how websites learn information architecture that adapts to use n.
Download
Skip this Video
Loading SlideShow in 5 Seconds..
How Websites Learn: Information Architecture that Adapts to Use PowerPoint Presentation
Download Presentation
How Websites Learn: Information Architecture that Adapts to Use

Loading in 2 Seconds...

play fullscreen
1 / 42

How Websites Learn: Information Architecture that Adapts to Use - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 92 Views
  • Uploaded on

How Websites Learn: Information Architecture that Adapts to Use . Peter Merholz Work: http://epinions.com Play: http://peterme.com/ http://peterme.com/ia2000/. Little Architects. A problem:. Increasingly, websites corral massive amounts of information

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'How Websites Learn: Information Architecture that Adapts to Use' - tress


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
how websites learn information architecture that adapts to use

How Websites Learn:Information Architecture that Adapts to Use

Peter Merholz

Work: http://epinions.com

Play: http://peterme.com/

http://peterme.com/ia2000/

a problem
A problem:
  • Increasingly, websites corral massive amounts of information
  • In fact, a strength of the Web is access to unlimited information
  • But how to present the information meaningfully?
a problem1
A problem:
  • Providing a singular, top-down editorial structure isn’t feasible
  • But nor can you allow a morass like USENET or an unstructured Web
another problem
Another problem
  • Web sites don’t respond to use
  • They’re static, and assume all information is of equal importance
case in point
Case in point
  • Productopia, R.I.P.
  • Dozens or hundreds of employed people are costly
a potential solution
A potential solution
  • Adaptive information architectures
  • Bottom-up organization based on qualities of the information and how the information is used
  • Information spaces that metamorphose based on use
  • Rich information spaces are complex systems, the study of which can inform our designs
structure based on the qualities of the information
Structure based on the qualities of the information
  • Linguistic processing and categorization schemes like Autonomy and Northern Light
  • Display systems like Self-Organizing Maps (http://websom.hut.fi/websom/), Thinkmap (http://www.thinkmap.com/), Cartia (http://www.cartia.com/)
the use is more important than inherent qualities
The use is more important than inherent qualities
  • While the Thing qua Thing is important,
  • It’s more important how people relate to and interact with that thing
  • Cognitive scientists have found that people categorize the world not on the inherent qualities of things, but on how they interact with those things. (Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things, Lakoff)
so what does all this mean
So, what does all this mean?
  • What is an information space that adapts to use?
  • An obvious and popular example: The Bestseller List
    • - People are interested in what’s popular
models for social effects
Models for social effects
  • Self-policing
  • Word of mouth
  • Footpaths
  • The Agora
self policing epinions com
Self-policing – Epinions.com
  • Nearly 700,000 opinions—no editing
  • Community can
  • - Rate content
  • - Trust each other
word of mouth information structured through people
Word of mouth – Information structured through people

You tell people about a movie you saw, a book you read, a car you drive

Known experts are sought out for their input

word of mouth aligning yourself with others tastes
Word of mouth – aligning yourself with others’ tastes

Epinions.com – Other products written about, other opinions worth reading

Launch.com – Collaborative filtering

Napster – Hot lists

word of mouth epinions com
Word of Mouth—Epinions.com

Generic

Personalized

word of mouth google com
Word of Mouth – Google.com
  • That HREF tag carries a lot of meaning
  • PageRank – measures importance through linking
footpaths
Footpaths

How is the information traversed and used?

Take advantage of what people do

footpaths1
Footpaths
  • Designers begin with a form…

http://fury.com/berkeleypaths

footpaths2
Footpaths
  • But people will make it their own…
footpaths swiki icons representing use
Footpaths – Swiki : Icons representing use
  • http://swiki.sics.se/
  • Footprints and Dinosaurs
  • Explicates what’s there, doesn’t make new connections
the king amazon com
The King – Amazon.com
  • People who bought X also bought…
    • Creates meaningful relationships that can break typical taxonomic bounds
  • Purchase Circles
    • Localized Bestseller lists
  • The Page You Made
    • Personalized clickstream analysis
amazon s biggest lesson
Amazon’s biggest lesson
  • Track use passively—don’t expect people will do the work for you
the agora
The Agora
  • People in the same place at the same time likely have something in common
  • Purple-moon.com
  • H2G2.com
a meta web everything2 com
A Meta-Web – Everything2.com
  • A bottom-up network of thought connected by
    • Hard links – explicit
    • Soft links – implicit
  • Ranked by voting
  • Tiered community
  • ‘Who’s online’

