1 / 27

Strategies for student retention

SMART . Strategies for student retention. Welcome!. Alice Camuti, Ph.D. Director, Career Services Tennessee Technological University. SMART. Agenda. Student Retention – Why It’s Important Strategies That Influence Retention Results of National Survey TTU Retention Efforts

tibor
Download Presentation

Strategies for student retention

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SMART Strategies for student retention

  2. Welcome! Alice Camuti, Ph.D. Director, Career Services Tennessee Technological University

  3. SMART Agenda • Student Retention – Why It’s Important • Strategies That Influence Retention • Results of National Survey • TTU Retention Efforts • TTU Retention Experiment • Making a Difference in Your Programs • Developing Campus Partnerships

  4. SMART Why Care? • Governing Agencies are moving from enrollment based to outcomes based formula’s • States are pushing for higher college graduation rates of their constituents • It’s the right thing to do

  5. SMART Points About Student Retention • Student departure has little to do with flunking out (only 10-15%) • Social isolation is primary cause for departure • 75% of most students leave within the first two years of college Source: Tinto, 1987, 2007

  6. SMART Retention and Graduation • What percentage of first-time freshmen in Fall return for their . . . . . . spring semester TTU: 91% UTK: 86.2% . . . second year TTU: 73% UTK: 71.7% • What percentage of students graduate… …within five years? TTU: 41% UTK: 58.5% …within six years? TTU: 48% UTK: 60.5%

  7. Tennessee Change in Focus • Moving to a productivity-driven funding formula • Graduation rates • Degree production • Student Retention • “Complete College Tennessee Act”

  8. SMART National Survey Results Of 220 respondents… • 49% Did not know if they had a graduation requirement goal • 49% Did not know if they had a retention rate requirement goal

  9. SMART April 2012 – National Survey • Population: 2800 Career Services Directors • 220 respondents 7.9% response rate • www.SurveyMonkey • 84% Centralized • 53.8% public • 65.2% 0-10,000 FTE …….13.4% > 25,000 FTE

  10. SMART Retention Strategies Predictors of persistence include: • Coordinated Studies Program (first-year seminar) • College GPA • Hours studied per week • Perceptions of faculty • Involvement with other students (Tinto, 1997)

  11. SMART Effective Practices Identified in the Literature • Honors programs for academically advanced students • Academic support program or services • Programs designed specifically for at-risk students • Mandatory advising, one-on-one and face-to-face between faculty and students • Programs designed specifically for first-year students Source: Noel-Levitz 2011

  12. SMART Programs/Practices Across the U.S.

  13. SMART Career Services Participation

  14. SMART TTU Campus Retention Initiatives • Retention Committee • First-year Connections 1 hr. Seminar • Freshmen Mentors – 2 semesters • Freshmen “Majors” fair; Engineering majors fair, Business majors and clubs fair

  15. SMART TTU Initiatives (continued) • Communication with “at risk” students • Contact during the summer: non-enrollees • Learning Commons in Library • Living/Learning Villages

  16. SMART TTU Retention Committee Experiment • 28 freshmen class sections/587 students • Psychosocial teaching method = 14 • Academic skill-building method = 14 • Fall of 2009 implemented, Fall of 2010 results

  17. SMART Which Cohort had the Higher Retention Rates? • Cohort A – psychosocial • Cohort B – academic skills

  18. SMART Psychosocial Sorry, You are Wrong Link Back

  19. SMART Academic Skill-Building Yes, you are correct Link Back

  20. SMART Experiment Results • Probability that a student will LEAVE within Three (3) semesters: • Psychosocial 27% • Academic 21% Logistical Regression, p=.0371, 95% significance

  21. SMART Academic Skill-Building • Time management • Study Skills • Career Plan • Career Assessment • ‘Structured’ classroom environment

  22. SMART Where Do We Fit In • Skill building workshops focusing on freshmen • Resume for freshmen • Co-op /internship exposure • Career assessment • Assist with majors fairs

  23. SMART Become a Retention Champion • Campus Retention Initiatives • Week of welcome, fall semester activities • Not always related • Develop Partnerships with on-campus departments involved in student success • i.e. first-year seminar classes

  24. SMART First Year Seminars • Invite freshmen classes in for tours • Offer to come to the freshmen classes with “deal or no deal” interactive trivia game • Create career content/career components for first year seminars • Instructor newsletter: events/workshops/pre-packaged PowerPoint presentations

  25. SMART Questions…Discussion… Your Ideas

  26. SMART Thank You! Alice Camuti acamuti@tntech.edu 931-372-3232

  27. SMART REFERENCES • Derby, D. & Smith, T.(2004). An orientation course and community college retention. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 28, 763-773. • Glass, J. (1995). Student participation in college orientation course, retention, and gpa. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 19, 117-132. • Kuth, G. (2006). Student Success in College. Jossey-Base. • Noel-Levitz (2011). 2011 Student retention practices at four-year and two-year institutions. Retrieved January 10, 2012 from www.noellevitz.com • Swail, W. (2006). Seven guiding questions for student retention. Student Success, January 2006. Retrieved from www.educationalpolicy.org • Tinto, V. (2006/2007). Research and practice of student retention: what next? Journal College Student Retention, 8(1), 1-19. • Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago. • Tinto, V. (Nov/Dec 1997). Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational characteristics of student persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 68, 599-623. • Tinto, V. (July/August 1988). Stages of student departure: reflections on the longitudinal character of student leaving. Journal of Higher Education, 59(4), 438-455.

More Related