190 likes | 336 Views
E N D
1. ESTIMATING METHOD AND USE OF LANDFILL SETTLEMENT by Michael L. Leonard, Sr., P.E., SCS Engineers, Inc.Kenneth J. Floom, Jr., P.E., Essentia Management, Inc.
2. INNOVATIVE LANDFILL OPERATIONS/OPTIMIZING AIRSPACE USE
Permitting New Landfills-Why So Difficult?
Stringent Siting Criteria
Ever Increasing Land Values
Land Use Conflicts
Extensive Environmental Studies and Restrictions
Vertical or Lateral Expansions—Also Limited
3. INNOVATIVE LANDFILL OPERATIONS/OPTIMIZING AIRSPACE USE
Airspace As An Asset
Requires Diligent Asset Management
Loss Can Be Irrecoverable
4. INNOVATIVE LANDFILL OPERATIONS/OPTIMIZING AIRSPACE USE
Construction Methods
Monitoring Airspace Use
Settlement Predictions
5. INNOVATIVE LANDFILL OPERATIONS/OPTIMIZING AIRSPACE USE Waste Placement
Compaction
Cover
6. INNOVATIVE LANDFILL OPERATIONS/OPTIMIZING AIRSPACE USE
Waste Placement
Initial Density—Ways to Improve and Monitor
Typical Achieved Values
Overburden Soil Stockpiles
Removal of Soil Cover
7. INNOVATIVE LANDFILL OPERATIONS/OPTIMIZING AIRSPACE USE What Is Density That Matters? Refuse Density, Total Density??
“Landfilling Density”—Defined As Weight of Refuse Divided By Total Air Space Consumed By Refuse, Cover Soil and Other Operations Soil
8. INNOVATIVE LANDFILL OPERATIONS/OPTIMIZING AIRSPACE USE Table 1 in Paper-26 Landfills Across US and Canada
Initial Refuse Density Typical Range: 900-1200 pcy
Initial Total Density Typical Range(includes cover soil): 1100-1300 pcy
Initial “Landfilling Density” Typical Range: 350-600 pcy
Typical Waste to Cover Soil Volume Ratios of 2:1 to 3:1 Cause The Low “Landfilling” or Effective Density
9. INNOVATIVE LANDFILL OPERATIONS/OPTIMIZING AIRSPACE USE Long-Term “Landfilling Density” Typical Range; 800-1500pcy
2.2-2.5 x Initial Landfilling Density
Why??
10. INNOVATIVE LANDFILL OPERATIONS/OPTIMIZING AIRSPACE USE Waste Settlement Over Time
Settlement Mechanisms
Mechanical/Primary Compression
Biodegradation
Physical Creep Compression
Physical-Chemical/Corrosion
Interaction
Consolidation
11. INNOVATIVE LANDFILL OPERATIONS/OPTIMIZING AIRSPACE USE
12. INNOVATIVE LANDFILL OPERATIONS/OPTIMIZING AIRSPACE USE Biodegradation Prediction is Key
Model
ST = O x TR x SF
SF = a1/aT; Settlement Factor
Where a1 = future gas generation; aT = total gas generation
QLFG = 0.029 GLFG(e-kN-e-kt); gas generation
13. INNOVATIVE LANDFILL OPERATIONS/OPTIMIZING AIRSPACE USE
14. INNOVATIVE LANDFILL OPERATIONS/OPTIMIZING AIRSPACE USE Physical Creep Compression = Approx. 2% of fill thickness per log cycle of time
15. INNOVATIVE LANDFILL OPERATIONS/OPTIMIZING AIRSPACE USE
16. INNOVATIVE LANDFILL OPERATIONS/OPTIMIZING AIRSPACE USE
17. INNOVATIVE LANDFILL OPERATIONS/OPTIMIZING AIRSPACE USE Landfill Surface Generated By Model Is Input To Computer Data Base
Siteworks, InRoads, SoftDesk Program Used To Compare to Final Permitted Waste Fill Surface Contours to Estimate Added Airspace Volume
18. INNOVATIVE LANDFILL OPERATIONS/OPTIMIZING AIRSPACE USE Application to Actual Landfill
Landfill Already at ˝ Capacity
Estimated Tonnage Capacity 9,140,500
With Settlement 10,100,000
10 % Increase
Extended Remaining Site Life From 10.5 yrs to 11.5 years
19. INNOVATIVE LANDFILL OPERATIONS/OPTIMIZING AIRSPACE USE Conclusions/Recommendations
Use of Heavier Compaction Equipment
Maximize Use of Thin Daily Cover/ADCs
Apply Overburden via Soil Stockpiles
Limit Removal of Moisture by LFG Extraction
Add Moisture (as allowed): Liquid or Steam
Track and Update Average “Landfilling Density” and Settlement