Resea r ch profiling of standards and innovation is it diverging or conveging 2011 ices workshop
Download
1 / 21

Resea r ch Profiling of 'Standards and Innovation', Is it Diverging or Conveging? (2011 ICES Workshop ) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 119 Views
  • Uploaded on

Resea r ch Profiling of 'Standards and Innovation', Is it Diverging or Conveging? (2011 ICES Workshop ). 27-28 June 2011 in Hangzhou, China Choi, Donggeun ([email protected]) Chief Manager, International Standards Team, KSA Secretariat, ICES. CV: Donggeun Choi.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'Resea r ch Profiling of 'Standards and Innovation', Is it Diverging or Conveging? (2011 ICES Workshop )' - trapper


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Resea r ch profiling of standards and innovation is it diverging or conveging 2011 ices workshop

Research Profiling of 'Standards and Innovation',Is it Diverging or Conveging?(2011 ICES Workshop )

27-28 June 2011in Hangzhou, China

Choi, Donggeun ([email protected])Chief Manager, International Standards Team, KSA

Secretariat, ICES


Cv donggeun choi
CV: Donggeun Choi

  • Dong-Geun Choi is Chief Manager at Korean Standards Association (KSA). With eleven years of experience in KSA, Dong-Geun ’s research has focused on standardization and innovation, standardization and IPR, and standards education.

  • Dong-Geun initiated and managed several international projects of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). Dong-Geun has served as project proponent/editor for APSC SCSC Education Initiatives in 2007-2011, and also served as Secretariat of International Cooperation of Education about Standardization (ICES) in 2009-2011.

  • In these international projects, Dong-Geun authored/edited several policy reports and guidelines: the first joint project between APEC-ISO joint project published as ISO TR 28682:2008, and the APEC SCSC Education Guidelines Series including the textbook about standardization for higher education, “Standardization: Fundamentals, Impact, and Business Strategy”.

  • Dong-Geun received a Bachelor’s degree in transport engineering from Hanyang University, and Master’s degree in transportation management from Seoul National University. He is now a PhD candidate in Technology Innovation and Management at Sungkyunkwan University.

  • Dong-Geun is a Program Committee Member for 2011 ITU-T Kaleidoscope Conference and 2011 IEEE International Conference on Standardisation and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT) . Donggeun’ academic publications have appeared in such journals as Scientometrics (SSCI), International Journal of Technology and Design Education(SCI-E), International Journals on IT Standards and Standardization Research(Scopus SSCI), and ISO Focus.


Summary
Summary

  • This presentation includes two sections about standardization and innovation research.

  • Section I includes the review of author’s recently published paper “Research profiling for standardization and innovation” (Choi, Lee & Sung, 2001; Scientometrics 88(1), page 259-278). This paper demonstrates that the standardization and innovation research has continuously grown from publication of 13 papers in 1995 to 68 papers in 2008; the majority of these papers have been published in the six subject group domains of management, economics, environment, chemistry, computer science, and tele-communications. Technology innovation management specialty journals are the most central sources favorable for these themes. We also present an exploratory taxonomy that offers nine topical clusters to demonstrate the contextual structures of standardization and innovation.

  • Section II raises a question to standardization community if the studies on ‘standardization and innovation’ are diverging or converging. Although standardization and Innovation research is clearly emerging, it is not certain if it is converging as an academic discipline.



I review of research profiling of standardization and innovation

I. Review of “Research Profiling of Standardization and Innovation

This section I includes summary of author’s published paper: “Research profiling of Standardization and Innovation”

Choi, Lee & Sung, 2011; Scientometrics 88(1), page 259-278)available at http://www.springerlink.com/content/f5p95542u30u26q0/)


Standardisation is a key factor in support of a number of government policies, including competitiveness, innovation, science and technology.

Its importance is growing with the globalisation, the convergence of technologies and a growing knowledge economy.

The UK Government Public Policy Interest in Standardisation (2009) – DIUS (Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills)


1 1 background what is the relationship of si r what strategy policy should we develop
1-1. Background- What is the relationship of SI-R? - What strategy/policy should we develop?

Standardization

Innovation

**SI-R: Standardization and Innovation Research


1 2 results subject domains variety of 135 domains management
1-2. Results – Subject Domains - Variety of 135 Domains: Management..





1 6 results journals published more than 5 papers
1-6. Results – Journals- published more than 5 papers


1 7 results exploratory taxonomy 4 groups 9 clusters factor analysis clustering
1-7. Results – Exploratory Taxonomy - 4 Groups – 9 Clusters - Factor Analysis & Clustering


1 8 results exploratory taxonomy 4 groups 9 clusters
1-8. Results – Exploratory Taxonomy - 4 Groups – 9 Clusters


1 8 results exploratory taxonomy 4 groups 9 clusters1
1-8. Results – Exploratory Taxonomy - 4 Groups – 9 Clusters


1 10 epilogue
1-10. Epilogue

  • Standards are Diverse in its Definition or Scope

    • Metrology, Industry Standards, Conformity Assessment

    • Agriculture, Building, ICT Technology, Service, QMS, SR

  • Innovation is Varying in its Definition or Scope

    • Launch of new products or process

    • Implementation of new solutions to technological, economical and social problems within an enterprise

       Rethinking about the nature of Standards & Innovation



Standards perceived images are different
Standards, AssetPerceived Images are Different

  • What ARE standards?

  • What are IN standards?

  • What are standards FOR?

  • What are IMPACT of standards?

  • WHO and HOW should develop and implement standards?

  • HOW should we look at and strategically utilize standards?


Diversity of standards measurement tech non tech
Diversity of Standards Asset- measurement, tech & non-tech.


Diversity of innovation in different fields gamber 2008
Diversity of Innovation Assetin different fields (Gamber 2008)

  • The term innovation has been examined by representatives of various fields of study, a number of varying definitions exist in literature.

  • In economics, innovation refers to the technological, social and economic changes.

  • In the field of political economics, innovation is referred to as a first commercial use of improvements, or in other words, the launch of a new product or process onto the market (acc. to [HOTZ-HART, 2001]).

  • From a business management point of view, innovation is the implementation of new solutions to technological, economical and social problems within an enterprise. In this case, innovation is aimed at finding new ways of fulfilling enterprise goals (cf for example [PLESCHAK & SABISCH, 1996]).


Standards and innovation research converging or diverging
Standards and Innovation Research Asset- Converging or Diverging?

  • Are the studies on ‘standardization and innovation’ are converging or diverging?

  • Although standardization and Innovation research is clearly emerging, it is not certain if it is converging as an academic discipline.


ad