME) Daily production: 3000kg rice flour Workforce: 10 Location: very close to a small town Problem:CEA rejected their EP license Due to Envt. Pollution complains: 1. Wastewater 2. Noise 3. Air pollution (Dust) A PG Student conducted a CP audit to assist them getting the EPL – Successful after greening! – Back to EPL! After a mass balance & Energy audit, greening was done

  17. Issues identified & modifications done • 10kg of rice dust washed off with wastewater per day – added a pre-settling tank • Rice flour wastage due to carelessness of workers & using an inappropriate sieving machine – rewarding system, new machine(*) • Thermal inefficiency of flour roasting process using coconut shell as the fuel -stove improvement • The very high electrical power consumption of the inappropriate flour sieving machine -new machine (*) • Very high noise from sieving machine – Disappeared with new machine (*) • Very high dust loading in the area from the sieving machine - Disappeared with new machine (*)

  18. Achievements • Waste Water quality improvement • Ambient Air Quality improvement • Reduction of noise • Reduction of CO2 emissions • Increase of profits

  19. Table 1: Wastewater Analysis Report

  20. Table 2 :Ambient air quality in the end

  21. Outcome at a glance • Annual rice flour wastage prevented: 6405 kg –Rs. 586,000.00 (9351 kg CO2e) • Annual coconut shell fuel wastage prevented: 2460 kg –Rs. 16,000 (4674 kg CO2e) • Annual electricity wastage prevented: 6751 kWh – Rs. 80,132.00 (9273kg CO2e) • Total GHG emission reduced: 23.3 t CO2e/year • Approximate total money saved: 5259 $/year

  22. What else you can imagine? Thank you

More Related