BEPIQUA PROJECT
180 likes | 297 Views
The BEPIQUA project conducted surveys via email and on-site visits to assess the implementation of Quality Assurance (QA) systems in universities. The email questionnaire received 26 responses, and 14 on-site visits were realized. The findings reveal that while many foundational requirements for QA exist, only 10% of universities have established QA systems. A majority express a strong desire to improve QA, supported by institutional recognition of quality culture. Key objectives and conclusions highlight the importance of collaboration and redefined roles in promoting effective QA practices.
BEPIQUA PROJECT
E N D
Presentation Transcript
BEPIQUA PROJECT SURVEY RESULTSEMAIL & ON-SITE VISITS
PROJECT SURVEYS BEPIQUA PROJECT: Two surveys: • Email questionnaire (26 replies out of possible 40) • On-site visits (5 foreseen in project, 14 realised)
ON-SITE SURVEY OBJECTIVES • To determine the extent of implementation of a QA system • To assess whether the need for establishing a QA system is appreciated • To evaluate whether there exists an institutional “Quality Culture”, which wouldfacilitate the implementation of a QA system • To ascertain the possibility of promoting the realisation of a QA system
EXTENT OF IMPLEMENTATION OF QA • A lot of the basic requirements exist, particularly statistics and IT • QA Concept known • 10% of UNICA universities have a QA system • National environment and Bologna process are “driving” implementation of QA systems • Generally TQM NOT available • International collaboration should be part of QA system (even where QA exists, IR not included)
LEVEL OF DESIRE FOR ESTABLISHING QA • This is high, a lot of Universities already have a “reporting of goals” system • Top management aware of QA and pertinent policy formulation forthcoming • Desire for evaluating performance and facilitating decision-making
PREVAILING “QUALITY CULTURE” (QC) • 90% of Universities reported that “QC” exists • Actions (Bologna process, national regulations etc) in place which strengthen QC • Why is there an existing QC?: because people believe in professionalism, have self confidence, wish to serve, want transparency, desire comparability
POSSIBILITY FOR ESTABLISHING QA SYSTEM • Supported by big majority of institutions • Realisation in the near future considered possible • Has support of staff involved • Acceptance of new working methods and approaches required • Recognition of the need for improving performance
GENERAL CONCLUSIONS • International collaboration no longer limited to mobility • In most Universities IR “centrally” controlled • IR funding exists as well as a “reporting” system • IRO and VR/IR play a central role in formulating IR policy • Need to redefine IRO “core activities” in order to meet new environment
GENERAL CONCLUSIONS • EC funding for IR mainly from EU programmes • IR performance is NOT measured • The preconditions required for “Quality Culture” appear to exist • Concept of “Benchmarks” and “Performance Indicators” are known but in the vast majority NOT used and particularly for IR