1 / 31

UK student nurses' education values: a three-centre study

UK student nurses' education values: a three-centre study. Carol Haigh , Senior Lecturer in Research; Natalie Yates-Bolton , Lecturer in Nursing Martin Johnson , Professor in Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Salford, UK. What are Values?.

thais
Download Presentation

UK student nurses' education values: a three-centre study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. UK student nurses' education values: a three-centre study Carol Haigh, Senior Lecturer in Research; Natalie Yates-Bolton, Lecturer in Nursing Martin Johnson, Professor in Nursing, School of Nursing, University of Salford, UK

  2. What are Values? • A cognitive and emotional disposition towards a person, object or idea. • Attitudes are similar, but more specific. ‘Measurement’ of attitudes can suggest strength that values are held

  3. How are values adopted? • Genetic disposition (Dawkins) • Species altruism, ‘Selfish Gene’ • Behaviourism and Social Learning Theory (Bandura) • Modelling and perceived reward/status • Existential/humanist (Raths) • Values chosen, freely from alternatives

  4. Background Gerard Fealy (2004, Irish Context) Quotes from Attitude surveys: • ‘the nurse who is good at theory is rarely good at the practical side of nursing’ (McGowan 1980, p. 94). • university education was not appropriate for nurses (Scanlan 1991) • Underlying these views are ‘values’

  5. Approaches to the study of values • Spranger’s (1928) ‘Types of ‘men’. ” • Theoretical, Economic, Aesthetic, Social, Political, Religious • Theoretical “…since the interests of the theoretical man (sic) are empirical, critical and rational, he is necessarily an intellectualist, frequently a scientist or a philosopher.” (Vernon and Allport 1931, p233) • Allport, Vernon and Lindzey (1960) values instrument draws on this, used by several nurse researchers

  6. Early studies of educational values In a UK study Singh (1971) compared students on ‘experimental’ courses (e.g. combined degree/SRN) and Diploma/SRN) courses with ‘traditional’ SRN students but found no statistically significant difference on the ‘theoretical’ value.

  7. Singh (1971) However when he compared ‘experimental’ students (N = 229) with non-nursing ‘female undergaduates’ (N = 147) he found a notable and statistically significant difference (p < 0.001)

  8. O’Neill (1973) found the opposite (p < 0.1) In the USA

  9. Research Questions • Do student nurses’ educational values vary between different universities? • Do educational values in student nurses differ by programme of study? • Do educational values in student nurses change across time?

  10. Sample • 3 universities • Southern, Russell, Riverside • Pre-registration students (n=1133) • Diploma n=835 • Degree n=287 (11 missing responses on this variable)

  11. Methods 1 William A Scott General Values Instrument (1959). This is a Likert Scale Instrument measuring general attitudes; Honesty Religiousness Intellectualism Self Control Academic Achievement Independence Altruism Nursing specific items added which included the Scott categories plus 2 other - Paternalism and Authority A sub set of variables focusing upon general and professional educational values is the focus of this presentation. We report on altruism and honesty(Johnson, Haigh and Yates-Bolton JAN, 57, 4, 366-374)

  12. Educational values subset - Scott • Reading only things that don’t pose any intellectual challenge (S2) • Working hard to do well academically (S4) • Ignoring lectures and text-books that are difficult (S7) • Not letting studies interfere with one’s social life (S24) • Striving hard to get the top marks in the group (S27) • Being interested only in one’s work (S34)

  13. Educational values subset - Johnson • Little has been gained by educating nurses in a University rather than a Hospital School of Nursing (J5) • Nursing should be a highly educated profession like Medicine and Law (J8) • Academic qualifications should not be important to nursing career advancement (J16)

  14. Methods 2 • Ethical approval obtained from participating organisations • Student questionnaire administered in class time – 20 minutes. Investigators not particularly involved with programme • Ordinal data was analysed using SPSS • Descriptive stats • Correlation • MANOVA

  15. Demographics - Gender

  16. Demographics - age ranges

  17. Students with any NVQ Attainment by Centre 40.00 35.00 35.71 30.00 25.00 28.16 % of cohort 20.00 15.00 17.03 10.00 5.00 0.00 Southern N = 98 Russell N = 417 Riverside N =618 University Educational Demographics - NVQ

