Comments on decentralization inequality and poverty relief in china by li tao and yang
1 / 23

Comments on Decentralization, Inequality and Poverty Relief in China by Li, Tao, and Yang - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Comments on Decentralization, Inequality and Poverty Relief in China by Li, Tao, and Yang. Xiaobo Zhang Peking University and IFPRI. Extremely Important Topic. Rising inequality is a top concern.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Comments on Decentralization, Inequality and Poverty Relief in China by Li, Tao, and Yang' - trinh

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Comments on decentralization inequality and poverty relief in china by li tao and yang

Comments onDecentralization, Inequality and Poverty Relief in Chinaby Li, Tao, and Yang

Xiaobo Zhang

Peking University and IFPRI

Extremely important topic
Extremely Important Topic

  • Rising inequality is a top concern.

  • Decentralization is a defining feature of Chinese economy. It has shaped China’s growth and income distributional patterns.

  • This paper makes a contribution to understanding the impact of decentralization on rural-urban income gap.

China s fiscal structure
China’s Fiscal Structure

  • Fiscal decentralization

    Expenditures tie more closely to revenue

  • Horizontally, inter-judiciary competition.

Page 3

China s political structure
China’s Political Structure

  • Organizational form.

    • Replicate, vertical hierarchical structure

    • Irrelevant of economic size and local needs.

  • Strong central mandates.

    • Family planning

    • Social stability and occupational safety (no major accidents)

    • Other central tasks

Page 4

Hierarchical structure
Hierarchical Structure







Page 5

Uneven fiscal dependent burden
Uneven Fiscal Dependent Burden

Zhang, JCE (2006)

Page 7

Regressive tax rate
Regressive Tax Rate

Page 8

Zhang, JCE (2006)

Two spirals
Two Spirals

  • Tax burdens are extremely high in poor regions with agriculture as the major means of production.

    • Downward spiral: small tax base, more extraction from limited agricultural surplus and nonfarm activities, worsening investing environment, and lowering public goods provision.

  • They are low in developed regions initially with a large nonfarm sector.

    • Virtuous cycle: light tax burden for each enterprise, more public inputs, better investing environment.

Page 9

Coastal region race to the bottom
Coastal Region: Race to the “Bottom”

  • Less tax on capital

  • Small governments and better investment environment,

  • but sometime under provision of public goods (such as crime problem)

Page 10

Poor region race to the top
Poor Region: Race to the “Top”

  • Big government and predatory investment environment.

  • Devote most energy to obtain transfers from the upper level government.

  • Keep the “poverty county” status partly by underreporting income. This is probably why in the poverty regressions, transfer is always negative for rural income (a key finding of the paper).

Page 11

Decentralization and overall regional inequality
Decentralization and Overall Regional Inequality

Page 12

Fan, Kanbur, and Zhang, RDF (2011)

Tax sharing rate and rural urban income ratio
Tax Sharing Rate and Rural-Urban Income Ratio

Drawn based on Tables 1 and 2 of Li, Tao, and Yang (2013)

Page 13

Heavy industry led development strategy and rural urban inequality
Heavy-Industry-led Development Strategy and Rural-Urban Inequality

Fan, Kanbur, and Zhang (2012)

Page 14

Problem of using rural urban gap in regressions
Problem of using Rural-Urban Gap in Regressions

  • Local rural-urban income gap is not equal to national rural-urban inequality.

    • It doesn’t take the within-rural and within-urban inequality in a prefecture into account;

    • Cross-regional migration is not accounted.

An example
An Example


An example1
An Example


Alternative method regression based decomposition
Alternative method: regression-based decomposition

  • Suppose y is income per capita (each region has two observations, one for rural and one for urban):

Alternative method regression based decomposition1
Alternative method: regression-based decomposition

Zhang and Zhang (2003)

Mapping findings to policy options
Mapping Findings to Policy Options

  • “It is necessary to introduce local accountability from the bottom up, through both democratic elections and information transparency.”

  • Election is just one way to hold local officials accountable.

Challenges of promoting local democracy
Challenges of Promoting Local Democracy

  • Both political and economic decentralization may jeopardize national unity.

  • Local elite capture/ clientelismcan become a problem (See Mu and Zhang, JDE forthcoming).

Indigenous reforms on the ground
Indigenous Reforms on the Ground

  • Cut the prefecture-level government (Hubei);

  • Merge townships;

  • Borrow police officers from regions.

  • Pairwise-aid (from rich to poor province) strategy (Sichuan and Xinjiang)

Other suggestions
Other Suggestions

  • For the poverty part, it is better to use outcome variable from census, agricultural census, or economic census, which are less manipulated by local officials.

  • Split the paper into two papers.

  • Take logs for economic and population variables.