1 / 3

MEPAG Supporting Research and Technology Science Analysis Group (SRT SAG) Current Status

MEPAG Supporting Research and Technology Science Analysis Group (SRT SAG) Current Status. Vicky Hamilton, SwRI (Chair) Ariel Anbar, ASU Michael Mischna, JPL Michael Mellon, CU Kevin Righter, JSC Charles Budney, JPL David Beaty, JPL. Purpose & Timeline.

thibault-jaycob
Download Presentation

MEPAG Supporting Research and Technology Science Analysis Group (SRT SAG) Current Status

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MEPAG Supporting Research and Technology Science Analysis Group (SRT SAG) Current Status • Vicky Hamilton, SwRI (Chair) • Ariel Anbar, ASU • Michael Mischna, JPL • Michael Mellon, CU • Kevin Righter, JSC • Charles Budney, JPL • David Beaty, JPL

  2. Purpose & Timeline • Provide input on behalf of the Mars community to the Supporting Research and Technology study currently being conducted by the Planetary Science Subcommittee of the NASA Advisory Council (Ron Greeley, Chair) • SAG has been reviewing programs for relevance to MEPAG/Mars Program goals • Collecting community input through Dec. 20 (Monday) • Draft white paper/Exec Comm review: January 5, 2011 • Final document: January 7, 2011

  3. Please Comment! • Which current science-related research and technology programs (e.g., MDAP, PIDDP, PGG) are essential in meeting Mars Program objectives? • Are there research/technology programs or infrastructure that appear to be missing currently, but that are essential in meeting Mars Program objectives? • Do you feel that non-Mars-specific R&A programs are maintaining a consistent attitude towards Mars-related research? • What method(s), if any, do you feel would lead to greater efficiency in the grant submission, review, and award process? • For grant programs that offer longer duration awards, please comment on whether or not you take advantage of this option and why. Send responses to Vicky Hamilton by December 20 hamilton@boulder.swri.edu

More Related