1 / 17

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive Reasoning. Generalizing from cases seen to infer information African elephant (3.2-4.0m) Asian elephant (2.5-3.0m) So we cannot find an elephant < 1.5m? (Only) proved to be false Deductive vs. inductive More reliable? Generate new information?. Wason’s Cards.

tiger
Download Presentation

Inductive Reasoning

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Inductive Reasoning • Generalizing from cases seen to infer information • African elephant (3.2-4.0m) • Asian elephant (2.5-3.0m) • So we cannot find an elephant < 1.5m? • (Only) proved to be false • Deductive vs. inductive • More reliable? • Generate new information?

  2. Wason’s Cards

  3. Abductive Reasoning • Derive explanations • How people perceived XY? • X相對於背景的顯著程度 • 「氧氣、電線、達到燃點」 • 描述的先後順序 • See next two slides

  4. Problem Solving

  5. Problem Space Theory • Newell & Simon • Problem space including problem states • States: initial/goal • State transition operator • Legal/illegal • Considering human constraints • Short-term memory

  6. Problem Space Theory goal state

  7. Farmer-Wolf-Goat-Cabbage Problem

  8. Farmer-Wolf-Goat-Cabbage Problem

  9. Class Discussion • How many states does a user have in editing text in MS Word?

  10. Analogical Mapping • 假設你是一個醫生，正在治療一位胃癌病患 • 病情不允許開刀 • 不去除腫瘤的話，病人將死亡 • 你可以使用X光消滅腫瘤 • 強度足以摧毀腫瘤的X光也會殺死健康組織 • 強度不足的X光無法摧毀腫瘤 • 如何消滅腫瘤，但不要破壞周圍的健康組織？

  11. Analogical Mapping

  12. Bridging the Gap in Computer Security Warnings: a Mental Model Approach, IEEE Security & Privacy, 2011, pp. 18-26. • Computer security warnings • Standard warnings • Risks (Likelihood + Consequences) + Instructions • Goal • What are novices thinking in facing warnings? • What are the differences between advanced users and novices?

  13. Mental Models

  14. Mental Models

  15. Mental Models

  16. Mental Models

  17. Rigidity in problem solving: Functional Fixedness fixation Maier’s (1931) two-string problem

More Related