1 / 25

Use of Incident Command Structure (ICS) in the Public Health Response to a Human Rabies Case

Use of Incident Command Structure (ICS) in the Public Health Response to a Human Rabies Case. Diseases in Nature Conference June 11, 2007. Cindy Kilborn, MPH, M(ASCP) Chief Epidemiologist. Objectives. Describe: Investigation of case Recognition of magnitude of response required

tobit
Download Presentation

Use of Incident Command Structure (ICS) in the Public Health Response to a Human Rabies Case

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Use of Incident Command Structure (ICS) in the Public Health Response to a Human Rabies Case Diseases in Nature Conference June 11, 2007 Cindy Kilborn, MPH, M(ASCP) Chief Epidemiologist

  2. Objectives • Describe: • Investigation of case • Recognition of magnitude of response required • Decision to utilize ICS • Discussion of action taken

  3. Overview of the Disease • Fatal viral infection of the Central Nervous System • Reservoir • Raccoons, skunks, bats, foxes and coyotes • Usual mode of transmission • Bite (or exposure to saliva) of infected mammal • Other: mucous membranes, aerosol, corneal transplant, etc. • Incubation period • several weeks -10 yr or longer • Characteristic symptoms • Fever and malaise, insomnia • Anxiety and confusion, abnormal behavior • Agitation progressing to delirium and hallucinations

  4. Case Report-May 2006 • 16 yr old male • May 4-complained of hypersensitivity and fear of swallowing • May 5-symptoms worsened • Tremors, involuntary movement of extremities, 4+ anxiety • Hx of no food, water or sleeping for 24 hrs • Lucid, oriented, answered questions appropriately • Community hospital emergency department • Initial clinical assessment-”altered mental status” • Transferred to tertiary care hospital • Low suspicion of infection • Jerking motions exacerbated by touch • Clinical impression-”anxiety attack”

  5. Case Report-May 2006, cont. • Transferred to area psychiatric facility • Developed fever, headache, projectile vomiting • Decision to transfer back to tertiary hospital • Condition worsened • Diverted to original hospital for intubation/stabilization • May 6-Admitted to tertiary hospital • Incoherent, could not recognize parents • CSF-no organisms seen • Dark brown emesis • “glassy eyed” • Steady deterioration

  6. Case Report-May 2006, cont. • 2nd tertiary hospital visit-parents mention possible bat exposure • Approximately 4 weeks prior to onset • Felt rustling on cheek while napping • Found bat in room (window open/no screen) • Informed parent • Bat caught with towel and discarded • Not reported to physician or health dept.

  7. Case Report-May 2006, cont. • May 6-Infectious Disease physician called DSHS and CDC • Information on submitting specimens • Specimens submitted on May 8; result positive May 9 • Feasibility of implementing treatment protocol used successfully in Wisconsin 2004 • Not implemented • May 12-case expired • 1st human rabies death in Texas since 1997

  8. Initial Public Health Response • May 8-HCPHES Epidemiology received possible rabies case • Info from DSHS 6/5S Zoonosis Control staff • Son in same school as case • Call from school district health coordinator • Also reporting a possible rabies case in a student • Immediately contacted DSHS Infectious Disease Control Unit (IDCU) • Did not know of the possible case

  9. Initial Public Health Response, cont. • Initiated internal notification tree • Began investigation to verify case • Description of symptoms accurate • Rabies was included in differential diagnosis • Began identification of contacts • Immediate family members • Close friends • Healthcare workers (HCWs) • Possible contacts at school

  10. Initial Public Health Response, cont. • Customized existing assessment tools for identified risk groups • Info used from additional tools • DHSH 6/5S Zoonosis Control • Healthcare workers • CDC Viral and Rickettsial Zoonoses Branch • Family and other social contacts • Continued identification of all HCWs • Distributed HCW assessment to all hospital and ambulance transport staff involved • Finalized other assessment forms for family/social contacts for later use

  11. Initial Public Health Response, cont. • Epi staff continued investigation • Conference call held with DSHS & CDC • Parents difficult to reach • Animal exposure not mentioned in MR • Confirmed by interview with neighbor • HCPHES activates ICS

