digital ethics there s no app for that yet n.
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
Digital Ethics: There’s No App for That (Yet!) PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
Digital Ethics: There’s No App for That (Yet!)

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 30

Digital Ethics: There’s No App for That (Yet!) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

  • Uploaded on

Digital Ethics: There’s No App for That (Yet!) . Fred Provenzano, Ph.D., NCSP Private Practice, Seattle, WA Teaching Associate, University of Washington. Workshop Objectives. Recognize the importance of sound professional judgment.

I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
Download Presentation

Digital Ethics: There’s No App for That (Yet!)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
digital ethics there s no app for that yet
Digital Ethics: There’s No App for That (Yet!)

Fred Provenzano, Ph.D., NCSP

Private Practice, Seattle, WA

Teaching Associate, University of Washington

workshop objectives
Workshop Objectives
  • Recognize the importance of sound professional judgment.
  • Become familiar with a comprehensive ethical decision-making model.
workshop objectives continued
Workshop Objectives, continued

Increase knowledge of ethical considerations related to electronic storage & transmission of confidential data.

Appreciate benefits and risks related to digital communications.

professional ethics v
Professional Ethics, v…..
  • Employer Codes of Conduct
  • Licensing and Certification Law
  • State and Federal Case and Statute Law
laws v ethical codes
Laws v. Ethical Codes


  • Typically specifies clearly what you can and cannot do.
  • That which it does not specifically prohibit or require, it does not restrict.
  • Innocent until proven guilty.
laws v ethical codes continued
Laws v. Ethical Codes, continued

Ethical Standards:

  • Often more general, vague.
  • Typically expect/require professional judgment.
  • Often burden of proof on professionals, to show that their behavior was appropriate.
ethical legal decision making model
Ethical & Legal Decision Making Model
  • Describe the parameters of the situation.
  • Define the potential ethical-legal issues involved.
  • Consult ethical and legal guidelines and district policies that might apply to the resolution of each issue. Consider broad ethical principles as well as specific mandates involved.
  • Evaluate the rights, responsibilities, and welfare of all affected parties (e.g., child, service providers, other children, other staff, parents, siblings). Consider cultural characteristics of affected parties that might be salient to the decision.
ethical legal decision making model continued
Ethical & Legal Decision Making Model, continued
  • Generate a list of alternative decisions possible for each issue.
  • Enumerate the consequences of making each decision. Evaluate the short-term, ongoing, and long-term consequences of each possible decision, considering the possible psychological, social, and economic costs to affected parties. Consider how each possible course of action would affect the dignity of and responsible caring for all of the people involved. Consultation with colleagues may be helpful.
  • Consider any evidence that the various consequences or benefits resulting from each decision will actually occur (i.e., a risk-benefit analysis).
  • Make the decision.
online communication
Online Communication
  • Email
  • Facebook/Twitter
  • Texting/Skype
  • Apps
  • Online test administration/scoring
  • Websites
evolution of digital communication
Evolution of Digital Communication
  • 1890: Keypunch cards
  • 1942: First modern computer
  • 1946: Dick Tracy 2-Way Wrist Radio
  • 1973: Bill Gates graduates high school
  • 1973: First Hand-held Mobile Phone
predicting the future
Predicting the Future

“There’s no reason for any individual to have a computer in their home.”

“640K ought to be enough for anybody.”

Get your feet off my desk, get out of here, you stink, and we’re not going to buy your product.”

* Quoted from The Experts Speak by Christopher Cerf & Victor Navatsky. Random House, 1998.

privacy privileged communication
Privacy & Privileged Communication
  • Are communications by e-mail, Facebook, Twitter considered protected by privacy & practitioner-client privilege?
  • When is privilege invalidated?
email benefits
Email Benefits
  • Quick
  • Easy
  • Immediate Dissemination
  • Ease in Disseminating to Group
  • Ease in Garnering Response
email risks
Email Risks
  • Casual nature of communication
  • Speed of communication
  • Risk of primary dissemination
  • Risk of others’ dissemination
  • Security
  • Advantage of direct interaction with other