  18. Proxy measure of educational entry level 9.00 8.00 8.5 7.00 6.8 6.5 6.00 5.00 Mean GCE and GCSE O and A level Per student 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 Southern N = 98 Russell N = 417 Riverside N = 618 Educational Demographics – entry level GSCE,O & A level

  19. Percentage degree possession by Centre 8 7.2 7 6 Percentage 4.8 5 3.8 4 3 2 1 0 Southern N = 98 Russell N = 417 Riverside N = 618 University Educational Demographics - degree

  20. Educational values relationships by university - 1 • The relationship between university and admiration for those who do not let studies interfere with social life was investigated • There was a small weak negative statistically significant correlation between the two variables [rs= -.101 n= 1133 p =.001] • This gives of coefficient of determination of 1% • This suggests that students who attended Riverside university were more likely to admire this behaviour

  21. Educational values relationships by university- 2 • The relationship between university and admiration for those who strive hard to get the top marks was investigated • There was a weak statistically significant correlation between the two variables [rs= .202 n= 1133 p <.001] giving a coefficient of determination of 4% • This suggests that students who attended Riverside university were more likely to admire this behaviour

  22. Educational values relationships by programme of study - 1 • The relationship between programme of study and admiration for those who strive hard to get the top marks was investigated • There was a small weak positive statistically significant correlation between the two variables [rs= .133 n= 1133 p <.001] giving a coefficient of determination of 1.7% • This suggests that students who were enrolled on degree programmes were more likely to admire this behaviour

  23. Educational values relationships by programme of study - 2 • The relationship between programme of study and agreement with the statement ‘Nursing should be a highly educated profession like Medicine and Law’ was investigated • There was a weak positive statistically significant correlation between the two variables [rs= .104 n= 1133 p <.001] giving a coefficient of determination of 1.0% • This suggests that students who were enrolled on degree programmes were more likely to agree with this stance

  24. Educational values relationships by year of study - 1 • The relationship between year of study and admiration for those who ignore lectures and text-books that are difficult was investigated • There was a weak negative statistically significant correlation between the two variables [rs= -.166 n= 1133 p <.001] giving a coefficient of determination of 2% • This suggests that third year students were less likely to admire this behaviour

  25. Educational values relationships by year of study - 2 • The relationship between year of study and the variable ‘little has been gained by educating nurses in a University rather than a Hospital School of Nursing’ was investigated • There was a weak negative statistically significant correlation between the two variables [rs= -.125 n= 1133 p <.001] giving a coefficient of determination of 1.5% • This suggests that third year students were less likely to agree with this statement

  26. MANOVA • Multivariate tests for statistical significance between groups by • University • Programme of Study • Year of study • Used Pillai’s trace as test of statistically significant differences between groups because of differences in sample sizes • Because this used multiple comparisons we applied a Bonferroni adjustment which gave a new probability value of .007

  27. Working hard to do well academicallyDiploma and Degree admire • Overall students on both programmes viewed working hard to do well academically less positively by the third year. (Diploma – M 4.78, 4.74,4.70) (Degree – M 4.85, 4.83,4.64) • Southern Diploma held opposite view in year 3 (M – 4.64, 4.60.4.79) • Impact on life long learning

  28. Studying hard to get good marks in tests and exams admire • Overall Diploma and Degree students viewed studying hard to get good marks in tests and exams less favourably in the third year. • Exception Southern Diploma students

  29. Between subjects effects • For the sub set ‘educational values’ • University accounted for 3.6% of variance (p=.001) • Programme of study accounted for 6.1% of variance (p=>.001) • Year of study accounted for 3.2% of variance (p=>.001)

  30. Conclusions • There were some variable specific differences between the student groups • There was values congruence across the diploma groups as there was across the degree groups • The biggest difference between the student groups was accounted for by programme of study. • For some educational values there was no evidence of improvement over time • Many students are leaving nurse education with less intellectual enthusiasm than with which they entered.

  31. Thank you • Carol Haigh c.a.haigh@salford.ac.uk • Natalie Yates-Bolton n.yates-bolton@salford.ac.uk • Martin Johnson m.johnson2@salford.ac.uk

More Related