Bias in indexing languages : theoretical approaches on feminine issues. Suellen Oliveira MILANI - São Paulo State University - UNESP (BRAZIL) José Augusto Chaves GUIMARÃES - São Paulo State University - UNESP (BRAZIL). Sponsors:. Research background. Main project:
theoretical approaches on feminine issues
Suellen Oliveira MILANI- São Paulo State University - UNESP (BRAZIL)
José Augusto Chaves GUIMARÃES- São Paulo State University - UNESP (BRAZIL)
To analyze how dialogical are the current theoretical approaches on bias in feminine issues in order to contribute for a preliminary systematization of them.
1. The non-neutral nature of knowledge representation (KR)
2. The three dimensions of KR
3. The question of bias in KR
4. Bias in KR: the universe of feminine studies
In other words...
Methodologies should be developed aiming at not only avoiding bias but also at detecting it in knowledge representation, once the unavoidable subjective influence of the information professional makes it impossible to be a neutral process.
Bias can be conceived as “[…] a negatively loaded word, as something to be avoided or minimized” (Hjørland, 2008, p. 256)
Bias can be observed in KR usually related to gender, sexuality, race, age, ability, ethnicity, language and religion matters, and act as limits to the representation of diversity and to effective library service for diverse populations (Olson, 2002, p. 7).
Bias in KR can act as real obstacles to:
cultural warrant in SKOS (Beghtol, 2002, 2005)
and, as a consequence
to a transcultural ethics of meditaion(García Gutierrez, 2002).
Bias in KR, besides violating individual rights, also inhibits the users, pushing them aside, due to a lack of reliability and even to an identity problem towards the representation criteria.
The inclusion of minority groups in accordance to its condition, be it ethnical, linguistic, political, religious, national, ideological, social or economic condition, emphasizes the need of adequacy (place, society, user and moment), of up-to-dating and of defining the elaboration criteria (Caro Castro & San Segundo Manuel, 1999).
It is necessary to think of an ideal model of knowledge organization for each domain (López-Huertas, Torres, Barité, 2004), once different domains in different cultures have specific informational needs and require different kinds of organization and different ways to get information (Beghtol, 2002).
The limits of the system (and consequently its inclusions and exclusions) are defined by the selection of concepts to be named and “the selection of terms of these concepts often introduces blatant biasses or, more commonly, subtle, insidious marginalizations.” (Olson, 2002)
The degree of terminological precision can be a reliable indicator of the level of development of this theme in different cultures. (López-Huertas & Torres Ramírez, 2005)
Mapping the problems
Gender subject representation is mostly related to sexuality (specially to homosexuality), family life (including maternity) and personal relations.
Women treated as exceptions to masculine norms (Olson, 2002)
Women issues treated isolated, separated from knowledge as a whole (Olson, 2002)
Women issues omitted. (Olson, 2002)
General terms in the masculine form (as well as masculine terms in the plural form to refer to both men and women) (López-Huertas & Torres Ramírez, 2005)
Woman as the subject of anticonception (López-Huertas & Torres Ramírez, 2005)
Nominals as a tendency to create feminine descriptors and to omit their correspondent masculine descriptors. (López-Huertas & Torres Ramírez, 2005)
Rare presence of women in traditional indexing languages, mainly due to the use of masculine as universals (Rodríguez Bravo, 2007)
Rare presence of women in traditional indexing languages due to the fact that the “knowledge representation discourse have maintained feminine sexist stereotypes, presenting an anacronic image of women.” (Rodríguez Bravo, 2007)
some contributions for a preliminary checklist
In what other subject contexts than sexuality, family life and personal relations are feminine issues considered?
Are femine issues are considered in equal basis or as exceptions to masculine ones? Is there a well-ballanced approach of both feminine and masculine forms for the different subjects?
Are there feminine issues omitted?
Are masculine forms used as universals? If it happens, it is importante to differentiate linguistic and idiossincratic reasons.
Are feminine issues treated isolated, separated from knowledge as a whole? Is there a tendency to create feminine descriptors and to omit their correspondent masculine descriptors?
Are there evidences that feminine sexist stereotypes, presenting an anacronic image of womenhave been maintained?
On the process of creating a indexing language to base studies on women, one has to take into account how to represent the masculine.
There is a tendency to avoid descriptors which use the word woman/women as the nuclear element.
Once an information system reveals a type of articulation of a certain domain, special attention should be given to resources such as authorized/non-authorized descriptors/subject headings (USE, UF, see), related terms (RT, see also) and scope notes (SN), because they transcend the technical dimension and play an important social role. (Milani et al., 2009)
Since KR, as an activity which aims at making information available to all and any kind of user, it must ensure that every user, without distinction, is able to recognize himself/herself represented in the system. If this does not occur, the system will have failed; the system will not have fulfilled the expectations of the user; it will have violated the user´s rights and moral values, pushing him/her aside.
As a consequence, bestowing a naming to information is a quite complex representation knowledge activity since the act of subject labeling leads to creating an identity (Olson, 2002)
Information professionals should consider- and be careful with -their effective “power to name” (Olson, 2002) when they decide what to represent and what to leave unnamed, because a broad and deep set of moral values (as well as problems derived from their negation) are effectively (and sometimes dangerously!) involved (Guimarães et al., 2008).
In a society which intends to be politically correct and socially inclusive, attitudes towards stigmas should be modified, and indexing languages, taken as tools of knowledge representation, is a fertile field for it.
Beghtol, C., 2002, A proposed ethical warrant for global knowledge representation and organization systems, Journal of Documentation, 58, n. 5, p. 507-532.