(e.g. parent diagnostic interview/feedback)

  • Disadvantages of
    • not knowing where the data from communication is stored.
    • Diminished quality of social interaction & non-verbal communication
facebook benefits
Facebook Benefits
  • Half a BILLION users

(National Public Radio, 12/1/10)

  • Ease of connection with others
  • Casual
  • Offers specific, limited connections for groups such as classes of students
facebook problems
Facebook Problems
  • Requires sign-up
  • Too casual?
  • Restricts how you can present yourself
  • Little control re what’s posted about you
  • Little control re who can access
cell phones texting
Cell Phones & Texting

Can you hear me now?


Who can hear me now?

Just how secure are those

calls & texts?

electronic storage forecast
Electronic Storage Forecast:

Cloudy, with a chance of

violations of confidentiality

healthcare insurance portability accountability act hipaa
Healthcare Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA)
  • Standardizing privacy protections for Protected Health Information (PHI).
  • HIPAA includes:
    • The Privacy Rule
    • The Transaction Rule
    • The Security Rule
hipaa privacy rule
HIPAA: Privacy Rule
  • Triggered once any PHI is transmitted electronically regarding any patient/client.
  • Applies to all electronic communication, including faxes.
  • Once triggered, it applies to all communication regarding all clients.
  • Provide PHI only with specific authorization
  • Only provide PHI needed for specific requested purpose.
hipaa security rule
HIPAA: Security Rule
  • Availability: The PHI can be accessed as needed by authorized persons.
  • Confidentiality: The PHI cannot be accessed by unauthorized persons, intentionally or unintentionally.
  • Encompasses administrative, physical and technical safeguards.
hipaa transmission rule
HIPAA Transmission Rule
  • Intended to set standards relative to submitting electronic claims.
  • Requires compliance with Privacy Rule:
    • PHI is only transmitted to those meant to receive it.
    • PHI is transmitted in a manner that protects or at least reduces the risk of it being forwarded in a manner that violates confidentiality.
sensible digital rules
Sensible Digital Rules
  • Send pdf files of you don’t want work altered.
  • Encrypt sensitive files that you email.
  • Use flash drives with passwords or encrypt everything on them.
  • Password-protect smart phones, iPads, etc. if they hold sensitive information.
  • Password-protect your home network.
more sensible digital rules
More Sensible Digital Rules
  • Logout and delete originals with digital copiers.
  • Be cautious about sensitive data on cloud services such as Dropbox.
  • Assume IT folks don’t fully appreciate professional standards in mental health.
  • Help your agency be compliant but don’t put your job on the line.
  • Be sensible but not paranoid.

American Psychological Association (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Available at

American Psychological Association (2007). Record keeping guidelines. American Psychologist, 62, 993-1004. Available at

Canadian Psychological Association (2000). Canadian code of ethics for psychologists 3rd ed.). Available at

Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, 20 U.S.C.A. Regulations appear at 34 C.F.R. Part 99. Available at

references continued
References, continued

Jacob, S., Decker, D. & Hartshorne, T. (2011). Ethics and law for school psychologists, 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act of 1996 (Pub. L. No. 104-191), 26 U.S.C. -294, 42 U.S.C.-201, 1395b-5.

Koocher, G. P. & Keith-Speigel, P. (2008) Ethics in psychology and the mental health professions: Standards and cases. New York: Oxford University Press.

National Association of School Psychologists. (rev. 2010). Principles for professional ethics. Available at

references continued1
References, continued

Schwab, N.C. & Gelfman, M.H. (2005). Legal issues in in school health services: A resource for school administrators, school attorneys, school nurses. New York: Authors Choice Press.

U.S. Dept. of Health & Human Services and U.S. Dept. of Education (November 2008). Joint guidance on the application of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) to student health records. Available at

contact information
Contact Information
  • Presenter:

Fred Provenzano, Ph.D., NCSP

5506 33rd Ave. NE, Suite D

Seattle, WA 98105

Office: 206/361-2343


  • Dr. Provenzano is the Western Regional Representative to the NASP Ethics & Professional Practices Committee.