….They’ve got it all!

except a sense of purpose structure meaning
Except a sense of purpose, structure, meaning…
  • Difficult to figure out
  • Community is double-edged
  • In an email from Will Sargent:
  • The downfall of Everything2 (the site, not the architecture) is sadly linked into its quality control. Editors are picked from users who have made significant contributions to the site and have been there for a while. These editors/gods have free license to downvote and nuke as they see fit. So far so good.
  • The problem is that the editors are not impartial observers. They have been known to downvote nodes which use language which they don't like, political opinions they don't agree with, and nuke any nodes critical of E2 editorial policy itself. In one case, they outright banned a user who had extreme right wing opinions nobody liked very much. Of course, the guy who writes thestileproject.com got banned in seconds flat. There is no appeal, and if a node gets nuked there's no way for the writer to retrieve that content.
i mean no
I mean, No!
  • Obviously, there must be an initial organization
  • Create an organization that is flexible, not rigid
  • But make sure what changes are the connections, not the addresses
those three circles
Those %$&$#! Three Circles

BusinessContext

Content

Users

further concerns
Further Concerns
  • Data analysis – sooper-dooper important
  • Make sure your project has a real mission
  • Close watch—site structures based on use require a community… And online communities require gardeners to nurture them
a quick and dirty algorithm
A Quick and Dirty Algorithm
  • http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/INFOJB.html
  • Frequency—reinforce a link (AB) that a person traverses
  • Symmetry – reinforce reverse link (BA), a little less
  • Transivity – If a person goes AB and BC, reinforce AC
  • This is what leads to true restructuring
peer to peer
Peer to peer
  • Think beyond music
  • Think of an ever-shifting stream of information
  • “Architect” that
personal categorization
Personal Categorization
  • If I’m involved in SO/HO, I’m not interested in ‘electronics’ or ‘computers,’ ’I’m interested in what can help me
evolutionary model
Evolutionary Model
  • Again and again it’s been shown that attempts at God-like ‘organized’ top-down design typically fail
  • Too many contingencies, too chaotic
  • Bottom-up, rules-based structures adopt, adapt, and improve
  • Organization without explicit design is very powerful
from http pespmc1 vub ac be papers namurart html
From http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/papers/namurart.html
  • “We believe the laws of evolution, in which natural selection guarantees the survival of the fit and the extinction of the unfit, apply in all cases whether living beings, dead matter or knowledge is concerned. Ideas, chunks of knowledge, can be considered specific entities that rely on human or other carriers to multiply, mutate, adapt and survive. The human population and the technology devoted to communication can likewise be regarded as a huge ecology populated by ideas, theories or knowledge in general. The Internet has in the most recent years been becoming an integral part of this so-called ecology of knowledge…”
sites need to evolve structures
Sites need to evolve structures
  • Evolution requires
    • An Environment
    • In which elements are
    • Selected
    • Based on their
    • Fitness
    • --Natural Selection
natural selection
Natural selection
  • White and black moths
sites need to evolve structures1
Sites need to evolve structures
  • Structures require
    • Principles
    • In which
    • Meaningful organization
    • Arises from a
    • Significantly complex system
    • --Self organization
self organization
Self organization
  • Astronomical phenomena, crystal structures
resources
Resources
  • Principia Cybernetica Web - http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/SUPORGLI.html
  • Self-Organizing Systems FAQ - http://www.calresco.org/sos/sosfaq.htm
  • The Symbiotic Intelligence Project - http://ishi.lanl.gov/symintel.html
  • Cosma Shalizi’s Notebooks on Self-Organization - http://www.santafe.edu/~shalizi/notebooks/self-organization.html
  • Social Computing Program - http://www.sics.se/humle/socialcomputing/
  • ReferralWeb - http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/kautz/referralweb/index.html
  • The Origins of Order and At Home in the Universe, Stuart Kauffman
  • Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things, George Lakoff
  • How Buildings Learn, Stewart Brand