  12. Incident Command Structure • Modeled after NIMS • Areas to address • Epidemiology & surveillance • Crisis communication for public & media • Veterinary response • Treatment guidelines for medical community • Command structure established • Incident Commander-Medical Epidemiology physician • Operations Chief-Chief Epidemiologist • Planning Chief-Senior Epidemiologist • Logistics Chief-staff Epidemiologist • Finance Chief-Administrative Services Director

  13. Incident Command Structure, cont. • ICS Chief assignments re-evaluated • Epi staff needed “in the field” • Not able to manage both roles • ICS positions reassigned • Public Health Preparedness Division • Operations, Planning, Logistics • Incident Commander not reassigned

  14. Public Health Operation • Phone bank established-12 hr/day • Up-to-date rabies info posted on web • Contact investigations • Evaluation of risk • Recommendation of PEP

  15. Public Health Operation • Phone Bank Operations • Set up 10 phone lines • Identified a phone bank coordinator • Provided “just in time” training for staff • Not widely publicized to general public • Calls requiring exposure assessment referred to Epidemiology • Calls with additional concerns about bats and rabies referred to Veterinary Public Health • In operation 5/10 – 5/17; 140 calls received

  16. Exposure Assessment at School • Identified the potential students at risk (~250 classmates, team mates and friends) • Identified an area at the school to hold interviews • Assembled HCPHES staff for “on site” activities • Rabies overview presenter • Individual interviewers • Data entry clerks and coordinator • May 11-Rabies exposure assessment at school

  17. Exposure Assessment at School, cont. • Students divided into groups of about 75 • Presentation given on rabies and its transmission • Students self-selected if they still considered themselves at risk • Those students were individually interviewed • Information from assessment entered into laptops on site • Public Health physician evaluated all assessments • PEP recommended for students meeting criteria • Epidemiologists and nurses inform parents

  18. Session for parents at school • HCPHES Executive Director presented • Other HCPHES also in attendance to assist with questions • Deputy Director • Director of Veterinary Public Health • Public Information staff • Epidemiology staff

  19. Additional Exposures Identified • Case was a swimming instructor for pre-K kids • Swimming team requested an on site educational program – May 13 • Utilized PHP Van for transport • Interviewers available for individual assessment • After presentation, no parents felt child at risk

  20. Assessing Risk • Public Health physicians assessed all forms • Identified additional potential risks • “Gleeking” • Chocolate fountain • Recommendations based on CDC Guidelines • 142 people assessed (HCW-42; CC-100) • 53 were recommended PEP (HCW-17; CC-36 • Several “not at risk” people obtained PEP privately • Parents of 3 children recommended for PEP declined

  21. Veterinary Public Health Operations • Conducted environmental assessment of the home • 2 story home in wooded residential area • Case’s room had several windows but no screens • Several areas around home suitable bat habitat • No evidence of bat colonies or activity

  22. Veterinary Public Health Operations, cont. • Bat rabies in Harris County is enzootic • 2004 - 48 positive bats • 2005 – 30 positive bats • 2006 – 12 positive bats prior to May 9 • Closest identified positive bat had been 16 miles west of home

  23. Veterinary Public Health Operations, cont. • Publicity of case raised level of awareness • Veterinary Public Health activity increased • On average-35 animals submitted/mo. • In May 135 submitted; 96 were bats • On average-115 bite cases reported/mo • In May 193 cases reported • VPH staff managed increased phone calls • Developed screening questionnaire • Counseled callers on risk • Facilitated testing of bats • Referred calls to private physician for PEP

  24. Public Information Operations • HCPHES Office of Public Information • Acted as point of contact for all public health aspects • Sent media advisories • Arrange press conference and media packet • Info on rabies prevention • Attended by TV, radio and print media • English, Spanish and Vietnamese • Coordinated visual demo of safe bat capture • Compiled Incident Activity Binder • Historical documentation • Reference tool for future use

  25. After Action Review • HCPHES Office of Public Health Preparedness • Held review for overall Human Rabies Response • Shared experiences • Discussed successes and challenges • Identified areas for improvement • Applicable to other public health emergencies

More Related