340 likes | 494 Views
Organizational Overview. Licensed for 47 acute care beds109-bed long-term care unit (24-bed dementia unit)Emergency and urgent care departmentsOccupational health clinicFive family health clinics (Pella, Bussey, Sully, Monroe and Knoxville)Specialty clinicsHospital-based dialysis unit. Organizational Overview.
E N D
1. Pella Regional Health Center Health Information System Selection
2. Organizational Overview Licensed for 47 acute care beds
109-bed long-term care unit (24-bed dementia unit)
Emergency and urgent care departments
Occupational health clinic
Five family health clinics (Pella, Bussey, Sully, Monroe and Knoxville)
Specialty clinics
Hospital-based dialysis unit
3. Organizational Overview Surgical Services
Rehabilitative services
Hospice
Home Health
100-bed residential care facility
Independent living campus
4. A New Vision To establish a fully integrated enterprise-wide information system encompassing clinical and financial applications which are tied to a patient-centric database enabling data to flow to authorized customers through internal and external networks.
5. Potential Derailment Negotiated with a single vendor
Unable to reach an affordable price
Ongoing concern with respect to the perceived level of risk
6. Revived the search process!
7. Back to Basics Which vendor and products?
How much should be spent?
The nursing process in IS?
8. Existing Vendors/Applications
9. Existing Vendors/Applications
10. Diagnosis Ineffective Communication related to multiple silos of data
11. Silos of Data Redundant processes
Less than optimal patient safety
Labor intensive data analysis and reporting
12. Diagnosis Management of Therapeutic Regimen, Challenging: Community
13. Multiple Systems (Including a Paper-based Medical Record) Patient-specific data not readily accessible
Shadow charts created within departments
Labor intensive for IS staff
Maximum value NOT derived from individual systems
14. Dispel the Myths We will find the perfect system
If you build it - they will come!
Implementing a new HIS will automatically solve organizational inefficiencies
Mass consensus and enthusiasm for a vendor will be the key indicator for the right choice
15. Overall Approach(Source: Dr. Leo Black, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville) There are choices to be made:
Choice #1
Start with the “big picture” and later
develop individual programs
OR
Start with individual programs and later try to link them
16. Choice #1 Start with the “big picture” and later develop (enhance) individual programs.
Data center design and build
Migrate current functionality to new HIS
Enterprise-wide order entry with focus toward point-of-care medical necessity checking
Enterprise-wide EMR for resulting
17. Overall Approach(Source: Dr. Leo Black, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville) Choice #2
Go predominantly with one vendor
OR
Go with best of breed
18. Choice #2 Go predominately with one vendor.
Minimize interfaces
Similar “look and feel” across the enterprise
Ultimately achieve maximum utilization of functionality
Sound Easy?
19. Which Vendor? Consultant
Request for information and request for proposal
Current state was evaluated
Written report submitted
Functional specifications provided by consultant and sent to relevant departments
20. Lessons Learned Interview several consulting firms and evaluate their methods for facilitating your selection process:
Pose questions that uncover a “one size fits all” approach
Identify potential conflicts of interest
Request references of similar organizations – conduct conference calls to solicit their experience and satisfaction
21. Lessons Learned Define deliverables and establish realistic expectations
Maintain leadership – a consultant will never know your organization as well as you, nor will they lead you to the perfect system!
22. Best of Breed Sirens
23. Identify Health Information System (HIS) Vendors Retrieved the 2003 HIMSS Conference Exhibitor List
Quick scan of websites to identify health information system vendors
Categorized vendors
24. HIS Vendor Offerings Created a table to identify the clinical components of each vendor’s HIS
Eight vendors provided: registration, scheduling, clinical data repository, order management, clinical documentation, laboratory, medical imaging, pharmacy and health information management
25. Potential Vendors Cerner
CPSI
Dairyland
Epic
Keane
McKesson
MediTech
Siemens
26. Overall Approach(Source: Dr. Leo Black, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville) Choice #3
View this as an isolated project/function
OR
View this as part of an overall institutional strategy
27. Information Technology Portfolio
28. Information Technology Portfolio
29. Information Technology Portfolio
30. Information Technology Portfolio
31. Information Technology Portfolio
32. Overall Approach(Source: Dr. Leo Black, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville) Choice #4
Is a positive financial return very important in the near term?
OR
Is financial return of lower importance than other goals?
33. Estimating Return on Investment (ROI) Financial return was deemed important and necessary, but a long-term view was utilized.
Literature review completed
Vendor estimates reviewed
Potential line items identified, linked with literature citations and issues for consideration
34. Line Items within ROI % Gain in patient volumes within out-patient clinics
% Gain in surgical net revenue
Reduction in file clerk positions in HIM
Reduction in labor costs associated with charge entry
Avoidance of inappropriate/redundant orders
Reduced denials
35. Line Items within ROI Increase in-patient charge capture
Increase out-patient charge capture
Reduction in paper forms and supplies
Reduction in labor costs associated with data collection/analysis
Reduction in labor costs related to pharmacy billing
Decreased nursing overtime