Esu 1 matthew burns ph d
Download
1 / 47

ESU #1 Matthew Burns, Ph.D. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation


  • 127 Views
  • Uploaded on

ESU #1 Matthew Burns, Ph.D. RTI = MTSS. The systematic use of assessment data to most efficiently allocate resources in order to enhance learning for all students. Burns & VanDerHeyden, 2006. MTSS and Problem-Solving. TIER III. Measurement Precision. TIER I I.

loader
I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of the copyrighted work described.
capcha
Download Presentation

PowerPoint Slideshow about 'ESU #1 Matthew Burns, Ph.D.' - tavon


An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation

Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author.While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E N D - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Presentation Transcript
Esu 1 matthew burns ph d

ESU #1Matthew Burns, Ph.D.


Rti mtss
RTI = MTSS

The systematic use of assessment data to most efficiently allocate resources in order to enhance learning for all students.

Burns & VanDerHeyden, 2006


Mtss and problem solving
MTSS and Problem-Solving

TIER III

Measurement Precision

TIER I I

Measurement Frequency

Problem-Analysis

TIER I


Problem solving
Problem Solving

  • Tier I – Identify discrepancy between expectation and performance for class or individual (Is it a classwide problem?)

  • Tier II – Identify discrepancy for individual. Identify category of problem. (What is the category of the problem?)

  • Tier III – Identify discrepancy for individual. Identify causal variable. (What is the causal variable?)


Sensitivity = a / (a + c) = .86 for ORF and .31 for F&P,

Specificity = d / (b + d) = .78 for ORF and .66 for F&P,

Overall Correct Classification = (a + d) / N = .80 for ORF and .54 for F&P


Four purposes of assessment
Four Purposes of Assessment

Program evaluation: How is the education system working for students overall?

  • State test

    Screening: Which of my students are not meeting grade level expectations given Universal Instruction?

  • E.g., MAP

    Diagnostic: What are the specific needs of students who struggle with math?

    E.g., measures of specific skills

    Monitoring Progress: What does the student’s growth look like?

    E.g., CBM


Path to reading excellence in school sites
Path to Reading Excellence in School Sites

w

www.cehd.umn.edu/reading/PRESS/default.html


Grade level team meeting
Grade Level Team Meeting

  • Is there a classwide problem?

  • Who needs Tier 2?

  • Did we miss anyone?

  • What should we do for Tier 2?

  • Should we go to Tier 3?



First question classwide or individual problem
First Question – Classwide or Individual Problem



Classwide intervention http kc vanderbilt edu pals

ClasswideInterventionhttp://kc.vanderbilt.edu/pals


Partner Reading

Partnerships

Minnesota Center for Reading Research


Procedure
Procedure

Minnesota Center for Reading Research


Timeline
Timeline

Collect Data: Pre-test (fluency and comprehension)

  • Day 1: Train Students on Set Up Procedures and Partner Reading, Practice Reading for 10 minutes, Error Correction

  • Day 2: Train Students on Paragraph Shrinking, Practice Reading for 10 minutes

  • Day 3-10: Partner Reading, Paragraph Shrinking 15 minutes every day

    Collect Data: Post-test(fluency and comprehension)

Minnesota Center for Reading Research


Partner reading
Partner Reading

RULES

  • First Reader reads for 5 minutes.

  • Second Reader reads the same text for 5 minutes.

  • Second Reader retells for 1 minute.

Talk only to your partner and only talk about Partner Reading

Keep your voice low

Help your partner

Try your best!

Minnesota Center for Reading Research


Paragraph shrinking
Paragraph Shrinking

  • Name the most important who or what.

  • Tell the most important thing about the who or what.

  • Say the main idea in 10 words or less.

Minnesota Center for Reading Research


STOP. That word is______________

What word?

______________________

Correction Procedures

Good Job!

Go back and read that line again.

Minnesota Center for Reading Research


What we found 3 rd grade partner reading data
What we found: 3rd grade Partner Reading data

Minnesota Center for Reading Research


What we found 3 rd grade partner reading data1
What we found: 3rd grade Partner Reading data

Minnesota Center for Reading Research


Growth from winter to spring class wide interventions 10 classrooms k 3
Growth from Winter to SpringClass-Wide Interventions10 Classrooms K-3


Growth from winter to spring no class wide interventions 11 classrooms k 3
Growth from Winter To SpringNO Class-Wide Interventions11 Classrooms K-3


Class-wide Interventions Implemented in 10 of the 21 Classes Below Winter Benchmark:9 of the 10 Above Spring Benchmark


NO Class-wide Intervention Implemented in 11 Classes Below Winter Benchmark2 of the 11 Above Spring Benchmark


Step 2 who needs tier ii also did we miss anyone
Step 2 – Who Needs Tier IIAlso – Did we miss anyone?


Reading interventions for tier ii
Reading Interventions for Tier II

  • PALS

  • HOSTS

  • Read Naturally

  • Rewards

  • Reading Rockets

  • Etc., etc., etc.

PROFICIENT READING


National reading panel
National Reading Panel

  • Is phonemic awareness instruction effective in helping children learn to read?

  • Reviewed 52 studies of PA instruction.

  • Three general outcomes were explored

    • PA tasks such as phoneme manipulation,

    • spelling,

    • and reading tasks such as word reading, pseudoword reading, reading comprehension, oral text reading, reading speed, time to reach a criterion of learning, and miscues


National reading panel results
National Reading Panel Results

  • PA instruction demonstrated better efficacy over alternative instruction models or no instruction

  • Improved PA measures (strong), reading (d = .53) and spelling skills

  • Teaching one or two PA skills was preferable to teaching three or more

  • PA instruction benefited reading comprehension (Ehri et al.).



Tier ii interventions
Tier II Interventions

  • PALS

  • HOSTS

  • Read Naturally

  • Rewards

  • Reading Rockets

  • Etc., etc., etc.

Phonemic Awareness

Phonics

Fluency

Vocabulary and Comprehension


Assess 4 nrp areas
Assess 4 NRP Areas

  • Phonemic Awareness

    • Phoneme segmentation fluency

  • Phonics

    • Nonsense word fluency (WJ Pseudoword)

  • Fluency

    • Oral reading fluency (TOSCRF)

  • Vocabulary/Comprehension


`


Comparison of targeted and comprehensive
Comparison of Targeted and Comprehensive

  • 306 second-grade and 303 third-grade students

  • Attended one of six elementary schools in an urban school district

  • 51.4% females, 14% white students, and 80% were eligible for the FRPL

  • Leveled Literacy Intervention

  • PRESS Interventions (comprehension, fluency, decoding, phonemic awareness)


ACCURACY

> 93%

Fluency intervention

Minnesota Center for Reading Research



ad