1 / 8

E3/E4 PEM Correlations, Part I

E3/E4 PEM Correlations, Part I. Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Detector Characterization Session N. Christensen, P. Fritschel, M. Ito, S. Klimenko, S. Marka, S. Mohanty, A. Ottewill, R. Rahkola, R. Schofield, J. Sylvestre. Magnetometer correlations. Top plot ~ 40 s

tdennis
Download Presentation

E3/E4 PEM Correlations, Part I

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. E3/E4 PEM Correlations, Part I Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Detector Characterization Session N. Christensen, P. Fritschel, M. Ito, S. Klimenko, S. Marka, S. Mohanty, A. Ottewill, R. Rahkola, R. Schofield, J. Sylvestre LSC Meeting Aug 15, 01

  2. Magnetometer correlations • Top plot ~ 40 s • Bottom plot ~120s • not ELF • Gateway vertical refresh rate 69.9Hz • Not observed in endstation LSC Meeting Aug 15, 01

  3. Summary • Coherence in power line monitors and fluxgate magnetometers drops on minute timescale • Some indication of correlation in power line monitors seen on 10h time scales • 16Hz correlations? • Gateway vertical refresh rate: 69.9Hz alerts us that good clocks can be coherent on long timescales • GPS synch is a perfect clock • More sensitive coil magnetometers available at both sites for entire E5 run – PEM data to be merged soon • Seismic correlations need to be investigated LSC Meeting Aug 15, 01

  4. the coherence of signals sL(t) and sH(t+t), where t is a time delay between two signals. coherence coefficient significance level phase difference uniformity Coherence & Significance Level blk – power monitors (60Hz) red – magnetometers (60Hz) S. Klimenko ~1000sec

  5. Magnetometer correlations N. Christensen Intersite coherence: H0:PEM-BSC1_MAG1Y L0:PEM-EX_MAG1X LSC Meeting Aug 15, 01

  6. Power monitor correlations P. Fritschel LSC Meeting Aug 15, 01

  7. Power monitor correlations LSC Meeting Aug 15, 01

  8. Power monitor coherence LSC Meeting Aug 15, 01

More Related