1 / 1

Vibrational vs. Translational Energy in Promoting a Prototype Metal-Hydrocarbon Insertion Reaction David L. Proctor and

Mass Filter. Y. YCH 2. to ion counting. OPA beam. Metal Ablation Source. Ionizer (157 nm). CH 4. Molecular Source. Fixed Detector. Rotatable Source. 40dB Faraday isolator. λ /2 plate. Fiber launch for seed DFB laser. Expanding telescope. Reducing telescope. 1064nm pump.

torn
Download Presentation

Vibrational vs. Translational Energy in Promoting a Prototype Metal-Hydrocarbon Insertion Reaction David L. Proctor and

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Mass Filter Y YCH2 to ion counting OPA beam Metal Ablation Source Ionizer (157 nm) CH4 Molecular Source Fixed Detector Rotatable Source 40dB Faraday isolator λ/2 plate Fiber launch for seed DFB laser Expanding telescope Reducing telescope 1064nm pump High energy plate polarizer KTA, 45˚ Oscillator idler Beam dump (~1567nm) & Amplifier idler KTP 60˚, AR 532nm & 800nm (~3018cm-1) R70% 800nm KTP, 45˚ HR 800nm & 532nm Oscillator signal (~806nm) High energy plate polarizer λ /2 plate 532nm pump Reducing telescope Beam dump Vibrational vs. Translational Energy in Promoting a Prototype Metal-Hydrocarbon Insertion Reaction David L. Proctor and H. Floyd Davis Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Baker Laboratory, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-1301 Abstract Cornell Rotatable Source Crossed Molecular Beams Machine Results The TOF spectra and laboratory angular distributions could be simulated using an isotropic CM angular distribution kinetic energy release distribution (P(E)) peaked at 3 kcal/mol, extending to 11 kcal/mol. The reaction Y + CH4 HYCH3  YCH2 + H2 is initiated by C-H insertion involving an 20 ± 3 kcal/mol potential energy barrier. The reaction is studied in crossed molecular beams under two different conditions with nearly the same total energy. One experiment is carried out at a collision energy of 15.1 kcal/mol with one quantum of CH4 antisymmetric (3) stretching vibrational excitation (8.63 kcal/mol), the other at a collision energy of 23.8 kcal/mol. The reaction cross section for C-H stretch excited methane (s) is found to be at least a factor of 2.2 times larger than for ground state methane (g) at the same total energy. A pulsed beam of neutral metal atoms is produced by laser ablation of a rotating metal rod in a stream of carrier gas supplied by a pulsed valve. This pulse is temporally refined to ~7μs by a mechanical chopper wheel. Velocity is tuned by changing the carrier gas. A pulsed beam of CH4 is supplied by a second valve. The velocity is tuned by changing the proportion of CH4 in the gas mixture. Metal-containing products are photoionized at 157nm by a pulsed F2 laser in the extraction region of a quadrupole mass spectrometer. Time-of-flight distributions are measured by recording the ion signal as a function of the 157nm laser firing time. Chopper Wheel Observed Mode-specificity Several groups have studied the mode- and bond-specific reactivity of excited vibrational states of methane isotopologues in gas-phase hydrogen atom abstraction by chlorine atoms. (1,2) Recently a direct comparison of vibrational with translational energy for this reaction has been completed. (3) Dissociative adsorption of methane on metal surfaces, the rate limiting step in the steam reforming of methane, has also shown sensitivity to the methane vibrational state. (4-8) Many important chemical reactions, particularly those involving transition metal catalysts, involve insertion, rather than abstraction. Here, we performed the first systematic study of the relative reactivity of the methane antisymmetric stretch (ν3) in a prototype insertion reaction, Y + CH4 → YCH2 + H2, which has a large (20 ± 3 kcal/mol) insertion barrier. (9) Results and Conclusions The relative reactivity was calculated as the ratio of the total CM product flux (calculated during fitting) normalized by the relative beam fluxes. The flux for vibrationally excited CH4 included a calculation of the pumping fraction. Taking all factors into account we find that the total reactive cross section of CH4 (ν3=1) is ≥ 2.2 times that for ground state CH4. The observed behavior is somewhat analogous to 3-atom systems with “late” potential energy barriers. Assuming vibrationally adiabatic behavior, reactant vibrational excitation provides access to lower energy transition state geometries for insertion. Analogous studies of reactions involving bending and symmetric stretching levels are in progress. Together, these studies provide the first fundamental insight into how insertion chemistry may be promoted by different forms of reactant energy. Light Source for Vibrational Excitation: Infrared Pulsed Optical Parametric Oscillator/Amplifier The beam of a homebuilt pulsed OPO/OPA tuned to the Q(1) line of the CH4ν3 band at 3018.85cm-1 intersects the CH4 beam 5mm upstream of the interaction region. The saturation of the transition is determined to be near complete by monitoring the YCH2 signal at the center of mass scattering angle as a function of OPO energy. References Cited • Crim FF (1999) Vibrational state control of bimolecular reactions: Discovering and directing the chemistry. Accts. Chem. Res. 32:877-884. • Zare RN (1998) Laser control of chemical reactions. Science 279:1875-1879. • Yan S, Wu Y-T, Zhang B, Yue X-F, Liu K (2007) Do vibrational excitations of CHD3 preferentially promote reactivity toward the chlorine atom? Science 316:1723-1726. • Smith RR, Killelea DR, DelSesto DF, Utz AL (2004) Preference for vibrational over translational energy in a gas-surface reaction. Science 304:992-995. • Juurlink LBF, McCabe PR, Smith RR, DiCologero CL, Utz AL (1999) Eigenstate-resolved studies of gas-surface reactivity: CH4 (ν3) dissociation on Ni(100). Phys. Rev. Lett. 83:868-871. • Higgins J, Conjusteau A, Scoles G, Bernasek SL (2001) State selective vibrational (2ν3) activation of the chemisorption of methane on Pt(111). J. Chem. Phys. 114:5277-5283. • Juurlink LBF, Smith RR, Killelea DR, Utz AL (2005) Comparative study of C-H stretch and bend vibrations in methane activation on Ni(100) and Ni(111). Phys. Rev. Lett. 94:208303. • Maroni P, et a.l (2005) State resolved gas-surface reactivity of methane in the symmetric C-H stretch vibration on Ni(100). Phys. Rev. Lett. 94:246104. • Wittborn AMC, Costas M, Blomberg MRA, Siegbahn PEM (1997) The C-H activation reaction of methane for all transition metal atoms from the first three rows. J. Chem. Phys. 107:4318-4328. Energy (kcal/mol) Isoenergetic Collision Conditions Two experiments were performed, the first with relatively fast beams giving a center of mass collision energy of 23.8 kcal/mol (above the insertion barrier), and the second with nearly identical total energy split as 15.1 kcal/mol (below the insertion barrier) in translation and 8.63 kcal/mol in vibration (one quantum of the ν3 stretch). The two total energy distributions are shown at left. Signal at M/e=103 (YCH2+) is observed at the higher collision energy and at the lower collision energy with the OPO on, but not at the lower collision energy with the OPO off. This research was supported by the National Science Foundation under grant CHE-0316296

More Related