CM HOW-TO. DETAILED DISCUSSION. OBJECTIVE. Upon completion of this training you will demonstrate an understanding of how to perform a CM evaluation. Why are both a macro and micro approach taken when evaluating CM? Describe Phase 1 and 2 work at INPO
Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.
Describe Phase 1 and 2 work at INPO
What is the relationship of Appendix 2 to Appendix 1 of the How-To?
How should Appendix 1 and 2 be used during the evaluation?
How might the perception of margin differ between engineering and operators?
What is the main difference in the CM delta assessment sheet?REVIEW QUESTIONS
Of what value is the CM questionnaire?
Why must a CM evaluator always keep in mind the status of the enablers?
What are some bases for limiting on-site scope?
Explain the difference between a fundamental and high level attribute.
For what two functional areas must the CM evaluator/analyst determine if a focus is needed on-site?REVIEW QUESTIONS
MACRO & MICRO approach
1ST and 2ND pilots addressed all attributes
3rd pilot limited work on site (reduced team size) station buy-in on site scope
Must narrow scope of site work
Must identify issues early for E3 success
FOPs are the organizational weaknesses
Must make early call on functional areasAPPROACH
Determine focus areas
Determine additional specific information needed
Review detailed documents
Prepare details for site workTWO PHASES OF REVIEW/ANALYSIS AT INPOKEYS TO SUCCESS