Caro Castro, C., San Segundo Manuel, R., 1999, Lenguajes documentales y exclusión social, in La representación y la organización del conocimiento en sus distintas perspectivas: su influencia en la recuperación de la información: proc. III Congreso ISKO-España,Granada, 22-24 Abril 1999, eds. María José López-Huertas, Juan Carlos Fernández-Molina, Universidad de Granada, Granada, p. 101-108.
Guimarães, J. A. C., 2000, O profissional da informação sob o prisma de sua formação, in Profissionais da Informação: formação, perfil e atuação profissional, ed. M. L. P. Valentim, Polis, São Paulo, 2000, p. 53-70.
Guimarães, J. A. C., 2006, Aspectos éticos em organização e representação do conhecimento (ORC): uma reflexão preliminar, in Políticas de memória e informação: reflexos na organização do conhecimento, eds. M. N. González de Gómez, E. G. D. Orrico, EDUFRN, Natal, 2006, p. 237-264.
Guimaraes, J. A. C. ; Liberatore. Panorama del análisis documental de contenido en el cono sur americano. In: Nogales, T.; Caridad, M. (Org.). La información en la posmodernidad: la sociedad del conocimiento en España e Iberoamerica. Madrid: Ramón Arcedes, 2004, v. , p. 129-141.
Guimarães, J. A. C., Fernández-Molina, J. C., Pinho, F. A., Milani, S. O., 2008, Ethics in the Knowledge Organization Environment: An Overview of Values and Problems in the LIS literature, in Culture and Identity in Knowledge Organization: proc. of the Tenth International ISKO Conference, Montréal, 5-8 August 2008, eds. Clément Arsenault, Joseph T. Tennis, Ergon Verlag, Würzburg, p. 361-366.
López-Huertas, M. J., 2008, Cultural impact on Knowledge Representation and Organization in a Subject Domain, in Arsenault, C.; Tennis, J.T. (ed.). Cultural and Identity in knowledge organization. Würzburg; Ergon. p. 340-346.
López-Huertas, M. J., Barité Roqueta, M. -G., 2002, Knowledge representation and organization of gender studies on the Internet: towards integration, in Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Organization for the 21st Century. Integration of Knowledge across Boundaries: proc. Seventh International ISKO Conference, Granada, 10-13 July 2002, ed. María José López-Huertas, Ergon, Würzburg, p. 393-403.
López-Huertas, M. J., Torres Ramírez, I., Barité, M., 2004, Terminological representation of specialized areas in conceptual structures: the case of gender studies, in Knowledge Organization and the Global Information Society: proc. Eighth International ISKO Conference, London, 13-16 July 2004, ed. Ia C. McIlwaine, Ergon Verlag, Würzburg, p. 35-39.
López-Huertas Pérez, M. J., Torres Ramírez, I. de., 2005, Terminología de género. Sesgos, interrogantes, posibles respuestas, Datagramazero: Revista de Ciência da Informação, 6, n. 5.
Milani, S. O., Guimarães, J. A. C., Pinho, F. A., Fernández-Molina, J. C., 2009, Os desvios na representação do conhecimento em um contexto multicultural: abordagens teóricas, in Nuevas perspectivas para la difusión y organización del conocimiento: proc. IX Congreso ISKO-España,Valencia, 11-13 Marzo 2009, ed. Nuria Lloret Romero, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia, p. 180-190.
Morán Suárez, M. A., Rodríguez Bravo, B., 2001, La imagen de la mujer en la clasificación decimal universal (CDU), in La representación y Organización del Conocimiento: metodologías, modelos e aplicaciones: proc. IV Congreso ISKO-España, Alcalá de Henares, 25-27 Abril 2001, ed. A. Extremeño Placer, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares.
Olson, H.A. (2007). How We Construct Subjects: A Feminist Analysis. Special issue on: Gender Issues in Information Needs and Services, eds. Cindy Ingold and Susan E. Searing. Library Trends 56(2): 509-541.
Olson, H.A.; Gold Smith, S. (2006). Transgressive Tools: the Liberating Power of Classification and Its Potential in Activist Visual Representation. Women and Environment International Magazine,72/73 (fall/winter): 38-40.
Olson, H.A. (2000). Difference, culture, and change: The untapped potential of LCSH. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly 29(1/2); special issue The LCSH Century: One Hundred Years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings.
Olson, H.A. (1998). Mapping beyond Dewey's boundaries: Constructing classificatory space for
marginalized knowledge domains. In Geoffrey C. Bowker and Susan Leigh Star, eds., How
Classifications Work: Problems and Challenges in an Electronic Age, a special issue of Library Trends 47(2): 233-254.
Olson, H.A. (1998). Education for cataloguing is/as women's studies. Serials Librarian 35(1/2): 153–166.
Olson, H.A. (1997). The feminist and the emperor's new clothes: Feminist deconstruction as a critical methodology for library and information studies. Library & Information Science Research 19(2): 181–198
Rodríguez Bravo, B., 2007, La integración de la mujer en los lenguajes documentales: una utopia necesaria en la sociedad del conocimiento, BiD: textos universitaris de biblioteconomia i documentació, n. 18,
Santos, T. M., Madina, A. M., Serra, R. S., 1999, CDU: perspectiva de género y discriminación de minorías, in Organización del conocimiento en sistemas de información: proc. III Congreso ISKO-España,Granada, 22-24 Abril 1999, ed. Francisco Javier García Marco, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, p. 103-118.
Vieira Junior, N. C., 2005, Uso de informação como forma de amenizar os preconceitos acerca da homossexualidade, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, 2005.