180 likes | 320 Views
Internal audits play a crucial role in improving institutional performance by identifying weaknesses, advising on best practices, and ensuring compliance with regulations. Key areas covered include objectives, strategies, budgeting processes, human resources, and information systems. In the context of research institutions, focus areas include research administration, documentation standards, and risk management. By adopting a future-focused approach, internal auditors can prepare institutions for upcoming challenges while utilizing tools like the PERT method for efficient project management. Outsourcing can also offer cost-effective solutions for audits.
E N D
Role of ia • Identify weaknesses • Identify problems • Provide advice
AREAS generally COVERED • Objectives • Strategy • Structure • Budgeting process • HR • Decision making • Development • Marketing • Information system • Equipment and operations
PARTICULAR AREAS IN RESEARCH INSTITUTION • research administration • degree of documentation of practices and processes • information security, notably over private and sensitive data • formalization of practice and policy in areas: • institutional conflict of interest, • code of conduct • enterprise risk mitigation and management
CHARACTERISTICS • Meaningful • Timely • Compliant with Auditing regulations • NO SUCH THING AS PERFECT ASSURANCE
Expand roles • Advisor • Prognosticator • Aggregator • Efficiency specialist • Advocate • Subject matter specialist • Troubleshooter
Cop, detective or counsel? • Cop – strengthen weak internal environment • Detective – identify problems, risks • Counsel – participative role, advise
New trends in IA • Past focused – financial reporting, assessments • Present focused – cash flows • FUTURE FOCUSED: is the company ready for new burdens/challenges? • OUTSOURCING AUDITING • Cheaper • More objective • Flexibility
COSts for externalization • 30 euro / hour • 180 hours / year • Around 5400 euro/year
Three point estimation / PERT METHOD • Pessimistic estimation (P) 90 • Most probable (MP) 75 • Optimistic (O) 40 (P + 4 x MP + O)/6 = Medium (90+4 x 75 + 40)/6 = 71.66 Used by : Motorola, Honeywell, General Electric
Three point estimation • Six Sigma System (6 Sigma) 68% chances of succes – value 1 95% chances of succes – value 2 99.7% chances of succes – value 3 99.9% chances of succes – value 6 Variation = Medium + (Standard deviation x Variation) Variation: (P-O)/6 = 8.33 For 95% chances – > 71.66 +(2x8.33) = 88.32
resources • http://www.federaltimes.com/article/20100808/ADOP06/8080304/ • http://www.corpgov.deloitte.com/binary/com.epicentric.contentmanagement.servlet.ContentDeliveryServlet/USEng/Documents/Audit%20Committee/Internal%20Audit/BrokenTriangle_042010.pdf • http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/Kor-Man/Management-Audit.html • http://web.mit.edu/audiv/www/controls/internal_control_structure.html • http://www.ttaudit.ro/audit_ro.html • http://www.hydrop.pub.ro/Cursul4si5mpm.pdf • http://improhealth.tnuni.sk/fileadmin/Documents/Improvement_tools_RO/PERT_diagram_RO_.pdf • http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ishikawa_Fishbone_Diagram.svg?uselang=de • http://www.lucidchart.com/community/examples/view/4b071ecd-6d30-4f50-9b5a-1caa0af95e9f